linux-acpi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v3 00/10] minor improvements for ACPI dock and acpiphp drivers
@ 2013-06-28 16:24 Jiang Liu
  2013-06-28 16:24 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] ACPI, DOCK: avoid initializing acpi_dock_notifier_list multiple times Jiang Liu
                   ` (10 more replies)
  0 siblings, 11 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jiang Liu @ 2013-06-28 16:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J . Wysocki
  Cc: liuj97, Jiang Liu, Yijing Wang, linux-acpi, linux-kernel

From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>

This is an following up patchset of "[PATCH 0/3] ACPI / dock / PCI: Fix
problems with dock and PCI hotplug" with minor code cleanups and
refinements. It applies to
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git linux-next

Due to hardware resource limitation, I have only done compilation and
boot tests.

V2->V3:
    The first four patches are the same as previous version and rework
    all other patches according to review comments.

Jiang Liu (10):
  ACPI, DOCK: avoid initializing acpi_dock_notifier_list multiple times
  ACPI, DOCK: kill redundant spin lock in dock station object
  ACPI, DOCK: mark initialization functions with __init
  ACPI, DOCK: simplify implementation of dock_create_acpi_device()
  ACPI: introduce helper function acpi_has_method()
  ACPI: introduce helper function acpi_execute_simple_method()
  ACPI: introduce two helper functions to simplify code
  ACPI: change acpi_[bay|dock]_match() in scan.c as global functions
  ACPI: simplify dock driver with new helper functions
  ACPI: simplify acpiphp driver with new helper functions

 drivers/acpi/battery.c             |  19 +---
 drivers/acpi/bus.c                 |   6 +-
 drivers/acpi/dock.c                | 152 ++++-------------------------
 drivers/acpi/ec.c                  |   4 +-
 drivers/acpi/power.c               |   4 +-
 drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c   |  22 ++---
 drivers/acpi/resource.c            |   4 +-
 drivers/acpi/scan.c                | 189 +++++++++++++------------------------
 drivers/acpi/sleep.c               |   7 +-
 drivers/acpi/thermal.c             |  18 +---
 drivers/acpi/utils.c               |  70 ++++++++++++++
 drivers/acpi/video.c               |  56 ++++-------
 drivers/acpi/video_detect.c        |  19 ++--
 drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c |  30 ++----
 include/acpi/acpi_bus.h            |  10 ++
 15 files changed, 218 insertions(+), 392 deletions(-)

-- 
1.8.1.2


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v3 01/10] ACPI, DOCK: avoid initializing acpi_dock_notifier_list multiple times
  2013-06-28 16:24 [PATCH v3 00/10] minor improvements for ACPI dock and acpiphp drivers Jiang Liu
@ 2013-06-28 16:24 ` Jiang Liu
  2013-06-28 16:24 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] ACPI, DOCK: kill redundant spin lock in dock station object Jiang Liu
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jiang Liu @ 2013-06-28 16:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J . Wysocki
  Cc: liuj97, Jiang Liu, Yijing Wang, linux-acpi, linux-kernel,
	Len Brown

From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>

Function dock_add() will be called multiple times if there are multiple
dock stations, which causes acpi_dock_notifier_list being initialized
multiple times. So move initialization of acpi_dock_notifier_list from
dock_add() to acpi_dock_init().

Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
 drivers/acpi/dock.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/dock.c b/drivers/acpi/dock.c
index 14de9f4..e944e39 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/dock.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/dock.c
@@ -1007,7 +1007,6 @@ static int __init dock_add(acpi_handle handle)
 	mutex_init(&dock_station->hp_lock);
 	spin_lock_init(&dock_station->dd_lock);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dock_station->sibling);
-	ATOMIC_INIT_NOTIFIER_HEAD(&dock_notifier_list);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dock_station->dependent_devices);
 
 	/* we want the dock device to send uevents */
@@ -1078,6 +1077,7 @@ int __init acpi_dock_init(void)
 		return 0;
 	}
 
+	ATOMIC_INIT_NOTIFIER_HEAD(&dock_notifier_list);
 	register_acpi_bus_notifier(&dock_acpi_notifier);
 	pr_info(PREFIX "%s: %d docks/bays found\n",
 		ACPI_DOCK_DRIVER_DESCRIPTION, dock_station_count);
-- 
1.8.1.2

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v3 02/10] ACPI, DOCK: kill redundant spin lock in dock station object
  2013-06-28 16:24 [PATCH v3 00/10] minor improvements for ACPI dock and acpiphp drivers Jiang Liu
  2013-06-28 16:24 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] ACPI, DOCK: avoid initializing acpi_dock_notifier_list multiple times Jiang Liu
@ 2013-06-28 16:24 ` Jiang Liu
  2013-06-28 16:24 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] ACPI, DOCK: mark initialization functions with __init Jiang Liu
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jiang Liu @ 2013-06-28 16:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J . Wysocki
  Cc: liuj97, Jiang Liu, Yijing Wang, linux-acpi, linux-kernel,
	Len Brown

From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>

All dock station objects are created during initialization and don't
change at runtime, so kill the redundant spin lock in dock station
object.

Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
 drivers/acpi/dock.c | 15 +++------------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/dock.c b/drivers/acpi/dock.c
index e944e39..a73571f 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/dock.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/dock.c
@@ -63,7 +63,6 @@ struct dock_station {
 	acpi_handle handle;
 	unsigned long last_dock_time;
 	u32 flags;
-	spinlock_t dd_lock;
 	struct mutex hp_lock;
 	struct list_head dependent_devices;
 
@@ -112,10 +111,7 @@ add_dock_dependent_device(struct dock_station *ds, acpi_handle handle)
 
 	dd->handle = handle;
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dd->list);
-
-	spin_lock(&ds->dd_lock);
 	list_add_tail(&dd->list, &ds->dependent_devices);
-	spin_unlock(&ds->dd_lock);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -220,14 +216,10 @@ find_dock_dependent_device(struct dock_station *ds, acpi_handle handle)
 {
 	struct dock_dependent_device *dd;
 
-	spin_lock(&ds->dd_lock);
-	list_for_each_entry(dd, &ds->dependent_devices, list) {
-		if (handle == dd->handle) {
-			spin_unlock(&ds->dd_lock);
+	list_for_each_entry(dd, &ds->dependent_devices, list)
+		if (handle == dd->handle)
 			return dd;
-		}
-	}
-	spin_unlock(&ds->dd_lock);
+
 	return NULL;
 }
 
@@ -1005,7 +997,6 @@ static int __init dock_add(acpi_handle handle)
 	dock_station->last_dock_time = jiffies - HZ;
 
 	mutex_init(&dock_station->hp_lock);
-	spin_lock_init(&dock_station->dd_lock);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dock_station->sibling);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dock_station->dependent_devices);
 
-- 
1.8.1.2

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v3 03/10] ACPI, DOCK: mark initialization functions with __init
  2013-06-28 16:24 [PATCH v3 00/10] minor improvements for ACPI dock and acpiphp drivers Jiang Liu
  2013-06-28 16:24 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] ACPI, DOCK: avoid initializing acpi_dock_notifier_list multiple times Jiang Liu
  2013-06-28 16:24 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] ACPI, DOCK: kill redundant spin lock in dock station object Jiang Liu
@ 2013-06-28 16:24 ` Jiang Liu
  2013-06-28 16:24 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] ACPI, DOCK: simplify implementation of dock_create_acpi_device() Jiang Liu
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jiang Liu @ 2013-06-28 16:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J . Wysocki
  Cc: liuj97, Jiang Liu, Yijing Wang, linux-acpi, linux-kernel,
	Len Brown

From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>

Mark all initialization functions with __init to reduce runtime memory
consumption.

Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
 drivers/acpi/dock.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/dock.c b/drivers/acpi/dock.c
index a73571f..8c4214d 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/dock.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/dock.c
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ struct dock_dependent_device {
  *
  * Add the dependent device to the dock's dependent device list.
  */
-static int
+static int __init
 add_dock_dependent_device(struct dock_station *ds, acpi_handle handle)
 {
 	struct dock_dependent_device *dd;
@@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ static int is_dock(acpi_handle handle)
 	return 1;
 }
 
-static int is_ejectable(acpi_handle handle)
+static int __init is_ejectable(acpi_handle handle)
 {
 	acpi_status status;
 	acpi_handle tmp;
@@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ static int is_ejectable(acpi_handle handle)
 	return 1;
 }
 
-static int is_ata(acpi_handle handle)
+static int __init is_ata(acpi_handle handle)
 {
 	acpi_handle tmp;
 
@@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ static int is_ata(acpi_handle handle)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int is_battery(acpi_handle handle)
+static int __init is_battery(acpi_handle handle)
 {
 	struct acpi_device_info *info;
 	int ret = 1;
@@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ static int is_battery(acpi_handle handle)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static int is_ejectable_bay(acpi_handle handle)
+static int __init is_ejectable_bay(acpi_handle handle)
 {
 	acpi_handle phandle;
 
@@ -848,7 +848,7 @@ static struct notifier_block dock_acpi_notifier = {
  * check to see if an object has an _EJD method.  If it does, then it
  * will see if it is dependent on the dock station.
  */
-static acpi_status
+static acpi_status __init
 find_dock_devices(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl, void *context, void **rv)
 {
 	acpi_status status;
-- 
1.8.1.2

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v3 04/10] ACPI, DOCK: simplify implementation of dock_create_acpi_device()
  2013-06-28 16:24 [PATCH v3 00/10] minor improvements for ACPI dock and acpiphp drivers Jiang Liu
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2013-06-28 16:24 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] ACPI, DOCK: mark initialization functions with __init Jiang Liu
@ 2013-06-28 16:24 ` Jiang Liu
  2013-06-28 16:24 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] ACPI: introduce helper function acpi_has_method() Jiang Liu
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jiang Liu @ 2013-06-28 16:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J . Wysocki
  Cc: liuj97, Jiang Liu, Yijing Wang, linux-acpi, linux-kernel,
	Len Brown

From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>

The return value of dock_create_acpi_device() is not used at all,
so change the signature to return void and simplify implementation.

Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
 drivers/acpi/dock.c | 7 +------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/dock.c b/drivers/acpi/dock.c
index 8c4214d..22183c4 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/dock.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/dock.c
@@ -351,10 +351,8 @@ static int dock_present(struct dock_station *ds)
  *  handle if one does not exist already.  This should cause
  *  acpi to scan for drivers for the given devices, and call
  *  matching driver's add routine.
- *
- *  Returns a pointer to the acpi_device corresponding to the handle.
  */
-static struct acpi_device * dock_create_acpi_device(acpi_handle handle)
+static void dock_create_acpi_device(acpi_handle handle)
 {
 	struct acpi_device *device;
 	int ret;
@@ -367,10 +365,7 @@ static struct acpi_device * dock_create_acpi_device(acpi_handle handle)
 		ret = acpi_bus_scan(handle);
 		if (ret)
 			pr_debug("error adding bus, %x\n", -ret);
-
-		acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &device);
 	}
-	return device;
 }
 
 /**
-- 
1.8.1.2

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v3 05/10] ACPI: introduce helper function acpi_has_method()
  2013-06-28 16:24 [PATCH v3 00/10] minor improvements for ACPI dock and acpiphp drivers Jiang Liu
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2013-06-28 16:24 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] ACPI, DOCK: simplify implementation of dock_create_acpi_device() Jiang Liu
@ 2013-06-28 16:24 ` Jiang Liu
  2013-06-28 16:24 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] ACPI: introduce helper function acpi_execute_simple_method() Jiang Liu
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jiang Liu @ 2013-06-28 16:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J . Wysocki
  Cc: liuj97, Jiang Liu, Yijing Wang, linux-acpi, linux-kernel,
	Len Brown, Zhang Rui

From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>

Introduce helper function acpi_has_method() to simplify code.

Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Cc: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
 drivers/acpi/battery.c           | 11 ++---
 drivers/acpi/ec.c                |  4 +-
 drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c | 22 +++------
 drivers/acpi/resource.c          |  4 +-
 drivers/acpi/scan.c              | 99 ++++++++++++----------------------------
 drivers/acpi/utils.c             | 15 ++++++
 drivers/acpi/video.c             | 39 +++++-----------
 drivers/acpi/video_detect.c      | 19 ++++----
 include/acpi/acpi_bus.h          |  3 ++
 9 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 136 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/battery.c b/drivers/acpi/battery.c
index 082b4dd..a762716 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/battery.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/battery.c
@@ -548,12 +548,8 @@ static int acpi_battery_set_alarm(struct acpi_battery *battery)
 
 static int acpi_battery_init_alarm(struct acpi_battery *battery)
 {
-	acpi_status status = AE_OK;
-	acpi_handle handle = NULL;
-
 	/* See if alarms are supported, and if so, set default */
-	status = acpi_get_handle(battery->device->handle, "_BTP", &handle);
-	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
+	if (!acpi_has_method(battery->device->handle, "_BTP")) {
 		clear_bit(ACPI_BATTERY_ALARM_PRESENT, &battery->flags);
 		return 0;
 	}
@@ -1066,7 +1062,7 @@ static int acpi_battery_add(struct acpi_device *device)
 {
 	int result = 0;
 	struct acpi_battery *battery = NULL;
-	acpi_handle handle;
+
 	if (!device)
 		return -EINVAL;
 	battery = kzalloc(sizeof(struct acpi_battery), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -1078,8 +1074,7 @@ static int acpi_battery_add(struct acpi_device *device)
 	device->driver_data = battery;
 	mutex_init(&battery->lock);
 	mutex_init(&battery->sysfs_lock);
-	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(battery->device->handle,
-			"_BIX", &handle)))
+	if (acpi_has_method(battery->device->handle, "_BIX"))
 		set_bit(ACPI_BATTERY_XINFO_PRESENT, &battery->flags);
 	result = acpi_battery_update(battery);
 	if (result)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/ec.c b/drivers/acpi/ec.c
index 80403c1..84bf06c 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/ec.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/ec.c
@@ -1049,10 +1049,8 @@ int __init acpi_ec_ecdt_probe(void)
 		* which needs it, has fake EC._INI method, so use it as flag.
 		* Keep boot_ec struct as it will be needed soon.
 		*/
-		acpi_handle dummy;
 		if (!dmi_name_in_vendors("ASUS") ||
-		    ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_get_handle(boot_ec->handle, "_INI",
-							&dummy)))
+		    !acpi_has_method(boot_ec->handle, "_INI"))
 			return -ENODEV;
 	}
 install:
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
index 1e9732d..51d7948 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
@@ -164,17 +164,12 @@ static void acpi_processor_ppc_ost(acpi_handle handle, int status)
 		{.type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER,},
 	};
 	struct acpi_object_list arg_list = {2, params};
-	acpi_handle temp;
 
-	params[0].integer.value = ACPI_PROCESSOR_NOTIFY_PERFORMANCE;
-	params[1].integer.value =  status;
-
-	/* when there is no _OST , skip it */
-	if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_get_handle(handle, "_OST", &temp)))
-		return;
-
-	acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_OST", &arg_list, NULL);
-	return;
+	if (acpi_has_method(handle, "_OST")) {
+		params[0].integer.value = ACPI_PROCESSOR_NOTIFY_PERFORMANCE;
+		params[1].integer.value =  status;
+		acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_OST", &arg_list, NULL);
+	}
 }
 
 int acpi_processor_ppc_has_changed(struct acpi_processor *pr, int event_flag)
@@ -468,14 +463,11 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_performance_states(struct acpi_processor *pr)
 int acpi_processor_get_performance_info(struct acpi_processor *pr)
 {
 	int result = 0;
-	acpi_status status = AE_OK;
-	acpi_handle handle = NULL;
 
 	if (!pr || !pr->performance || !pr->handle)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	status = acpi_get_handle(pr->handle, "_PCT", &handle);
-	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
+	if (!acpi_has_method(pr->handle, "_PCT")) {
 		ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO,
 				  "ACPI-based processor performance control unavailable\n"));
 		return -ENODEV;
@@ -501,7 +493,7 @@ int acpi_processor_get_performance_info(struct acpi_processor *pr)
 	 */
  update_bios:
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86
-	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(pr->handle, "_PPC", &handle))){
+	if (acpi_has_method(pr->handle, "_PPC")) {
 		if(boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_EST))
 			printk(KERN_WARNING FW_BUG "BIOS needs update for CPU "
 			       "frequency support\n");
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/resource.c b/drivers/acpi/resource.c
index 3322b47..b7201fc 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/resource.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/resource.c
@@ -505,14 +505,12 @@ int acpi_dev_get_resources(struct acpi_device *adev, struct list_head *list,
 			   void *preproc_data)
 {
 	struct res_proc_context c;
-	acpi_handle not_used;
 	acpi_status status;
 
 	if (!adev || !adev->handle || !list_empty(list))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	status = acpi_get_handle(adev->handle, METHOD_NAME__CRS, &not_used);
-	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
+	if (!acpi_has_method(adev->handle, METHOD_NAME__CRS))
 		return 0;
 
 	c.list = list;
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
index dfe76f1..84d88a0 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
@@ -194,7 +194,6 @@ static acpi_status acpi_bus_online_companions(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl,
 static int acpi_scan_hot_remove(struct acpi_device *device)
 {
 	acpi_handle handle = device->handle;
-	acpi_handle not_used;
 	struct acpi_object_list arg_list;
 	union acpi_object arg;
 	struct device *errdev;
@@ -259,7 +258,7 @@ static int acpi_scan_hot_remove(struct acpi_device *device)
 	put_device(&device->dev);
 	device = NULL;
 
-	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(handle, "_LCK", &not_used))) {
+	if (acpi_has_method(handle, "_LCK")) {
 		arg_list.count = 1;
 		arg_list.pointer = &arg;
 		arg.type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
@@ -653,7 +652,6 @@ static int acpi_device_setup_files(struct acpi_device *dev)
 {
 	struct acpi_buffer buffer = {ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL};
 	acpi_status status;
-	acpi_handle temp;
 	unsigned long long sun;
 	int result = 0;
 
@@ -679,8 +677,7 @@ static int acpi_device_setup_files(struct acpi_device *dev)
 	/*
 	 * If device has _STR, 'description' file is created
 	 */
-	status = acpi_get_handle(dev->handle, "_STR", &temp);
-	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
+	if (acpi_has_method(dev->handle, "_STR")) {
 		status = acpi_evaluate_object(dev->handle, "_STR",
 					NULL, &buffer);
 		if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
@@ -710,8 +707,7 @@ static int acpi_device_setup_files(struct acpi_device *dev)
          * If device has _EJ0, 'eject' file is created that is used to trigger
          * hot-removal function from userland.
          */
-	status = acpi_get_handle(dev->handle, "_EJ0", &temp);
-	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
+	if (acpi_has_method(dev->handle, "_EJ0")) {
 		result = device_create_file(&dev->dev, &dev_attr_eject);
 		if (result)
 			return result;
@@ -733,9 +729,6 @@ end:
 
 static void acpi_device_remove_files(struct acpi_device *dev)
 {
-	acpi_status status;
-	acpi_handle temp;
-
 	if (dev->flags.power_manageable) {
 		device_remove_file(&dev->dev, &dev_attr_power_state);
 		if (dev->power.flags.power_resources)
@@ -746,20 +739,17 @@ static void acpi_device_remove_files(struct acpi_device *dev)
 	/*
 	 * If device has _STR, remove 'description' file
 	 */
-	status = acpi_get_handle(dev->handle, "_STR", &temp);
-	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
+	if (acpi_has_method(dev->handle, "_STR")) {
 		kfree(dev->pnp.str_obj);
 		device_remove_file(&dev->dev, &dev_attr_description);
 	}
 	/*
 	 * If device has _EJ0, remove 'eject' file.
 	 */
-	status = acpi_get_handle(dev->handle, "_EJ0", &temp);
-	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
+	if (acpi_has_method(dev->handle, "_EJ0"))
 		device_remove_file(&dev->dev, &dev_attr_eject);
 
-	status = acpi_get_handle(dev->handle, "_SUN", &temp);
-	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
+	if (acpi_has_method(dev->handle, "_SUN"))
 		device_remove_file(&dev->dev, &dev_attr_sun);
 
 	if (dev->pnp.unique_id)
@@ -1335,13 +1325,10 @@ static void acpi_bus_set_run_wake_flags(struct acpi_device *device)
 
 static void acpi_bus_get_wakeup_device_flags(struct acpi_device *device)
 {
-	acpi_handle temp;
-	acpi_status status = 0;
 	int err;
 
 	/* Presence of _PRW indicates wake capable */
-	status = acpi_get_handle(device->handle, "_PRW", &temp);
-	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
+	if (!acpi_has_method(device->handle, "_PRW"))
 		return;
 
 	err = acpi_bus_extract_wakeup_device_power_package(device->handle,
@@ -1371,7 +1358,6 @@ static void acpi_bus_init_power_state(struct acpi_device *device, int state)
 	struct acpi_device_power_state *ps = &device->power.states[state];
 	char pathname[5] = { '_', 'P', 'R', '0' + state, '\0' };
 	struct acpi_buffer buffer = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };
-	acpi_handle handle;
 	acpi_status status;
 
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ps->resources);
@@ -1394,8 +1380,7 @@ static void acpi_bus_init_power_state(struct acpi_device *device, int state)
 
 	/* Evaluate "_PSx" to see if we can do explicit sets */
 	pathname[2] = 'S';
-	status = acpi_get_handle(device->handle, pathname, &handle);
-	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
+	if (acpi_has_method(device->handle, pathname))
 		ps->flags.explicit_set = 1;
 
 	/*
@@ -1414,28 +1399,21 @@ static void acpi_bus_init_power_state(struct acpi_device *device, int state)
 
 static void acpi_bus_get_power_flags(struct acpi_device *device)
 {
-	acpi_status status;
-	acpi_handle handle;
 	u32 i;
 
 	/* Presence of _PS0|_PR0 indicates 'power manageable' */
-	status = acpi_get_handle(device->handle, "_PS0", &handle);
-	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
-		status = acpi_get_handle(device->handle, "_PR0", &handle);
-		if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
-			return;
-	}
+	if (!acpi_has_method(device->handle, "_PS0") &&
+	    !acpi_has_method(device->handle, "_PR0"))
+		return;
 
 	device->flags.power_manageable = 1;
 
 	/*
 	 * Power Management Flags
 	 */
-	status = acpi_get_handle(device->handle, "_PSC", &handle);
-	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
+	if (acpi_has_method(device->handle, "_PSC"))
 		device->power.flags.explicit_get = 1;
-	status = acpi_get_handle(device->handle, "_IRC", &handle);
-	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
+	if (acpi_has_method(device->handle, "_IRC"))
 		device->power.flags.inrush_current = 1;
 
 	/*
@@ -1469,28 +1447,18 @@ static void acpi_bus_get_power_flags(struct acpi_device *device)
 
 static void acpi_bus_get_flags(struct acpi_device *device)
 {
-	acpi_status status = AE_OK;
-	acpi_handle temp = NULL;
-
 	/* Presence of _STA indicates 'dynamic_status' */
-	status = acpi_get_handle(device->handle, "_STA", &temp);
-	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
+	if (acpi_has_method(device->handle, "_STA"))
 		device->flags.dynamic_status = 1;
 
 	/* Presence of _RMV indicates 'removable' */
-	status = acpi_get_handle(device->handle, "_RMV", &temp);
-	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
+	if (acpi_has_method(device->handle, "_RMV"))
 		device->flags.removable = 1;
 
 	/* Presence of _EJD|_EJ0 indicates 'ejectable' */
-	status = acpi_get_handle(device->handle, "_EJD", &temp);
-	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
+	if (acpi_has_method(device->handle, "_EJD") ||
+	    acpi_has_method(device->handle, "_EJ0"))
 		device->flags.ejectable = 1;
-	else {
-		status = acpi_get_handle(device->handle, "_EJ0", &temp);
-		if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
-			device->flags.ejectable = 1;
-	}
 }
 
 static void acpi_device_get_busid(struct acpi_device *device)
@@ -1539,27 +1507,24 @@ static void acpi_device_get_busid(struct acpi_device *device)
  */
 static int acpi_bay_match(acpi_handle handle)
 {
-	acpi_status status;
-	acpi_handle tmp;
 	acpi_handle phandle;
 
-	status = acpi_get_handle(handle, "_EJ0", &tmp);
-	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
+	if (!acpi_has_method(handle, "_EJ0"))
 		return -ENODEV;
 
-	if ((ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(handle, "_GTF", &tmp))) ||
-		(ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(handle, "_GTM", &tmp))) ||
-		(ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(handle, "_STM", &tmp))) ||
-		(ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(handle, "_SDD", &tmp))))
+	if (acpi_has_method(handle, "_GTF") ||
+	    acpi_has_method(handle, "_GTM") ||
+	    acpi_has_method(handle, "_STM") ||
+	    acpi_has_method(handle, "_SDD"))
 		return 0;
 
 	if (acpi_get_parent(handle, &phandle))
 		return -ENODEV;
 
-        if ((ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(phandle, "_GTF", &tmp))) ||
-                (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(phandle, "_GTM", &tmp))) ||
-                (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(phandle, "_STM", &tmp))) ||
-                (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(phandle, "_SDD", &tmp))))
+	if (acpi_has_method(phandle, "_GTF") ||
+	    acpi_has_method(phandle, "_GTM") ||
+	    acpi_has_method(phandle, "_STM") ||
+	    acpi_has_method(phandle, "_SDD"))
                 return 0;
 
 	return -ENODEV;
@@ -1611,7 +1576,6 @@ static void acpi_add_id(struct acpi_device_pnp *pnp, const char *dev_id)
  */
 static int acpi_ibm_smbus_match(acpi_handle handle)
 {
-	acpi_handle h_dummy;
 	struct acpi_buffer path = {ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL};
 	int result;
 
@@ -1630,9 +1594,9 @@ static int acpi_ibm_smbus_match(acpi_handle handle)
 
 	/* Does it have the necessary (but misnamed) methods? */
 	result = -ENODEV;
-	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(handle, "SBI", &h_dummy)) &&
-	    ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(handle, "SBR", &h_dummy)) &&
-	    ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(handle, "SBW", &h_dummy)))
+	if (acpi_has_method(handle, "SBI") &&
+	    acpi_has_method(handle, "SBR") &&
+	    acpi_has_method(handle, "SBW"))
 		result = 0;
 out:
 	kfree(path.pointer);
@@ -1899,7 +1863,6 @@ static acpi_status acpi_bus_check_add(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl_not_used,
 	struct acpi_device *device = NULL;
 	int type;
 	unsigned long long sta;
-	acpi_status status;
 	int result;
 
 	acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &device);
@@ -1920,10 +1883,8 @@ static acpi_status acpi_bus_check_add(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl_not_used,
 	if (!(sta & ACPI_STA_DEVICE_PRESENT) &&
 	    !(sta & ACPI_STA_DEVICE_FUNCTIONING)) {
 		struct acpi_device_wakeup wakeup;
-		acpi_handle temp;
 
-		status = acpi_get_handle(handle, "_PRW", &temp);
-		if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
+		if (acpi_has_method(handle, "_PRW")) {
 			acpi_bus_extract_wakeup_device_power_package(handle,
 								     &wakeup);
 			acpi_power_resources_list_free(&wakeup.resources);
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/utils.c b/drivers/acpi/utils.c
index 74437130..b08d973 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/utils.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/utils.c
@@ -495,3 +495,18 @@ acpi_handle_printk(const char *level, acpi_handle handle, const char *fmt, ...)
 	kfree(buffer.pointer);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_handle_printk);
+
+/**
+ * acpi_has_method: Check whether @handle has a method named @name
+ * @handle: ACPI device handle
+ * @name: name of object or method
+ *
+ * Check whether @handle has a method named @name.
+ */
+bool acpi_has_method(acpi_handle handle, char *name)
+{
+	acpi_handle tmp;
+
+	return ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(handle, name, &tmp));
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_has_method);
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/video.c b/drivers/acpi/video.c
index 5d7075d..a84533e 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/video.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/video.c
@@ -875,28 +875,21 @@ out:
 
 static void acpi_video_device_find_cap(struct acpi_video_device *device)
 {
-	acpi_handle h_dummy1;
-
-	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(device->dev->handle, "_ADR", &h_dummy1))) {
+	if (acpi_has_method(device->dev->handle, "_ADR"))
 		device->cap._ADR = 1;
-	}
-	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(device->dev->handle, "_BCL", &h_dummy1))) {
+	if (acpi_has_method(device->dev->handle, "_BCL"))
 		device->cap._BCL = 1;
-	}
-	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(device->dev->handle, "_BCM", &h_dummy1))) {
+	if (acpi_has_method(device->dev->handle, "_BCM"))
 		device->cap._BCM = 1;
-	}
-	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(device->dev->handle,"_BQC",&h_dummy1)))
+	if (acpi_has_method(device->dev->handle, "_BQC")) {
 		device->cap._BQC = 1;
-	else if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(device->dev->handle, "_BCQ",
-				&h_dummy1))) {
+	} else if (acpi_has_method(device->dev->handle, "_BCQ")) {
 		printk(KERN_WARNING FW_BUG "_BCQ is used instead of _BQC\n");
 		device->cap._BCQ = 1;
 	}
 
-	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(device->dev->handle, "_DDC", &h_dummy1))) {
+	if (acpi_has_method(device->dev->handle, "_DDC"))
 		device->cap._DDC = 1;
-	}
 
 	if (acpi_video_backlight_support()) {
 		struct backlight_properties props;
@@ -984,26 +977,18 @@ static void acpi_video_device_find_cap(struct acpi_video_device *device)
 
 static void acpi_video_bus_find_cap(struct acpi_video_bus *video)
 {
-	acpi_handle h_dummy1;
-
-	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(video->device->handle, "_DOS", &h_dummy1))) {
+	if (acpi_has_method(video->device->handle, "_DOS"))
 		video->cap._DOS = 1;
-	}
-	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(video->device->handle, "_DOD", &h_dummy1))) {
+	if (acpi_has_method(video->device->handle, "_DOD"))
 		video->cap._DOD = 1;
-	}
-	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(video->device->handle, "_ROM", &h_dummy1))) {
+	if (acpi_has_method(video->device->handle, "_ROM"))
 		video->cap._ROM = 1;
-	}
-	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(video->device->handle, "_GPD", &h_dummy1))) {
+	if (acpi_has_method(video->device->handle, "_GPD"))
 		video->cap._GPD = 1;
-	}
-	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(video->device->handle, "_SPD", &h_dummy1))) {
+	if (acpi_has_method(video->device->handle, "_SPD"))
 		video->cap._SPD = 1;
-	}
-	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(video->device->handle, "_VPO", &h_dummy1))) {
+	if (acpi_has_method(video->device->handle, "_VPO"))
 		video->cap._VPO = 1;
-	}
 }
 
 /*
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c b/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c
index e6bd910..ddefa5f 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c
@@ -51,14 +51,13 @@ acpi_backlight_cap_match(acpi_handle handle, u32 level, void *context,
 			  void **retyurn_value)
 {
 	long *cap = context;
-	acpi_handle h_dummy;
 
-	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(handle, "_BCM", &h_dummy)) &&
-	    ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(handle, "_BCL", &h_dummy))) {
+	if (acpi_has_method(handle, "_BCM") &&
+	    acpi_has_method(handle, "_BCL")) {
 		ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO, "Found generic backlight "
 				  "support\n"));
 		*cap |= ACPI_VIDEO_BACKLIGHT;
-		if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_get_handle(handle, "_BQC", &h_dummy)))
+		if (!acpi_has_method(handle, "_BQC"))
 			printk(KERN_WARNING FW_BUG PREFIX "No _BQC method, "
 				"cannot determine initial brightness\n");
 		/* We have backlight support, no need to scan further */
@@ -77,22 +76,20 @@ acpi_backlight_cap_match(acpi_handle handle, u32 level, void *context,
  */
 long acpi_is_video_device(acpi_handle handle)
 {
-	acpi_handle h_dummy;
 	long video_caps = 0;
 
 	/* Is this device able to support video switching ? */
-	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(handle, "_DOD", &h_dummy)) ||
-	    ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(handle, "_DOS", &h_dummy)))
+	if (acpi_has_method(handle, "_DOD") || acpi_has_method(handle, "_DOS"))
 		video_caps |= ACPI_VIDEO_OUTPUT_SWITCHING;
 
 	/* Is this device able to retrieve a video ROM ? */
-	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(handle, "_ROM", &h_dummy)))
+	if (acpi_has_method(handle, "_ROM"))
 		video_caps |= ACPI_VIDEO_ROM_AVAILABLE;
 
 	/* Is this device able to configure which video head to be POSTed ? */
-	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(handle, "_VPO", &h_dummy)) &&
-	    ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(handle, "_GPD", &h_dummy)) &&
-	    ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(handle, "_SPD", &h_dummy)))
+	if (acpi_has_method(handle, "_VPO") &&
+	    acpi_has_method(handle, "_GPD") &&
+	    acpi_has_method(handle, "_SPD"))
 		video_caps |= ACPI_VIDEO_DEVICE_POSTING;
 
 	/* Only check for backlight functionality if one of the above hit. */
diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
index ca081ac..503b1b7 100644
--- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
+++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
@@ -56,6 +56,9 @@ acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost(acpi_handle handle, u32 source_event,
 
 acpi_status
 acpi_get_physical_device_location(acpi_handle handle, struct acpi_pld_info **pld);
+
+bool acpi_has_method(acpi_handle handle, char *name);
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
 
 #include <linux/proc_fs.h>
-- 
1.8.1.2

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v3 06/10] ACPI: introduce helper function acpi_execute_simple_method()
  2013-06-28 16:24 [PATCH v3 00/10] minor improvements for ACPI dock and acpiphp drivers Jiang Liu
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2013-06-28 16:24 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] ACPI: introduce helper function acpi_has_method() Jiang Liu
@ 2013-06-28 16:24 ` Jiang Liu
  2013-06-28 16:24 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] ACPI: introduce two helper functions to simplify code Jiang Liu
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jiang Liu @ 2013-06-28 16:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J . Wysocki
  Cc: liuj97, Jiang Liu, Yijing Wang, linux-acpi, linux-kernel,
	Len Brown, Zhang Rui

From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>

Introduce helper function acpi_execute_simple_method() to simplify code.

Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
 drivers/acpi/battery.c  |  8 ++------
 drivers/acpi/bus.c      |  6 +-----
 drivers/acpi/power.c    |  4 +---
 drivers/acpi/sleep.c    |  7 ++-----
 drivers/acpi/thermal.c  | 18 ++++--------------
 drivers/acpi/utils.c    | 12 ++++++++++++
 drivers/acpi/video.c    | 17 +++++------------
 include/acpi/acpi_bus.h |  2 ++
 8 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/battery.c b/drivers/acpi/battery.c
index a762716..74669ac 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/battery.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/battery.c
@@ -525,18 +525,14 @@ static int acpi_battery_get_state(struct acpi_battery *battery)
 static int acpi_battery_set_alarm(struct acpi_battery *battery)
 {
 	acpi_status status = 0;
-	union acpi_object arg0 = { .type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER };
-	struct acpi_object_list arg_list = { 1, &arg0 };
 
 	if (!acpi_battery_present(battery) ||
 	    !test_bit(ACPI_BATTERY_ALARM_PRESENT, &battery->flags))
 		return -ENODEV;
 
-	arg0.integer.value = battery->alarm;
-
 	mutex_lock(&battery->lock);
-	status = acpi_evaluate_object(battery->device->handle, "_BTP",
-				 &arg_list, NULL);
+	status = acpi_execute_simple_method(battery->device->handle, "_BTP",
+					    battery->alarm);
 	mutex_unlock(&battery->lock);
 
 	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/bus.c b/drivers/acpi/bus.c
index a5bb33b..a5a032e 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/bus.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/bus.c
@@ -593,8 +593,6 @@ static void acpi_bus_notify(acpi_handle handle, u32 type, void *data)
 static int __init acpi_bus_init_irq(void)
 {
 	acpi_status status;
-	union acpi_object arg = { ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER };
-	struct acpi_object_list arg_list = { 1, &arg };
 	char *message = NULL;
 
 
@@ -623,9 +621,7 @@ static int __init acpi_bus_init_irq(void)
 
 	printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX "Using %s for interrupt routing\n", message);
 
-	arg.integer.value = acpi_irq_model;
-
-	status = acpi_evaluate_object(NULL, "\\_PIC", &arg_list, NULL);
+	status = acpi_execute_simple_method(NULL, "\\_PIC", acpi_irq_model);
 	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) && (status != AE_NOT_FOUND)) {
 		ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status, "Evaluating _PIC"));
 		return -ENODEV;
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/power.c b/drivers/acpi/power.c
index 288bb27..e59ad13 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/power.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/power.c
@@ -637,9 +637,7 @@ int acpi_device_sleep_wake(struct acpi_device *dev,
 	}
 
 	/* Execute _PSW */
-	arg_list.count = 1;
-	in_arg[0].integer.value = enable;
-	status = acpi_evaluate_object(dev->handle, "_PSW", &arg_list, NULL);
+	status = acpi_execute_simple_method(dev->handle, "_PSW", enable);
 	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) && (status != AE_NOT_FOUND)) {
 		printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "_PSW execution failed\n");
 		dev->wakeup.flags.valid = 0;
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
index 187ab61..81b0f03 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
@@ -31,12 +31,9 @@ static u8 sleep_states[ACPI_S_STATE_COUNT];
 
 static void acpi_sleep_tts_switch(u32 acpi_state)
 {
-	union acpi_object in_arg = { ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER };
-	struct acpi_object_list arg_list = { 1, &in_arg };
-	acpi_status status = AE_OK;
+	acpi_status status;
 
-	in_arg.integer.value = acpi_state;
-	status = acpi_evaluate_object(NULL, "\\_TTS", &arg_list, NULL);
+	status = acpi_execute_simple_method(NULL, "\\_TTS", acpi_state);
 	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) && status != AE_NOT_FOUND) {
 		/*
 		 * OS can't evaluate the _TTS object correctly. Some warning
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/thermal.c b/drivers/acpi/thermal.c
index a33821c..94523c7 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/thermal.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/thermal.c
@@ -239,26 +239,16 @@ static int acpi_thermal_get_polling_frequency(struct acpi_thermal *tz)
 
 static int acpi_thermal_set_cooling_mode(struct acpi_thermal *tz, int mode)
 {
-	acpi_status status = AE_OK;
-	union acpi_object arg0 = { ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER };
-	struct acpi_object_list arg_list = { 1, &arg0 };
-	acpi_handle handle = NULL;
-
-
 	if (!tz)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	status = acpi_get_handle(tz->device->handle, "_SCP", &handle);
-	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
+	if (!acpi_has_method(tz->device->handle, "_SCP")) {
 		ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO, "_SCP not present\n"));
 		return -ENODEV;
-	}
-
-	arg0.integer.value = mode;
-
-	status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, NULL, &arg_list, NULL);
-	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
+	} else if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_execute_simple_method(tz->device->handle,
+							   "_SCP", mode))) {
 		return -ENODEV;
+	}
 
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/utils.c b/drivers/acpi/utils.c
index b08d973..87b8588 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/utils.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/utils.c
@@ -510,3 +510,15 @@ bool acpi_has_method(acpi_handle handle, char *name)
 	return ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(handle, name, &tmp));
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_has_method);
+
+acpi_status acpi_execute_simple_method(acpi_handle handle, char *method,
+				       u64 arg)
+{
+	union acpi_object obj = { .type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER };
+	struct acpi_object_list arg_list = { .count = 1, .pointer = &obj, };
+
+	obj.integer.value = arg;
+
+	return acpi_evaluate_object(handle, method, &arg_list, NULL);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_execute_simple_method);
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/video.c b/drivers/acpi/video.c
index a84533e..b862c7f 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/video.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/video.c
@@ -353,14 +353,10 @@ static int
 acpi_video_device_lcd_set_level(struct acpi_video_device *device, int level)
 {
 	int status;
-	union acpi_object arg0 = { ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER };
-	struct acpi_object_list args = { 1, &arg0 };
 	int state;
 
-	arg0.integer.value = level;
-
-	status = acpi_evaluate_object(device->dev->handle, "_BCM",
-				      &args, NULL);
+	status = acpi_execute_simple_method(device->dev->handle,
+					    "_BCM", level);
 	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
 		ACPI_ERROR((AE_INFO, "Evaluating _BCM failed"));
 		return -EIO;
@@ -628,18 +624,15 @@ static int
 acpi_video_bus_DOS(struct acpi_video_bus *video, int bios_flag, int lcd_flag)
 {
 	acpi_status status;
-	union acpi_object arg0 = { ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER };
-	struct acpi_object_list args = { 1, &arg0 };
 
 	if (!video->cap._DOS)
 		return 0;
 
 	if (bios_flag < 0 || bios_flag > 3 || lcd_flag < 0 || lcd_flag > 1)
 		return -EINVAL;
-	arg0.integer.value = (lcd_flag << 2) | bios_flag;
-	video->dos_setting = arg0.integer.value;
-	status = acpi_evaluate_object(video->device->handle, "_DOS",
-		&args, NULL);
+	video->dos_setting = (lcd_flag << 2) | bios_flag;
+	status = acpi_execute_simple_method(video->device->handle, "_DOS",
+					    (lcd_flag << 2) | bios_flag);
 	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
 		return -EIO;
 
diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
index 503b1b7..d3d5fc1 100644
--- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
+++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
@@ -58,6 +58,8 @@ acpi_status
 acpi_get_physical_device_location(acpi_handle handle, struct acpi_pld_info **pld);
 
 bool acpi_has_method(acpi_handle handle, char *name);
+acpi_status acpi_execute_simple_method(acpi_handle handle, char *method,
+				       u64 arg);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
 
-- 
1.8.1.2

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v3 07/10] ACPI: introduce two helper functions to simplify code
  2013-06-28 16:24 [PATCH v3 00/10] minor improvements for ACPI dock and acpiphp drivers Jiang Liu
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2013-06-28 16:24 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] ACPI: introduce helper function acpi_execute_simple_method() Jiang Liu
@ 2013-06-28 16:24 ` Jiang Liu
  2013-06-28 16:24 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] ACPI: change acpi_[bay|dock]_match() in scan.c as global functions Jiang Liu
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jiang Liu @ 2013-06-28 16:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J . Wysocki
  Cc: liuj97, Jiang Liu, Yijing Wang, linux-acpi, linux-kernel,
	Len Brown

From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>

Introduce two helper functions, acpi_evaluate_ej0() and acpi_evaluate_lck()
to simplify code.

Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Cc: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
 drivers/acpi/scan.c     | 31 ++++++-------------------------
 drivers/acpi/utils.c    | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/acpi/acpi_bus.h |  2 ++
 3 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
index 84d88a0..101a267 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
@@ -194,8 +194,6 @@ static acpi_status acpi_bus_online_companions(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl,
 static int acpi_scan_hot_remove(struct acpi_device *device)
 {
 	acpi_handle handle = device->handle;
-	struct acpi_object_list arg_list;
-	union acpi_object arg;
 	struct device *errdev;
 	acpi_status status;
 	unsigned long long sta;
@@ -258,32 +256,15 @@ static int acpi_scan_hot_remove(struct acpi_device *device)
 	put_device(&device->dev);
 	device = NULL;
 
-	if (acpi_has_method(handle, "_LCK")) {
-		arg_list.count = 1;
-		arg_list.pointer = &arg;
-		arg.type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
-		arg.integer.value = 0;
-		acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_LCK", &arg_list, NULL);
-	}
-
-	arg_list.count = 1;
-	arg_list.pointer = &arg;
-	arg.type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
-	arg.integer.value = 1;
-
+	acpi_evaluate_lck(handle, 0);
 	/*
 	 * TBD: _EJD support.
 	 */
-	status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_EJ0", &arg_list, NULL);
-	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
-		if (status == AE_NOT_FOUND) {
-			return -ENODEV;
-		} else {
-			acpi_handle_warn(handle, "Eject failed (0x%x)\n",
-								status);
-			return -EIO;
-		}
-	}
+	status = acpi_evaluate_ej0(handle);
+	if (status == AE_NOT_FOUND)
+		return -ENODEV;
+	else if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
+		return -EIO;
 
 	/*
 	 * Verify if eject was indeed successful.  If not, log an error
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/utils.c b/drivers/acpi/utils.c
index 87b8588..552248b 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/utils.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/utils.c
@@ -522,3 +522,46 @@ acpi_status acpi_execute_simple_method(acpi_handle handle, char *method,
 	return acpi_evaluate_object(handle, method, &arg_list, NULL);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_execute_simple_method);
+
+/**
+ * acpi_evaluate_ej0: Evaluate _EJ0 method for hotplug operations
+ * @handle: ACPI device handle
+ *
+ * Evaluate device's _EJ0 method for hotplug operations.
+ */
+acpi_status acpi_evaluate_ej0(acpi_handle handle)
+{
+	acpi_status status;
+
+	status = acpi_execute_simple_method(handle, "_EJ0", 1);
+	if (status == AE_NOT_FOUND)
+		acpi_handle_warn(handle, "No _EJ0 support for device\n");
+	else if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
+		acpi_handle_warn(handle, "Eject failed (0x%x)\n", status);
+
+	return status;
+}
+
+/**
+ * acpi_evaluate_lck: Evaluate _LCK method to lock/unlock device
+ * @handle: ACPI device handle
+ * @lock: lock device if non-zero, otherwise unlock device
+ *
+ * Evaluate device's _LCK method if present to lock/unlock device
+ */
+acpi_status acpi_evaluate_lck(acpi_handle handle, int lock)
+{
+	acpi_status status;
+
+	status = acpi_execute_simple_method(handle, "_LCK", !!lock);
+	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) && status != AE_NOT_FOUND) {
+		if (lock)
+			acpi_handle_warn(handle,
+				"Locking device failed (0x%x)\n", status);
+		else
+			acpi_handle_warn(handle,
+				"Unlocking device failed (0x%x)\n", status);
+	}
+
+	return status;
+}
diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
index d3d5fc1..6c378d9 100644
--- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
+++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
@@ -60,6 +60,8 @@ acpi_get_physical_device_location(acpi_handle handle, struct acpi_pld_info **pld
 bool acpi_has_method(acpi_handle handle, char *name);
 acpi_status acpi_execute_simple_method(acpi_handle handle, char *method,
 				       u64 arg);
+acpi_status acpi_evaluate_ej0(acpi_handle handle);
+acpi_status acpi_evaluate_lck(acpi_handle handle, int lock);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
 
-- 
1.8.1.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v3 08/10] ACPI: change acpi_[bay|dock]_match() in scan.c as global functions
  2013-06-28 16:24 [PATCH v3 00/10] minor improvements for ACPI dock and acpiphp drivers Jiang Liu
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2013-06-28 16:24 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] ACPI: introduce two helper functions to simplify code Jiang Liu
@ 2013-06-28 16:24 ` Jiang Liu
  2013-06-28 16:24 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] ACPI: simplify dock driver with new helper functions Jiang Liu
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jiang Liu @ 2013-06-28 16:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J . Wysocki
  Cc: liuj97, Jiang Liu, Yijing Wang, linux-acpi, linux-kernel,
	Len Brown

From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>

Function acpi_[bay|dock]_match() in scan.c could be shared with dock.c
to reduce duplicated code, so refine and change them as global functions.
Also add a new function acpi_ata_match() to check whether an ACPI object
device is an ATA device.

Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Cc: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
 drivers/acpi/scan.c     | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
 include/acpi/acpi_bus.h |  3 ++
 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
index 101a267..e7fd101 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
@@ -1481,43 +1481,45 @@ static void acpi_device_get_busid(struct acpi_device *device)
 }
 
 /*
+ * acpi_ata_match - see if an acpi object is an ATA device
+ *
+ * If an acpi object has one of the ACPI ATA methods defined,
+ * then we can safely call it an ATA device.
+ */
+bool acpi_ata_match(acpi_handle handle)
+{
+	return acpi_has_method(handle, "_GTF") ||
+	       acpi_has_method(handle, "_GTM") ||
+	       acpi_has_method(handle, "_STM") ||
+	       acpi_has_method(handle, "_SDD");
+}
+
+/*
  * acpi_bay_match - see if an acpi object is an ejectable driver bay
  *
  * If an acpi object is ejectable and has one of the ACPI ATA methods defined,
  * then we can safely call it an ejectable drive bay
  */
-static int acpi_bay_match(acpi_handle handle)
+bool acpi_bay_match(acpi_handle handle)
 {
 	acpi_handle phandle;
 
 	if (!acpi_has_method(handle, "_EJ0"))
-		return -ENODEV;
+		return false;
+	if (acpi_ata_match(handle))
+		return true;
+	if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_get_parent(handle, &phandle)))
+		return false;
 
-	if (acpi_has_method(handle, "_GTF") ||
-	    acpi_has_method(handle, "_GTM") ||
-	    acpi_has_method(handle, "_STM") ||
-	    acpi_has_method(handle, "_SDD"))
-		return 0;
-
-	if (acpi_get_parent(handle, &phandle))
-		return -ENODEV;
-
-	if (acpi_has_method(phandle, "_GTF") ||
-	    acpi_has_method(phandle, "_GTM") ||
-	    acpi_has_method(phandle, "_STM") ||
-	    acpi_has_method(phandle, "_SDD"))
-                return 0;
-
-	return -ENODEV;
+	return acpi_ata_match(phandle);
 }
 
 /*
  * acpi_dock_match - see if an acpi object has a _DCK method
  */
-static int acpi_dock_match(acpi_handle handle)
+bool acpi_dock_match(acpi_handle handle)
 {
-	acpi_handle tmp;
-	return acpi_get_handle(handle, "_DCK", &tmp);
+	return acpi_has_method(handle, "_DCK");
 }
 
 const char *acpi_device_hid(struct acpi_device *device)
@@ -1555,33 +1557,26 @@ static void acpi_add_id(struct acpi_device_pnp *pnp, const char *dev_id)
  * lacks the SMBUS01 HID and the methods do not have the necessary "_"
  * prefix.  Work around this.
  */
-static int acpi_ibm_smbus_match(acpi_handle handle)
+static bool acpi_ibm_smbus_match(acpi_handle handle)
 {
-	struct acpi_buffer path = {ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL};
-	int result;
+	char node_name[ACPI_PATH_SEGMENT_LENGTH];
+	struct acpi_buffer path = { sizeof(node_name), node_name };
 
 	if (!dmi_name_in_vendors("IBM"))
-		return -ENODEV;
+		return false;
 
 	/* Look for SMBS object */
-	result = acpi_get_name(handle, ACPI_SINGLE_NAME, &path);
-	if (result)
-		return result;
-
-	if (strcmp("SMBS", path.pointer)) {
-		result = -ENODEV;
-		goto out;
-	}
+	if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_get_name(handle, ACPI_SINGLE_NAME, &path)) ||
+	    strcmp("SMBS", path.pointer))
+		return false;
 
 	/* Does it have the necessary (but misnamed) methods? */
-	result = -ENODEV;
 	if (acpi_has_method(handle, "SBI") &&
 	    acpi_has_method(handle, "SBR") &&
 	    acpi_has_method(handle, "SBW"))
-		result = 0;
-out:
-	kfree(path.pointer);
-	return result;
+		return true;
+
+	return false;
 }
 
 static void acpi_set_pnp_ids(acpi_handle handle, struct acpi_device_pnp *pnp,
@@ -1629,11 +1624,11 @@ static void acpi_set_pnp_ids(acpi_handle handle, struct acpi_device_pnp *pnp,
 		 */
 		if (acpi_is_video_device(handle))
 			acpi_add_id(pnp, ACPI_VIDEO_HID);
-		else if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_bay_match(handle)))
+		else if (acpi_bay_match(handle))
 			acpi_add_id(pnp, ACPI_BAY_HID);
-		else if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_dock_match(handle)))
+		else if (acpi_dock_match(handle))
 			acpi_add_id(pnp, ACPI_DOCK_HID);
-		else if (!acpi_ibm_smbus_match(handle))
+		else if (acpi_ibm_smbus_match(handle))
 			acpi_add_id(pnp, ACPI_SMBUS_IBM_HID);
 		else if (list_empty(&pnp->ids) && handle == ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT) {
 			acpi_add_id(pnp, ACPI_BUS_HID); /* \_SB, LNXSYBUS */
diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
index 6c378d9..60fff75 100644
--- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
+++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
@@ -62,6 +62,9 @@ acpi_status acpi_execute_simple_method(acpi_handle handle, char *method,
 				       u64 arg);
 acpi_status acpi_evaluate_ej0(acpi_handle handle);
 acpi_status acpi_evaluate_lck(acpi_handle handle, int lock);
+bool acpi_ata_match(acpi_handle handle);
+bool acpi_bay_match(acpi_handle handle);
+bool acpi_dock_match(acpi_handle handle);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
 
-- 
1.8.1.2

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v3 09/10] ACPI: simplify dock driver with new helper functions
  2013-06-28 16:24 [PATCH v3 00/10] minor improvements for ACPI dock and acpiphp drivers Jiang Liu
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2013-06-28 16:24 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] ACPI: change acpi_[bay|dock]_match() in scan.c as global functions Jiang Liu
@ 2013-06-28 16:24 ` Jiang Liu
  2013-06-28 16:24 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] ACPI: simplify acpiphp " Jiang Liu
  2013-06-28 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 00/10] minor improvements for ACPI dock and acpiphp drivers Rafael J. Wysocki
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jiang Liu @ 2013-06-28 16:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J . Wysocki
  Cc: liuj97, Jiang Liu, Yijing Wang, linux-acpi, linux-kernel,
	Len Brown

From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>

Use new helper functions to simplify ACPI dock driver.

Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Cc: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
 drivers/acpi/dock.c | 122 ++++++----------------------------------------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 110 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/dock.c b/drivers/acpi/dock.c
index 22183c4..31ab001 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/dock.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/dock.c
@@ -226,48 +226,6 @@ find_dock_dependent_device(struct dock_station *ds, acpi_handle handle)
 /*****************************************************************************
  *                         Dock functions                                    *
  *****************************************************************************/
-/**
- * is_dock - see if a device is a dock station
- * @handle: acpi handle of the device
- *
- * If an acpi object has a _DCK method, then it is by definition a dock
- * station, so return true.
- */
-static int is_dock(acpi_handle handle)
-{
-	acpi_status status;
-	acpi_handle tmp;
-
-	status = acpi_get_handle(handle, "_DCK", &tmp);
-	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
-		return 0;
-	return 1;
-}
-
-static int __init is_ejectable(acpi_handle handle)
-{
-	acpi_status status;
-	acpi_handle tmp;
-
-	status = acpi_get_handle(handle, "_EJ0", &tmp);
-	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
-		return 0;
-	return 1;
-}
-
-static int __init is_ata(acpi_handle handle)
-{
-	acpi_handle tmp;
-
-	if ((ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(handle, "_GTF", &tmp))) ||
-	   (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(handle, "_GTM", &tmp))) ||
-	   (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(handle, "_STM", &tmp))) ||
-	   (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(handle, "_SDD", &tmp))))
-		return 1;
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
 static int __init is_battery(acpi_handle handle)
 {
 	struct acpi_device_info *info;
@@ -284,17 +242,13 @@ static int __init is_battery(acpi_handle handle)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static int __init is_ejectable_bay(acpi_handle handle)
+/* Check whether ACPI object is an ejectable battery or disk bay */
+static bool __init is_ejectable_bay(acpi_handle handle)
 {
-	acpi_handle phandle;
+	if (acpi_has_method(handle, "_EJ0") && is_battery(handle))
+		return true;
 
-	if (!is_ejectable(handle))
-		return 0;
-	if (is_battery(handle) || is_ata(handle))
-		return 1;
-	if (!acpi_get_parent(handle, &phandle) && is_ata(phandle))
-		return 1;
-	return 0;
+	return acpi_bay_match(handle);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -312,7 +266,7 @@ int is_dock_device(acpi_handle handle)
 	if (!dock_station_count)
 		return 0;
 
-	if (is_dock(handle))
+	if (acpi_dock_match(handle))
 		return 1;
 
 	list_for_each_entry(dock_station, &dock_stations, sibling)
@@ -447,37 +401,6 @@ static void dock_event(struct dock_station *ds, u32 event, int num)
 }
 
 /**
- * eject_dock - respond to a dock eject request
- * @ds: the dock station
- *
- * This is called after _DCK is called, to execute the dock station's
- * _EJ0 method.
- */
-static void eject_dock(struct dock_station *ds)
-{
-	struct acpi_object_list arg_list;
-	union acpi_object arg;
-	acpi_status status;
-	acpi_handle tmp;
-
-	/* all dock devices should have _EJ0, but check anyway */
-	status = acpi_get_handle(ds->handle, "_EJ0", &tmp);
-	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
-		pr_debug("No _EJ0 support for dock device\n");
-		return;
-	}
-
-	arg_list.count = 1;
-	arg_list.pointer = &arg;
-	arg.type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
-	arg.integer.value = 1;
-
-	status = acpi_evaluate_object(ds->handle, "_EJ0", &arg_list, NULL);
-	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
-		pr_debug("Failed to evaluate _EJ0!\n");
-}
-
-/**
  * handle_dock - handle a dock event
  * @ds: the dock station
  * @dock: to dock, or undock - that is the question
@@ -537,27 +460,6 @@ static inline void complete_undock(struct dock_station *ds)
 	ds->flags &= ~(DOCK_UNDOCKING);
 }
 
-static void dock_lock(struct dock_station *ds, int lock)
-{
-	struct acpi_object_list arg_list;
-	union acpi_object arg;
-	acpi_status status;
-
-	arg_list.count = 1;
-	arg_list.pointer = &arg;
-	arg.type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
-	arg.integer.value = !!lock;
-	status = acpi_evaluate_object(ds->handle, "_LCK", &arg_list, NULL);
-	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) && status != AE_NOT_FOUND) {
-		if (lock)
-			acpi_handle_warn(ds->handle,
-				"Locking device failed (0x%x)\n", status);
-		else
-			acpi_handle_warn(ds->handle,
-				"Unlocking device failed (0x%x)\n", status);
-	}
-}
-
 /**
  * dock_in_progress - see if we are in the middle of handling a dock event
  * @ds: the dock station
@@ -692,8 +594,8 @@ static int handle_eject_request(struct dock_station *ds, u32 event)
 
 	hotplug_dock_devices(ds, ACPI_NOTIFY_EJECT_REQUEST);
 	undock(ds);
-	dock_lock(ds, 0);
-	eject_dock(ds);
+	acpi_evaluate_lck(ds->handle, 0);
+	acpi_evaluate_ej0(ds->handle);
 	if (dock_present(ds)) {
 		acpi_handle_err(ds->handle, "Unable to undock!\n");
 		return -EBUSY;
@@ -752,7 +654,7 @@ static void dock_notify(acpi_handle handle, u32 event, void *data)
 			hotplug_dock_devices(ds, event);
 			complete_dock(ds);
 			dock_event(ds, event, DOCK_EVENT);
-			dock_lock(ds, 1);
+			acpi_evaluate_lck(ds->handle, 1);
 			acpi_update_all_gpes();
 			break;
 		}
@@ -998,9 +900,9 @@ static int __init dock_add(acpi_handle handle)
 	/* we want the dock device to send uevents */
 	dev_set_uevent_suppress(&dd->dev, 0);
 
-	if (is_dock(handle))
+	if (acpi_dock_match(handle))
 		dock_station->flags |= DOCK_IS_DOCK;
-	if (is_ata(handle))
+	if (acpi_ata_match(handle))
 		dock_station->flags |= DOCK_IS_ATA;
 	if (is_battery(handle))
 		dock_station->flags |= DOCK_IS_BAT;
@@ -1043,7 +945,7 @@ err_unregister:
 static __init acpi_status
 find_dock_and_bay(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl, void *context, void **rv)
 {
-	if (is_dock(handle) || is_ejectable_bay(handle))
+	if (acpi_dock_match(handle) || is_ejectable_bay(handle))
 		dock_add(handle);
 
 	return AE_OK;
-- 
1.8.1.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v3 10/10] ACPI: simplify acpiphp driver with new helper functions
  2013-06-28 16:24 [PATCH v3 00/10] minor improvements for ACPI dock and acpiphp drivers Jiang Liu
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2013-06-28 16:24 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] ACPI: simplify dock driver with new helper functions Jiang Liu
@ 2013-06-28 16:24 ` Jiang Liu
  2013-06-28 17:20   ` Bjorn Helgaas
  2013-06-28 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 00/10] minor improvements for ACPI dock and acpiphp drivers Rafael J. Wysocki
  10 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jiang Liu @ 2013-06-28 16:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J . Wysocki
  Cc: liuj97, Jiang Liu, Yijing Wang, linux-acpi, linux-kernel,
	Bjorn Helgaas, Yinghai Lu, Len Brown, linux-pci

From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>

Use new helper functions to simplify acpiphp driver.

Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Cc: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
 drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c | 30 ++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c
index 59df857..a0a7133 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c
@@ -201,7 +201,6 @@ register_slot(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl, void *context, void **rv)
 	struct acpiphp_bridge *bridge = (struct acpiphp_bridge *)context;
 	struct acpiphp_slot *slot;
 	struct acpiphp_func *newfunc;
-	acpi_handle tmp;
 	acpi_status status = AE_OK;
 	unsigned long long adr, sun;
 	int device, function, retval, found = 0;
@@ -232,19 +231,19 @@ register_slot(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl, void *context, void **rv)
 	newfunc->handle = handle;
 	newfunc->function = function;
 
-	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(handle, "_EJ0", &tmp)))
+	if (acpi_has_method(handle, "_EJ0"))
 		newfunc->flags = FUNC_HAS_EJ0;
 
-	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(handle, "_STA", &tmp)))
+	if (acpi_has_method(handle, "_STA"))
 		newfunc->flags |= FUNC_HAS_STA;
 
-	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(handle, "_PS0", &tmp)))
+	if (acpi_has_method(handle, "_PS0"))
 		newfunc->flags |= FUNC_HAS_PS0;
 
-	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(handle, "_PS3", &tmp)))
+	if (acpi_has_method(handle, "_PS3"))
 		newfunc->flags |= FUNC_HAS_PS3;
 
-	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(handle, "_DCK", &tmp)))
+	if (acpi_has_method(handle, "_DCK"))
 		newfunc->flags |= FUNC_HAS_DCK;
 
 	status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "_SUN", NULL, &sun);
@@ -843,25 +842,14 @@ static unsigned int get_slot_status(struct acpiphp_slot *slot)
  */
 int acpiphp_eject_slot(struct acpiphp_slot *slot)
 {
-	acpi_status status;
 	struct acpiphp_func *func;
-	struct acpi_object_list arg_list;
-	union acpi_object arg;
 
 	list_for_each_entry(func, &slot->funcs, sibling) {
 		/* We don't want to call _EJ0 on non-existing functions. */
 		if ((func->flags & FUNC_HAS_EJ0)) {
-			/* _EJ0 method take one argument */
-			arg_list.count = 1;
-			arg_list.pointer = &arg;
-			arg.type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
-			arg.integer.value = 1;
-
-			status = acpi_evaluate_object(func->handle, "_EJ0", &arg_list, NULL);
-			if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
-				warn("%s: _EJ0 failed\n", __func__);
+			if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_evaluate_ej0(func->handle)))
 				return -1;
-			} else
+			else
 				break;
 		}
 	}
@@ -1171,7 +1159,6 @@ static void handle_hotplug_event_func(acpi_handle handle, u32 type,
  */
 void acpiphp_enumerate_slots(struct pci_bus *bus, acpi_handle handle)
 {
-	acpi_handle dummy_handle;
 	struct acpiphp_bridge *bridge;
 
 	if (acpiphp_disabled)
@@ -1200,8 +1187,7 @@ void acpiphp_enumerate_slots(struct pci_bus *bus, acpi_handle handle)
 	get_device(&bus->dev);
 
 	if (!pci_is_root_bus(bridge->pci_bus) &&
-	    ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(bridge->handle,
-					"_EJ0", &dummy_handle))) {
+	    acpi_has_method(bridge->handle, "_EJ0")) {
 		dbg("found ejectable p2p bridge\n");
 		bridge->flags |= BRIDGE_HAS_EJ0;
 		bridge->func = acpiphp_bridge_handle_to_function(handle);
-- 
1.8.1.2

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v3 10/10] ACPI: simplify acpiphp driver with new helper functions
  2013-06-28 16:24 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] ACPI: simplify acpiphp " Jiang Liu
@ 2013-06-28 17:20   ` Bjorn Helgaas
  2013-06-28 18:42     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Bjorn Helgaas @ 2013-06-28 17:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jiang Liu
  Cc: Rafael J . Wysocki, Jiang Liu, Yijing Wang,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Yinghai Lu, Len Brown, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
>
> Use new helper functions to simplify acpiphp driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>

Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

I assume this will be merged via linux-pm with the rest of the series.

> Cc: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>
> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
> Cc: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
> Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> ---
>  drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c | 30 ++++++++----------------------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c
> index 59df857..a0a7133 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c
> @@ -201,7 +201,6 @@ register_slot(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl, void *context, void **rv)
>         struct acpiphp_bridge *bridge = (struct acpiphp_bridge *)context;
>         struct acpiphp_slot *slot;
>         struct acpiphp_func *newfunc;
> -       acpi_handle tmp;
>         acpi_status status = AE_OK;
>         unsigned long long adr, sun;
>         int device, function, retval, found = 0;
> @@ -232,19 +231,19 @@ register_slot(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl, void *context, void **rv)
>         newfunc->handle = handle;
>         newfunc->function = function;
>
> -       if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(handle, "_EJ0", &tmp)))
> +       if (acpi_has_method(handle, "_EJ0"))
>                 newfunc->flags = FUNC_HAS_EJ0;
>
> -       if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(handle, "_STA", &tmp)))
> +       if (acpi_has_method(handle, "_STA"))
>                 newfunc->flags |= FUNC_HAS_STA;
>
> -       if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(handle, "_PS0", &tmp)))
> +       if (acpi_has_method(handle, "_PS0"))
>                 newfunc->flags |= FUNC_HAS_PS0;
>
> -       if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(handle, "_PS3", &tmp)))
> +       if (acpi_has_method(handle, "_PS3"))
>                 newfunc->flags |= FUNC_HAS_PS3;
>
> -       if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(handle, "_DCK", &tmp)))
> +       if (acpi_has_method(handle, "_DCK"))
>                 newfunc->flags |= FUNC_HAS_DCK;
>
>         status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "_SUN", NULL, &sun);
> @@ -843,25 +842,14 @@ static unsigned int get_slot_status(struct acpiphp_slot *slot)
>   */
>  int acpiphp_eject_slot(struct acpiphp_slot *slot)
>  {
> -       acpi_status status;
>         struct acpiphp_func *func;
> -       struct acpi_object_list arg_list;
> -       union acpi_object arg;
>
>         list_for_each_entry(func, &slot->funcs, sibling) {
>                 /* We don't want to call _EJ0 on non-existing functions. */
>                 if ((func->flags & FUNC_HAS_EJ0)) {
> -                       /* _EJ0 method take one argument */
> -                       arg_list.count = 1;
> -                       arg_list.pointer = &arg;
> -                       arg.type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
> -                       arg.integer.value = 1;
> -
> -                       status = acpi_evaluate_object(func->handle, "_EJ0", &arg_list, NULL);
> -                       if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> -                               warn("%s: _EJ0 failed\n", __func__);
> +                       if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_evaluate_ej0(func->handle)))
>                                 return -1;
> -                       } else
> +                       else
>                                 break;
>                 }
>         }
> @@ -1171,7 +1159,6 @@ static void handle_hotplug_event_func(acpi_handle handle, u32 type,
>   */
>  void acpiphp_enumerate_slots(struct pci_bus *bus, acpi_handle handle)
>  {
> -       acpi_handle dummy_handle;
>         struct acpiphp_bridge *bridge;
>
>         if (acpiphp_disabled)
> @@ -1200,8 +1187,7 @@ void acpiphp_enumerate_slots(struct pci_bus *bus, acpi_handle handle)
>         get_device(&bus->dev);
>
>         if (!pci_is_root_bus(bridge->pci_bus) &&
> -           ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(bridge->handle,
> -                                       "_EJ0", &dummy_handle))) {
> +           acpi_has_method(bridge->handle, "_EJ0")) {
>                 dbg("found ejectable p2p bridge\n");
>                 bridge->flags |= BRIDGE_HAS_EJ0;
>                 bridge->func = acpiphp_bridge_handle_to_function(handle);
> --
> 1.8.1.2
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] minor improvements for ACPI dock and acpiphp drivers
  2013-06-28 16:24 [PATCH v3 00/10] minor improvements for ACPI dock and acpiphp drivers Jiang Liu
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2013-06-28 16:24 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] ACPI: simplify acpiphp " Jiang Liu
@ 2013-06-28 18:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2013-06-28 18:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jiang Liu; +Cc: Jiang Liu, Yijing Wang, linux-acpi, linux-kernel

On Saturday, June 29, 2013 12:24:33 AM Jiang Liu wrote:
> From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
> 
> This is an following up patchset of "[PATCH 0/3] ACPI / dock / PCI: Fix
> problems with dock and PCI hotplug" with minor code cleanups and
> refinements. It applies to
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git linux-next
> 
> Due to hardware resource limitation, I have only done compilation and
> boot tests.
> 
> V2->V3:
>     The first four patches are the same as previous version and rework
>     all other patches according to review comments.
> 
> Jiang Liu (10):
>   ACPI, DOCK: avoid initializing acpi_dock_notifier_list multiple times
>   ACPI, DOCK: kill redundant spin lock in dock station object
>   ACPI, DOCK: mark initialization functions with __init
>   ACPI, DOCK: simplify implementation of dock_create_acpi_device()
>   ACPI: introduce helper function acpi_has_method()
>   ACPI: introduce helper function acpi_execute_simple_method()
>   ACPI: introduce two helper functions to simplify code
>   ACPI: change acpi_[bay|dock]_match() in scan.c as global functions
>   ACPI: simplify dock driver with new helper functions
>   ACPI: simplify acpiphp driver with new helper functions
> 
>  drivers/acpi/battery.c             |  19 +---
>  drivers/acpi/bus.c                 |   6 +-
>  drivers/acpi/dock.c                | 152 ++++-------------------------
>  drivers/acpi/ec.c                  |   4 +-
>  drivers/acpi/power.c               |   4 +-
>  drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c   |  22 ++---
>  drivers/acpi/resource.c            |   4 +-
>  drivers/acpi/scan.c                | 189 +++++++++++++------------------------
>  drivers/acpi/sleep.c               |   7 +-
>  drivers/acpi/thermal.c             |  18 +---
>  drivers/acpi/utils.c               |  70 ++++++++++++++
>  drivers/acpi/video.c               |  56 ++++-------
>  drivers/acpi/video_detect.c        |  19 ++--
>  drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c |  30 ++----
>  include/acpi/acpi_bus.h            |  10 ++
>  15 files changed, 218 insertions(+), 392 deletions(-)

Looks good, thanks!

I'll queue all 10 up for 3.12.

Rafael


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v3 10/10] ACPI: simplify acpiphp driver with new helper functions
  2013-06-28 17:20   ` Bjorn Helgaas
@ 2013-06-28 18:42     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2013-06-28 18:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bjorn Helgaas
  Cc: Jiang Liu, Jiang Liu, Yijing Wang, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yinghai Lu, Len Brown,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org

On Friday, June 28, 2013 11:20:21 AM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com> wrote:
> > From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
> >
> > Use new helper functions to simplify acpiphp driver.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> 
> I assume this will be merged via linux-pm with the rest of the series.

Yup, into 3.12.

Thanks,
Rafael


> > Cc: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> > Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
> > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
> > Cc: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
> > Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c | 30 ++++++++----------------------
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c
> > index 59df857..a0a7133 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c
> > @@ -201,7 +201,6 @@ register_slot(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl, void *context, void **rv)
> >         struct acpiphp_bridge *bridge = (struct acpiphp_bridge *)context;
> >         struct acpiphp_slot *slot;
> >         struct acpiphp_func *newfunc;
> > -       acpi_handle tmp;
> >         acpi_status status = AE_OK;
> >         unsigned long long adr, sun;
> >         int device, function, retval, found = 0;
> > @@ -232,19 +231,19 @@ register_slot(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl, void *context, void **rv)
> >         newfunc->handle = handle;
> >         newfunc->function = function;
> >
> > -       if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(handle, "_EJ0", &tmp)))
> > +       if (acpi_has_method(handle, "_EJ0"))
> >                 newfunc->flags = FUNC_HAS_EJ0;
> >
> > -       if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(handle, "_STA", &tmp)))
> > +       if (acpi_has_method(handle, "_STA"))
> >                 newfunc->flags |= FUNC_HAS_STA;
> >
> > -       if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(handle, "_PS0", &tmp)))
> > +       if (acpi_has_method(handle, "_PS0"))
> >                 newfunc->flags |= FUNC_HAS_PS0;
> >
> > -       if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(handle, "_PS3", &tmp)))
> > +       if (acpi_has_method(handle, "_PS3"))
> >                 newfunc->flags |= FUNC_HAS_PS3;
> >
> > -       if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(handle, "_DCK", &tmp)))
> > +       if (acpi_has_method(handle, "_DCK"))
> >                 newfunc->flags |= FUNC_HAS_DCK;
> >
> >         status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "_SUN", NULL, &sun);
> > @@ -843,25 +842,14 @@ static unsigned int get_slot_status(struct acpiphp_slot *slot)
> >   */
> >  int acpiphp_eject_slot(struct acpiphp_slot *slot)
> >  {
> > -       acpi_status status;
> >         struct acpiphp_func *func;
> > -       struct acpi_object_list arg_list;
> > -       union acpi_object arg;
> >
> >         list_for_each_entry(func, &slot->funcs, sibling) {
> >                 /* We don't want to call _EJ0 on non-existing functions. */
> >                 if ((func->flags & FUNC_HAS_EJ0)) {
> > -                       /* _EJ0 method take one argument */
> > -                       arg_list.count = 1;
> > -                       arg_list.pointer = &arg;
> > -                       arg.type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
> > -                       arg.integer.value = 1;
> > -
> > -                       status = acpi_evaluate_object(func->handle, "_EJ0", &arg_list, NULL);
> > -                       if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> > -                               warn("%s: _EJ0 failed\n", __func__);
> > +                       if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_evaluate_ej0(func->handle)))
> >                                 return -1;
> > -                       } else
> > +                       else
> >                                 break;
> >                 }
> >         }
> > @@ -1171,7 +1159,6 @@ static void handle_hotplug_event_func(acpi_handle handle, u32 type,
> >   */
> >  void acpiphp_enumerate_slots(struct pci_bus *bus, acpi_handle handle)
> >  {
> > -       acpi_handle dummy_handle;
> >         struct acpiphp_bridge *bridge;
> >
> >         if (acpiphp_disabled)
> > @@ -1200,8 +1187,7 @@ void acpiphp_enumerate_slots(struct pci_bus *bus, acpi_handle handle)
> >         get_device(&bus->dev);
> >
> >         if (!pci_is_root_bus(bridge->pci_bus) &&
> > -           ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(bridge->handle,
> > -                                       "_EJ0", &dummy_handle))) {
> > +           acpi_has_method(bridge->handle, "_EJ0")) {
> >                 dbg("found ejectable p2p bridge\n");
> >                 bridge->flags |= BRIDGE_HAS_EJ0;
> >                 bridge->func = acpiphp_bridge_handle_to_function(handle);
> > --
> > 1.8.1.2
> >
-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-06-28 18:42 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-06-28 16:24 [PATCH v3 00/10] minor improvements for ACPI dock and acpiphp drivers Jiang Liu
2013-06-28 16:24 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] ACPI, DOCK: avoid initializing acpi_dock_notifier_list multiple times Jiang Liu
2013-06-28 16:24 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] ACPI, DOCK: kill redundant spin lock in dock station object Jiang Liu
2013-06-28 16:24 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] ACPI, DOCK: mark initialization functions with __init Jiang Liu
2013-06-28 16:24 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] ACPI, DOCK: simplify implementation of dock_create_acpi_device() Jiang Liu
2013-06-28 16:24 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] ACPI: introduce helper function acpi_has_method() Jiang Liu
2013-06-28 16:24 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] ACPI: introduce helper function acpi_execute_simple_method() Jiang Liu
2013-06-28 16:24 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] ACPI: introduce two helper functions to simplify code Jiang Liu
2013-06-28 16:24 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] ACPI: change acpi_[bay|dock]_match() in scan.c as global functions Jiang Liu
2013-06-28 16:24 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] ACPI: simplify dock driver with new helper functions Jiang Liu
2013-06-28 16:24 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] ACPI: simplify acpiphp " Jiang Liu
2013-06-28 17:20   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-06-28 18:42     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-28 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 00/10] minor improvements for ACPI dock and acpiphp drivers Rafael J. Wysocki

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).