From: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>, Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI / scan: Treat power resources in a special way
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 10:16:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1357579019.2153.2.camel@misato.fc.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1565436.cOJ1sW4X70@vostro.rjw.lan>
On Mon, 2012-12-31 at 00:46 +0000, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>
> Commit 1d57433 (ACPI: Separate adding ACPI device objects from
> probing ACPI drivers) introduced an ACPI power resources management
I am seeing a different commit id for this.
commit 805d410fb0dbd65e1a57a810858fa2491e75822d
Author: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Date: Fri Dec 21 00:36:39 2012 +0100
ACPI: Separate adding ACPI device objects from probing ACPI drivers
> regression, because it didn't ensure that the power resources
> driver bind to the struct acpi_device objects corresponding
> to power resources as soon as they were created. As a result,
> ACPI power management routines may attempt to access power resource
> objects before they are ready to use.
>
> To fix this problem, tell the acpi_add_single_object() in
> acpi_bus_check_add() to probe the driver for objects of type
> ACPI_BUS_TYPE_POWER. This fix has been verified to work on
> HP nx6325 where the problem was first observed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The change looks good.
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Thanks,
-Toshi
> ---
>
> The commit mentioned in the changelog is in linux-next only for now, but
> it's likely to go upstream in this form anyway and the fix on top of the
> whole ACPI scan series is trivial.
>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/scan.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: linux/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> +++ linux/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> @@ -1606,7 +1606,8 @@ static acpi_status acpi_bus_check_add(ac
> return AE_CTRL_DEPTH;
> }
>
> - acpi_add_single_object(&device, handle, type, sta, false);
> + acpi_add_single_object(&device, handle, type, sta,
> + type == ACPI_BUS_TYPE_POWER);
> if (!device)
> return AE_CTRL_DEPTH;
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-07 17:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-31 0:46 [PATCH] ACPI / scan: Treat power resources in a special way Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-07 17:16 ` Toshi Kani [this message]
2013-01-07 21:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1357579019.2153.2.camel@misato.fc.hp.com \
--to=toshi.kani@hp.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuj97@gmail.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox