From: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
To: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: Fix modalias for ACPI enumerated I2C devices
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 19:44:44 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1381837484.2080.66.camel@rzhang1-mobl4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1381754856.2034.34.camel@rzhang1-mobl4>
On Mon, 2013-10-14 at 20:47 +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-10-14 at 14:18 +0300, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
> > On 10/14/2013 12:23 PM, Zhang Rui wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2013-10-10 at 17:17 +0300, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
> > >> There is a minor fault about ACPI enumerated I2C devices with their modalias
> > >> attribute. Now modalias is set by device instance not by hardware ID.
> > >> For example "i2c:INTABCD:00", "i2c:INTABCD:01" etc.
> > >>
> > >> This means each device instance gets different modalias which does match
> > >> with generated modules.alias. Currently this is not problem as matching can
> > >> happen also with "acpi:INTABCD" modalias.
> > >>
> > > IMO, this is not the proper fix for the modalias problem because ACPI
> > > enumerated I2C device may have compatible ids.
> > > Instead, we should export all the compatible ids as the modules alias of
> > > the ACPI enumerated I2C device.
> > >
> > > can you please take a look at the patch I sent out earlier?
> > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/3034991/
> > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/3035041/
> > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/3035021/
> > I see. This makes sense as it avoids that same device has two different
> > modaliases from both acpi and other subsystem.
> >
> > How about modalias nodes in sysfs, should they also reflect what is
> > matching uvent?
> >
> good catch, will fix "modalias" as well in next version.
Hi,
I have a question about the device "uevent" and "modalias" sysfs
attributes.
what is the relationship between these two?
Am I right to say that, if there is the "MODALIAS" field in uevent file,
this field must be consistent with the content in "modalias" attribute?
I checked the code in drivers/base/platform.c,
static ssize_t modalias_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute
*a,
char *buf)
{
struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
int len = snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "platform:%s\n", pdev->name);
return (len >= PAGE_SIZE) ? (PAGE_SIZE - 1) : len;
}
static int platform_uevent(struct device *dev, struct kobj_uevent_env
*env)
{
struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
int rc;
/* Some devices have extra OF data and an OF-style MODALIAS */
rc = of_device_uevent_modalias(dev, env);
if (rc != -ENODEV)
return rc;
add_uevent_var(env, "MODALIAS=%s%s", PLATFORM_MODULE_PREFIX,
pdev->name);
return 0;
}
This means that the OF-style MODALIAS is not shown in "modalias" sysfs
attribute.
is this a bug?
thanks,
rui
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-15 11:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-10 14:17 [PATCH] i2c: Fix modalias for ACPI enumerated I2C devices Jarkko Nikula
[not found] ` <1381414669-26115-1-git-send-email-jarkko.nikula-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
2013-10-11 14:49 ` Mika Westerberg
[not found] ` <20131011144946.GS3521-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2013-10-11 22:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-10-12 5:04 ` Mika Westerberg
[not found] ` <20131012050413.GY3521-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2013-10-12 13:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
[not found] ` <2878883.SYGmCkS5Bt-sKB8Sp2ER+y1GS7QM15AGw@public.gmane.org>
2013-10-12 16:18 ` Mika Westerberg
2013-10-14 6:45 ` Jarkko Nikula
[not found] ` <525B9321.5000906-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
2013-10-14 8:16 ` Mika Westerberg
2013-10-14 6:34 ` Jarkko Nikula
2013-10-14 8:13 ` Mika Westerberg
2013-10-14 9:23 ` Zhang Rui
2013-10-14 11:18 ` Jarkko Nikula
2013-10-14 12:47 ` Zhang Rui
2013-10-15 11:44 ` Zhang Rui [this message]
2013-10-15 20:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
[not found] ` <12043671.FjbAvIiH5B-sKB8Sp2ER+y1GS7QM15AGw@public.gmane.org>
2013-10-15 20:48 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-10-15 21:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-10-15 23:31 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-10-15 23:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-10-16 0:04 ` Grant Likely
[not found] ` <CACxGe6v3JHLKHqBXux=1mgm227S2dLafaqohKvzqsw1uo6tHyA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2013-10-16 0:10 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-10-16 7:16 ` Jarkko Nikula
[not found] ` <20131015204829.GA5212-U8xfFu+wG4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2013-10-15 21:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1381837484.2080.66.camel@rzhang1-mobl4 \
--to=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).