From: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
To: Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug report] Warning when hot-add an ACPI0004 device.
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 09:11:52 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1378998712.12538.18.camel@misato.fc.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52314A89.2060809@cn.fujitsu.com>
On Thu, 2013-09-12 at 13:00 +0800, Tang Chen wrote:
> Hi Rafael, Toshi,
>
> When we hot-add an ACPI0004 device, we got the following warning:
>
> acpi ACPI0004:01: Attempt to re-insert
>
> The ACPI0004 device is a System Board in Fujitsu server, which has two
> numa nodes (processors and memory).
>
> It seems that we reserved the ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_CHECK event twice in
> acpi_hotplug_notify_cb().
>
>
> According to bisect, this happens after the following commit:
>
> From 68a67f6c78b80525d9b3c6672e7782de95e56a83 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2013 23:05:55 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] ACPI / container: Use common hotplug code
>
> Switch the ACPI container driver to using common device hotplug code
> introduced previously. This reduces the driver down to a trivial
> definition and registration of a struct acpi_scan_handler object.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
> Tested-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/container.c | 146
> ++++-------------------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 136 deletions(-)
>
>
> I'm now investigating this problem. If you have any idea about why this
> happens, please let me know.
With the above change, container devices use the common notify handler,
which logs the warning message in question when it receives device check
twice on a same device. Before the change, the container-specific
notify handler did not log this message in the same case (but considered
it as an eject request).
So, I suspect that you are getting device check twice regardless of the
kernel change. Can you check KERN_DEBUG messages to see if that is the
case? The notify handler logs all events with KERN_DEBUG.
Thanks,
-Toshi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-12 15:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-12 5:00 [Bug report] Warning when hot-add an ACPI0004 device Tang Chen
2013-09-12 15:11 ` Toshi Kani [this message]
2013-09-25 10:31 ` Gu Zheng
2013-09-25 14:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-26 2:33 ` Gu Zheng
2013-09-25 22:24 ` Toshi Kani
2013-09-26 2:33 ` Gu Zheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1378998712.12538.18.camel@misato.fc.hp.com \
--to=toshi.kani@hp.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox