* [PATCH] ACPI: EC: add another DMI check for ASUS hardware
@ 2011-04-24 3:44 Peter Collingbourne
2011-04-24 21:09 ` [PATCH v2] " Peter Collingbourne
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Peter Collingbourne @ 2011-04-24 3:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-acpi; +Cc: Peter Collingbourne, Alexey Starikovskiy
Commit 0adf3c746a73684b3f8c2821a584e1db998f61e9 introduced a regression
by making the ECDT validation test for ASUS hardware more restrictive.
The previous test used the dmi_name_in_vendors function which searches
a number of DMI fields, while the new test checked only the BIOS
vendor, which is known to not match on an ASUS F5GL laptop which
requires ECDT validation.
Add a rule to ec_dmi_table based on an alternative DMI pattern for
ASUS hardware as found elsewhere in the kernel.
Cc: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Collingbourne <peter@pcc.me.uk>
---
According to a Google search [1], it seems unlikely that the ASUS
rule introduced by 0adf3c7 would ever match ASUS hardware. I wonder
if it is worth removing it.
[1] http://www.google.com/search?q=%22bios%20information%20vendor%20asus%22
drivers/acpi/ec.c | 3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/ec.c b/drivers/acpi/ec.c
index fa848c4..30ca717 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/ec.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/ec.c
@@ -940,6 +940,9 @@ static struct dmi_system_id __initdata ec_dmi_table[] = {
{
ec_validate_ecdt, "ASUS hardware", {
DMI_MATCH(DMI_BIOS_VENDOR, "ASUS") }, NULL},
+ {
+ ec_validate_ecdt, "ASUS hardware", {
+ DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_VENDOR, "ASUSTeK Computer Inc.") }, NULL},
{},
};
--
1.7.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] ACPI: EC: add another DMI check for ASUS hardware
2011-04-24 3:44 [PATCH] ACPI: EC: add another DMI check for ASUS hardware Peter Collingbourne
@ 2011-04-24 21:09 ` Peter Collingbourne
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Peter Collingbourne @ 2011-04-24 21:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-acpi; +Cc: Peter Collingbourne, Len Brown
Commit 0adf3c746a73684b3f8c2821a584e1db998f61e9 introduced a regression
by making the ECDT validation test for ASUS hardware more restrictive.
The previous test used the dmi_name_in_vendors function which searches
a number of DMI fields, while the new test checked only the BIOS
vendor, which is known to not match on an ASUS F5GL laptop which
requires ECDT validation.
Add a rule to ec_dmi_table based on an alternative DMI pattern for
ASUS hardware as found elsewhere in the kernel.
Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Collingbourne <peter@pcc.me.uk>
---
Peter Collingbourne wrote:
> Cc: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
Sorry for the noise, wrong person was cc'd as subsystem maintainer.
drivers/acpi/ec.c | 3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/ec.c b/drivers/acpi/ec.c
index fa848c4..30ca717 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/ec.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/ec.c
@@ -940,6 +940,9 @@ static struct dmi_system_id __initdata ec_dmi_table[] = {
{
ec_validate_ecdt, "ASUS hardware", {
DMI_MATCH(DMI_BIOS_VENDOR, "ASUS") }, NULL},
+ {
+ ec_validate_ecdt, "ASUS hardware", {
+ DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_VENDOR, "ASUSTeK Computer Inc.") }, NULL},
{},
};
--
1.7.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-04-24 21:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-04-24 3:44 [PATCH] ACPI: EC: add another DMI check for ASUS hardware Peter Collingbourne
2011-04-24 21:09 ` [PATCH v2] " Peter Collingbourne
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).