From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Berg Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] gpio / ACPI: convert users to gpiod_* and drop acpi_gpio.h Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 16:01:20 +0100 Message-ID: <1385046080.14273.8.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> References: <1385045153-25160-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([144.76.43.152]:50424 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751613Ab3KUPBc (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Nov 2013 10:01:32 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1385045153-25160-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Mika Westerberg Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linus Walleij , Chris Ball , Rhyland Klein , Adrian Hunter , Alexandre Courbot , Mathias Nyman , Rob Landley , Heikki Krogerus , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2013-11-21 at 16:45 +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote: > I suppose it would make sense to merge the whole series via GPIO or ACPI > trees because there's a dependency that the first two patches need to be > applied before last three. Otherwise the drivers in question fail to > compile. Totally. I wouldn't want to track it all, so ack for rfkill. Not that I understand/know that code well anyway. johannes