From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
patches@linaro.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org,
linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org, Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 6/6] ACPI / processor: Remove outdated comments
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 11:57:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1378094259-5922-7-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1378094259-5922-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
acpi_get_processor_id() can be find nowhere, and the acpi id
is synchronized to APIC id when acpi_get_cpuid() is called, so
the comments can be removed.
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
---
drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 5 -----
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
index 7ce0750..da42892 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
@@ -240,11 +240,6 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device)
return -ENODEV;
}
- /*
- * TBD: Synch processor ID (via LAPIC/LSAPIC structures) on SMP.
- * >>> 'acpi_get_processor_id(acpi_id, &id)' in
- * arch/xxx/acpi.c
- */
pr->acpi_id = object.processor.proc_id;
} else {
/*
--
1.7.9.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-02 3:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-02 3:57 [PATCH v2 0/6] Remove the duplicated _MAT evaluation and simplify _acpi_map_lsapic() Hanjun Guo
2013-09-02 3:57 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] ACPI / processor: Introduce apic_id in struct processor to save parsed APIC id Hanjun Guo
2013-09-02 3:57 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] ACPI / processor: use apic_id and remove duplicated _MAT evaluation Hanjun Guo
2013-09-02 3:57 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] x86 / ACPI: simplify _acpi_map_lsapic() Hanjun Guo
2013-09-02 3:57 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] ACPI / processor: remove some dead code in acpi_processor_get_info() Hanjun Guo
2013-09-02 3:57 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] ACPI / processor: remove unnecessary if (!pr) check Hanjun Guo
2013-09-02 3:57 ` Hanjun Guo [this message]
2013-09-02 12:12 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] Remove the duplicated _MAT evaluation and simplify _acpi_map_lsapic() Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1378094259-5922-7-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--to=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=jiang.liu@huawei.com \
--cc=linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).