From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Toshi Kani Subject: Re: [Patch v5 0/7] acpi,memory-hotplug: implement framework for hot removing memory Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 17:40:59 -0700 Message-ID: <1353026459.12509.36.camel@misato.fc.hp.com> References: <1352962777-24407-1-git-send-email-wency@cn.fujitsu.com> <9217155.1eDFuhkN55@vostro.rjw.lan> <1816934.8XPDQmK5xC@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from g5t0006.atlanta.hp.com ([15.192.0.43]:9358 "EHLO g5t0006.atlanta.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751083Ab2KPAtM (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Nov 2012 19:49:12 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1816934.8XPDQmK5xC@vostro.rjw.lan> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Yasuaki Ishimatsu , Wen Congyang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown , Andrew Morton , Lai Jiangshan , Jiang Liu , KOSAKI Motohiro , Minchan Kim , Mel Gorman , David Rientjes , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > > Well, I have tried _really_ hard to apply this patchset, but pretty much > > none of the patches except for [1/7] applied for me. I have no idea what > > tree they are against, but I'm pretty sure it's not my tree. > > > > I _have_ applied patches [1-4/7] and pushed them to linux-pm.git/linux-next. > > I needed to fix up almost all of them so that they applied, so please check > > if my fixups make sense (and let me know ASAP if that's not the case). > > > > If they are OK, please rebase the rest of the series on top of > > linux-pm.git/linux-next and repost. I'm not going to take any more > > patches that don't apply from you. > > > > Moreover, I'm not going to take any more ACPI memory hotplug patches > > for v3.8 except for the [5-7/7] from this series (after they have been > > rebased and _if_ they apply), so please don't submit any until the v3.8 > > merge window closes (of course, you're free to post RFCs, but I will > > ignore them). > > And by the way, if someone gives a "Reviewed-by" to a patch that _obviously_ > doesn't apply, I will ignore any "Reviewed-by" from that person going forward, > because that quite obviously means you haven't even compared the patch with the > existing code and thus your "review" is worthless. I was able to apply all his patches on top of the Linus's tree... > If you just want to say you agree with the patch, use "Acked-by". Got it. Thanks, -Toshi > Thanks, > Rafael > >