public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: joeyli <jlee@suse.com>
To: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
Cc: mjg@redhat.com, rjw@sisk.pl, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Carlos Corbacho <carlos@strangeworlds.co.uk>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>,
	Corentin Chary <corentincj@iksaif.net>,
	Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] acpi: video: add function to support unregister backlight
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 18:06:06 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1367229966.22858.52.camel@linux-s257.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <517A0FA1.3040406@intel.com>

於 五,2013-04-26 於 13:24 +0800,Aaron Lu 提到:
> On 04/22/2013 08:39 PM, Chun-Yi Lee wrote:
> > From: "Lee, Chun-Yi" <jlee@suse.com>
> >
> > There have situation we unregister whole acpi/video driver by downstream driver
> > just want to remove backlight control interface of acpi/video. It caues we lost
> > other functions of acpi/video, e.g. transfer acpi event to input event.
> >
> > So, this patch add a new function, find_video_unregister_backlight, it provide
> > the interface let downstream driver can tell acpi/video to unregister backlight
> > interface of all acpi video devices. Then we can keep functions of acpi/video
> > but only remove backlight support.
> >
> > Reference: bko#35622
> >          https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35622
> >
> > Tested-by: Andrzej Krentosz <endrjux@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Carlos Corbacho <carlos@strangeworlds.co.uk>
> > Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
> > Cc: Corentin Chary <corentincj@iksaif.net>
> > Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> > Cc: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
> > Cc: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
> > Signed-off-by: Lee, Chun-Yi <jlee@suse.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/acpi/video.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >   include/acpi/video.h |  2 ++
> >   2 files changed, 48 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/video.c b/drivers/acpi/video.c
> > index 313f959..acd2e7a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/video.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/video.c
> > @@ -1793,6 +1793,52 @@ static int __init intel_opregion_present(void)
> >   	return opregion;
> >   }
> >
> > +static acpi_status
> > +find_video_unregister_backlight(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl, void *context,
> > +				void **rv)
> > +{
> > +	struct acpi_device *acpi_dev;
> > +	struct acpi_video_bus *video = NULL;
> > +	struct acpi_video_device *dev, *next;
> > +
> > +	if (acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &acpi_dev))
> > +		return AE_OK;
> > +
> > +	if (!acpi_match_device_ids(acpi_dev, video_device_ids)) {
> > +		video = acpi_driver_data(acpi_dev);
> > +		acpi_video_bus_stop_devices(video);
> > +		mutex_lock(&video->device_list_lock);
> > +		list_for_each_entry_safe(dev, next, &video->video_device_list,
> > +					entry) {
> > +			if (dev->backlight) {
> > +				backlight_device_unregister(dev->backlight);
> > +				dev->backlight = NULL;
> > +				kfree(dev->brightness->levels);
> > +				kfree(dev->brightness);
> > +			}
> 
> The cooling_dev should also be unregistered I think.
> 
> Thanks,
> Aaron
> 

Yes, you are right!

Unregistering  backlight interface of video devices means the backlight
control functions broken, so it can not used for throttling.

I will unregister cooling_dev in v2 patch.


Thanks a lot!
Joey Lee

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-29 10:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-22 12:39 [PATCH 2/2] acer-wmi: add Acer Aspire 5750G to video vendor list but keep acpi video driver Chun-Yi Lee
2013-04-22 12:39 ` [PATCH 1/2] acpi: video: add function to support unregister backlight Chun-Yi Lee
2013-04-22 23:09   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-04-23  4:12   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2013-04-29  9:19     ` joeyli
2013-04-26  5:24   ` Aaron Lu
2013-04-29 10:06     ` joeyli [this message]
2013-04-23  4:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] acer-wmi: add Acer Aspire 5750G to video vendor list but keep acpi video driver Dmitry Torokhov
2013-04-29  9:21   ` joeyli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1367229966.22858.52.camel@linux-s257.site \
    --to=jlee@suse.com \
    --cc=aaron.lu@intel.com \
    --cc=carlos@strangeworlds.co.uk \
    --cc=corentincj@iksaif.net \
    --cc=dtor@mail.ru \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjg@redhat.com \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=trenn@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox