From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
patches@linaro.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org,
linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org, Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>,
Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/6] x86: simplify _acpi_map_lsapic()
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2013 18:15:58 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1377944162-18574-3-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1377944162-18574-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
In acpi_register_lapic(), it will generates a new logical cpu
number and maps to the local APIC id, this logical cpu number
can be returned to simplify _acpi_map_lsapic() implementation.
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/mpspec.h | 2 +-
arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c | 48 +++++++++++++----------------------------
arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c | 8 ++++---
3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mpspec.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mpspec.h
index 626cf70..3142a94 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mpspec.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mpspec.h
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static inline void early_reserve_e820_mpc_new(void) { }
#define default_get_smp_config x86_init_uint_noop
#endif
-void generic_processor_info(int apicid, int version);
+int generic_processor_info(int apicid, int version);
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
extern void mp_register_ioapic(int id, u32 address, u32 gsi_base);
extern void mp_override_legacy_irq(u8 bus_irq, u8 polarity, u8 trigger,
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
index 3e186d1..ca73370 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
@@ -195,24 +195,31 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_madt(struct acpi_table_header *table)
return 0;
}
-static void acpi_register_lapic(int id, u8 enabled)
+/**
+ * acpi_register_lapic - register a local apic and generates a logic cpu number
+ * @id: local apic id to register
+ * @enabled: this cpu is enabled or not
+ *
+ * Returns the logic cpu number which maps to the local apic
+ */
+static int acpi_register_lapic(int id, u8 enabled)
{
unsigned int ver = 0;
if (id >= (MAX_LOCAL_APIC-1)) {
printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX "skipped apicid that is too big\n");
- return;
+ return -1;
}
if (!enabled) {
++disabled_cpus;
- return;
+ return -1;
}
if (boot_cpu_physical_apicid != -1U)
ver = apic_version[boot_cpu_physical_apicid];
- generic_processor_info(id, ver);
+ return generic_processor_info(id, ver);
}
static int __init
@@ -622,44 +629,19 @@ static void acpi_map_cpu2node(acpi_handle handle, int cpu, int physid)
static int _acpi_map_lsapic(acpi_handle handle, int physid, int *pcpu)
{
- cpumask_var_t tmp_map, new_map;
int cpu;
- int retval = -ENOMEM;
-
- if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&tmp_map, GFP_KERNEL))
- goto out;
- if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&new_map, GFP_KERNEL))
- goto free_tmp_map;
-
- cpumask_copy(tmp_map, cpu_present_mask);
- acpi_register_lapic(physid, ACPI_MADT_ENABLED);
-
- /*
- * If acpi_register_lapic successfully generates a new logical cpu
- * number, then the following will get us exactly what was mapped
- */
- cpumask_andnot(new_map, cpu_present_mask, tmp_map);
- if (cpumask_empty(new_map)) {
+ cpu = acpi_register_lapic(physid, ACPI_MADT_ENABLED);
+ if (cpu == -1) {
printk ("Unable to map lapic to logical cpu number\n");
- retval = -EINVAL;
- goto free_new_map;
+ return -EINVAL;
}
acpi_processor_set_pdc(handle);
-
- cpu = cpumask_first(new_map);
acpi_map_cpu2node(handle, cpu, physid);
*pcpu = cpu;
- retval = 0;
-
-free_new_map:
- free_cpumask_var(new_map);
-free_tmp_map:
- free_cpumask_var(tmp_map);
-out:
- return retval;
+ return 0;
}
/* wrapper to silence section mismatch warning */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
index eca89c5..87128778 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
@@ -2107,7 +2107,7 @@ void disconnect_bsp_APIC(int virt_wire_setup)
apic_write(APIC_LVT1, value);
}
-void generic_processor_info(int apicid, int version)
+int generic_processor_info(int apicid, int version)
{
int cpu, max = nr_cpu_ids;
bool boot_cpu_detected = physid_isset(boot_cpu_physical_apicid,
@@ -2127,7 +2127,7 @@ void generic_processor_info(int apicid, int version)
" Processor %d/0x%x ignored.\n", max, thiscpu, apicid);
disabled_cpus++;
- return;
+ return -1;
}
if (num_processors >= nr_cpu_ids) {
@@ -2138,7 +2138,7 @@ void generic_processor_info(int apicid, int version)
" Processor %d/0x%x ignored.\n", max, thiscpu, apicid);
disabled_cpus++;
- return;
+ return -1;
}
num_processors++;
@@ -2183,6 +2183,8 @@ void generic_processor_info(int apicid, int version)
#endif
set_cpu_possible(cpu, true);
set_cpu_present(cpu, true);
+
+ return cpu;
}
int hard_smp_processor_id(void)
--
1.7.9.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-31 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-31 10:15 [PATCH 1/6] ACPI / processor: Introduce apic_id in struct processor to save parsed APIC id Hanjun Guo
2013-08-31 10:15 ` [PATCH 2/6] ACPI / processor: use apic_id and remove duplicated _MAT evaluation Hanjun Guo
2013-08-31 10:15 ` Hanjun Guo [this message]
2013-08-31 20:14 ` [PATCH 3/6] x86: simplify _acpi_map_lsapic() Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-02 2:13 ` Hanjun Guo
2013-08-31 10:15 ` [PATCH 4/6] ACPI / processor: remove some dead code in acpi_processor_get_info() Hanjun Guo
2013-08-31 10:16 ` [PATCH 5/6] ACPI / processor: remove unnecessary if (!pr) check Hanjun Guo
2013-08-31 10:16 ` [PATCH 6/6] ACPI / processor: Remove outdated comments Hanjun Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1377944162-18574-3-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--to=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=jiang.liu@huawei.com \
--cc=linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).