From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yinghai Lu Subject: [PATCH part3 09/11] PCI: Clean up rescan_bus_bridge_resize() Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2012 14:52:19 -0700 Message-ID: <1346622741-30799-10-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> References: <1346622741-30799-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1346622741-30799-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Bjorn Helgaas , Taku Izumi , Jiang Liu , x86 Cc: Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Yinghai Lu List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Should only use it with bridge instead of bus. It could get new subordinate. so can not use it with reguar bus. In that case, user may need to make sure all children devices get removed already before rescan. Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu --- drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c | 7 ++----- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c index 2100c04..60cb06b 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c @@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ dev_bridge_rescan_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, if (val) { mutex_lock(&pci_remove_rescan_mutex); - pci_rescan_bus(pdev->subordinate); + pci_rescan_bus_bridge_resize(pdev); mutex_unlock(&pci_remove_rescan_mutex); } return count; @@ -389,10 +389,7 @@ dev_bus_rescan_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, if (val) { mutex_lock(&pci_remove_rescan_mutex); - if (!pci_is_root_bus(bus) && list_empty(&bus->devices)) - pci_rescan_bus_bridge_resize(bus->self); - else - pci_rescan_bus(bus); + pci_rescan_bus(bus); mutex_unlock(&pci_remove_rescan_mutex); } return count; -- 1.7.7