From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] x86: add support for Intel Low Power Subsystem
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 15:45:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1358516761-20981-2-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1358516761-20981-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
We are starting to see traditional SoC peripherals also in the x86 world in
chips like Intel Lynxpoint. Typically we already have a Linux driver for
the peripheral but it takes advantage of the common clk framework to
control and retrieve information about the peripheral clock.
So far there hasn't been a standard way on x86 to pass information such as
clock rate from whatever the configuration system is used to the driver,
but instead different variations have emerged, like adding this information
to the platform data.
Solve this by adding a new config option X86_INTEL_LPSS. If this is
selected we enable common clk framework (and everything else) that is
needed to support the Intel LPSS drivers.
Enabling common clk framework on x86 was originally proposed by Mark Brown.
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/Kconfig | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index 79795af..c8c9b14 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -454,6 +454,16 @@ config X86_MDFLD
endif
+config X86_INTEL_LPSS
+ bool "Intel Low Power Subsystem Support"
+ depends on ACPI
+ select COMMON_CLK
+ ---help---
+ Select to build support for Intel Low Power Subsystem such as
+ found on Intel Lynxpoint PCH. Selecting this option enables
+ things like clock tree (common clock framework) which are needed
+ by the LPSS peripheral drivers.
+
config X86_RDC321X
bool "RDC R-321x SoC"
depends on X86_32
--
1.7.10.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-18 13:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-18 13:45 [PATCH v2 0/3] x86: enable common clk and add support for Lynxpoint clocks Mika Westerberg
2013-01-18 13:45 ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
2013-01-18 13:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] clk: x86: add support for Lynxpoint LPSS clocks Mika Westerberg
2013-01-22 18:47 ` Mike Turquette
2013-01-23 17:40 ` Mika Westerberg
2013-01-18 13:46 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] ACPI / platform: create LPSS clocks if Lynxpoint devices are found during scan Mika Westerberg
2013-01-19 0:17 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] x86: enable common clk and add support for Lynxpoint clocks Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1358516761-20981-2-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mturquette@linaro.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).