linux-acpi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Guthro <benjamin.guthro@citrix.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Cc: Ben Guthro <benjamin.guthro@citrix.com>,
	Richard L Maliszewski <richard.l.maliszewski@intel.com>,
	Gang Wei <gang.wei@intel.com>, Shane Wang <shane.wang@intel.com>,
	Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>,
	tboot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [PATCH v8 0/3] Xen/ACPI: support sleep state entering on hardware reduced systems
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 08:24:51 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1375187094-19357-1-git-send-email-benjamin.guthro@citrix.com> (raw)

In version 3.4 acpi_os_prepare_sleep() got introduced in parallel with
reduced hardware sleep support, and the two changes didn't get
synchronized: The new code doesn't call the hook function (if so
requested). Fix this, requiring a new callback to be added to acpica
to be called back during this reduced hardware sleep.

This requires adjusting TXT, but the adjustments only go as far as
failing the extended mode call (since, looking at the TXT interface,
there doesn't even appear to be precautions to deal with that
alternative interface).

The xen hypervisor change underlying this is commit 62d1a69 ("ACPI: support
v5 (reduced HW) sleep interface") on the master branch of
git://xenbits.xen.org/xen.git.

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Guthro <benjamin.guthro@citrix.com>
Cc: Richard L Maliszewski <richard.l.maliszewski@intel.com>
Cc: Gang Wei <gang.wei@intel.com>
Cc: Shane Wang <shane.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tboot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net 

v2: Extend description to include reference to hypervisor side change
v3: Split into multiple patches, separating subsystems
    Remove bool parameters, in favor of u8
v4: Remove linux/acpi.h dependencies
    Further patch split to break out acpica from OSL
    More bool vs u8 fixes
v5: Fix build of consumers of acpi_os_prepare_sleep() interface change,
    so intermediate builds of partial patch series will not fail.
v6: Rebased to linux-pm linux-next branch
    Added warning in tboot early return code
    Added Reviewed-by lines
v7: Add separate acpi_os_prepare_extended_sleep() interface
    Remove OSL acpica changes introduced in v4
v8: Return meaningful error code in tboot error path

Ben Guthro (3):
  x86/acpi: Introduce acpi_os_prepare_extended_sleep callback for
    extended sleep path
  x86/tboot: Fail extended mode reduced hardware sleep
  xen/acpi: notify xen when reduced hardware sleep is available

 arch/x86/kernel/tboot.c          |   12 +++++++++++
 drivers/acpi/acpica/hwesleep.c   |    9 +++++++++
 drivers/acpi/osl.c               |   24 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/xen/acpi.c               |   41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 include/linux/acpi.h             |    7 +++++++
 include/xen/acpi.h               |    8 ++++++--
 include/xen/interface/platform.h |    7 ++++---
 7 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

-- 
1.7.9.5


             reply	other threads:[~2013-07-30 12:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-30 12:24 Ben Guthro [this message]
2013-07-30 12:24 ` [PATCH v8 1/3] x86/acpi: Introduce acpi_os_prepare_extended_sleep callback for extended sleep path Ben Guthro
2013-07-30 12:24 ` [PATCH v8 2/3] x86/tboot: Fail extended mode reduced hardware sleep Ben Guthro
2013-07-30 13:14   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-07-30 13:22     ` [PATCH v8.1] " Ben Guthro
2013-07-30 13:34       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-07-30 13:26         ` Ben Guthro
2013-07-30 12:24 ` [PATCH v8 3/3] xen/acpi: notify xen when reduced hardware sleep is available Ben Guthro
2013-07-30 13:16 ` [PATCH v8 0/3] Xen/ACPI: support sleep state entering on hardware reduced systems Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1375187094-19357-1-git-send-email-benjamin.guthro@citrix.com \
    --to=benjamin.guthro@citrix.com \
    --cc=gang.wei@intel.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=richard.l.maliszewski@intel.com \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
    --cc=shane.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=tboot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).