public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
To: wency@cn.fujitsu.com
Cc: isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: enabled and failed flags in acpi_memory_info
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 14:06:57 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1358197617.14145.92.camel@misato.fc.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1357693472.14145.42.camel@misato.fc.hp.com>

Wen, Yasuaki, any thoughts on this?

Thanks,
-Toshi


On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 18:04 -0700, Toshi Kani wrote:
> Hi Wen,
> 
> I have a question about the change you made in commit 65479472 in
> acpi_memhotplug.c.  This change seems to require that
> acpi_memory_enable_device() calls add_memory() to add all memory ranges
> represented by memory device objects at boot-time, and keep the results
> be used for hot-remove.  
> 
> If I understand it right, this add_memory() call fails with EEXIST at
> boot-time since all memory ranges should have been added from EFI memory
> table (or e820) already.  This results all memory ranges be marked as !
> enabled & !failed.  I think this means that we cannot hot-delete any
> memory ranges presented at boot-time since acpi_memory_remove_memory()
> only calls remove_memory() when the enabled flag is set.  Is that
> correct?  If so, why do we need such restriction?
> 
> In addition, as part of RFC patchset of proposed hotplug framework below
> (well, this is why I am wondering this... :), I simply called
> add_memory() and remove_memory() for the ranges requested for hot-add /
> hot-delete.  It does not call add_memory() at boot-time and set the
> enabled & failed flags.  But it does not eject memory when
> remove_memory() failed, either.  Do you see any problems with this
> approach? 
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/12/457
> 
> Thanks,
> -Toshi



  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-14 21:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-09  1:04 enabled and failed flags in acpi_memory_info Toshi Kani
2013-01-14 21:06 ` Toshi Kani [this message]
2013-01-16 14:33   ` Wen Congyang
2013-01-16 17:09     ` Toshi Kani

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1358197617.14145.92.camel@misato.fc.hp.com \
    --to=toshi.kani@hp.com \
    --cc=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wency@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox