From: Danny Baumann <dannybaumann@web.de>
To: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Danny Baumann <dannybaumann@web.de>
Subject: [PATCH v4 3/3] ACPI video: Fix applying indexed initial brightness value.
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 17:22:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1363710172-2906-3-git-send-email-dannybaumann@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1363710172-2906-1-git-send-email-dannybaumann@web.de>
The value initially read via _BQC also needs to be offset by 2 to
compensate for the first 2 special items in _BCL. Introduce a helper
function that does the BQC-value-to-level conversion in order to not
needlessly duplicate code.
Signed-off-by: Danny Baumann <dannybaumann@web.de>
---
drivers/acpi/video.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/video.c b/drivers/acpi/video.c
index 89bf61e..86beaa8 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/video.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/video.c
@@ -450,6 +450,31 @@ static struct dmi_system_id video_dmi_table[] __initdata = {
{}
};
+static unsigned long long
+acpi_video_bqc_value_to_level(struct acpi_video_device *device,
+ unsigned long long bqc_value)
+{
+ unsigned long long level;
+
+ if (device->brightness->flags._BQC_use_index) {
+ /*
+ * _BQC returns an index that doesn't account for
+ * the first 2 items with special meaning, so we need
+ * to compensate for that by offsetting ourselves
+ */
+ if (device->brightness->flags._BCL_reversed)
+ bqc_value = device->brightness->count - 3 - bqc_value;
+
+ level = device->brightness->levels[bqc_value + 2];
+ } else {
+ level = bqc_value;
+ }
+
+ level += bqc_offset_aml_bug_workaround;
+
+ return level;
+}
+
static int
acpi_video_device_lcd_get_level_current(struct acpi_video_device *device,
unsigned long long *level, bool raw)
@@ -472,14 +497,8 @@ acpi_video_device_lcd_get_level_current(struct acpi_video_device *device,
return 0;
}
- if (device->brightness->flags._BQC_use_index) {
- if (device->brightness->flags._BCL_reversed)
- *level = device->brightness->count
- - 3 - (*level);
- *level = device->brightness->levels[*level + 2];
+ *level = acpi_video_bqc_value_to_level(device, *level);
- }
- *level += bqc_offset_aml_bug_workaround;
for (i = 2; i < device->brightness->count; i++)
if (device->brightness->levels[i] == *level) {
device->brightness->curr = *level;
@@ -728,24 +747,19 @@ acpi_video_init_brightness(struct acpi_video_device *device)
br->flags._BQC_use_index = (level == max_level ? 0 : 1);
- if (!br->flags._BQC_use_index) {
+ if (use_bios_initial_backlight) {
+ level = acpi_video_bqc_value_to_level(device, level_old);
/*
- * Set the backlight to the initial state.
- * On some buggy laptops, _BQC returns an uninitialized value
- * when invoked for the first time, i.e. level_old is invalid.
- * set the backlight to max_level in this case
+ * On some buggy laptops, _BQC returns an uninitialized
+ * value when invoked for the first time, i.e.
+ * level_old is invalid (no matter whether it's a level
+ * or an index). Set the backlight to max_level in this case.
*/
- if (use_bios_initial_backlight) {
- for (i = 2; i < br->count; i++)
- if (level_old == br->levels[i]) {
- level = level_old;
- break;
- }
- }
- } else {
- if (br->flags._BCL_reversed)
- level_old = (br->count - 1) - level_old;
- level = br->levels[level_old];
+ for (i = 2; i < br->count; i++)
+ if (level_old == br->levels[i])
+ break;
+ if (i == br->count)
+ level = max_level;
}
set_level:
--
1.8.1.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-19 16:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-19 16:22 [PATCH v4 1/3] ACPI video: Fix brightness control initialization for some laptops Danny Baumann
2013-03-19 16:22 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] ACPI video: Make logic a little easier to understand Danny Baumann
2013-03-19 16:22 ` Danny Baumann [this message]
2013-03-19 16:24 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] ACPI video: Fix brightness control initialization for some laptops Danny Baumann
2013-03-20 7:32 ` Aaron Lu
2013-03-26 13:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1363710172-2906-3-git-send-email-dannybaumann@web.de \
--to=dannybaumann@web.de \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox