From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Huang Ying Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ACPI: Re-factor and remove ./drivers/acpi/atomicio.[ch] Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 08:56:04 +0800 Message-ID: <1320368164.24181.17.camel@yhuang-dev> References: <20110929215907.21126.24480.stgit@amt.stowe> <201111031731.17547.trenn@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:12053 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750931Ab1KDA4H (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Nov 2011 20:56:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: <201111031731.17547.trenn@suse.de> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Thomas Renninger Cc: Myron Stowe , "lenb@kernel.org" , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , "rjw@sisk.pl" , "bhelgaas@google.com" On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 00:31 +0800, Thomas Renninger wrote: > On Thursday, September 29, 2011 11:59:08 PM Myron Stowe wrote: > > Late last year I submitted a patch series that re-factored some existing > > work that Huang Ying introduced adding support for accessing ACPI > > generic registers backed by Memory Mapped I/O (MMIO) while within > > interrupt context: > > Huang Ying's commit 15651291a2f8c11e7e6a42d8bfde7a213ff13262, > > My series: http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=128769263327206&w=2. > > Ying: What is your opinion about this patchset? I am OK with the patchset. We just need some testing. > One major change seem to be to use a mutex instead of a spinlock > which looks like a fix as the pre-mapping should never happen in > irq context. Sorry, where is the mutex? > I expect the rest is more or less the same, but double checking > by someone who is more involved in these code paths would be > great. Best Regards, Huang Ying