From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
To: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>,
Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Bugfix v5] x86/PCI/ACPI: Fix regression caused by commit 63f1789ec716
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 11:08:58 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1429499338-16967-1-git-send-email-jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> (raw)
An IO port or MMIO resource assigned to a PCI host bridge may be
consumed by the host bridge itself or available to its child
bus/devices. On x86 and IA64 platforms, all IO port and MMIO
resources are assumed to be available to child bus/devices
except one special case:
IO port [0xCF8-0xCFF] is consumed by the host bridge itself
to access PCI configuration space.
But the ACPI and PCI Firmware specifications haven't provided a method
to tell whether a resource is consumed by the host bridge itself.
So before commit 593669c2ac0f ("x86/PCI/ACPI: Use common ACPI resource
interfaces to simplify implementation"), arch/x86/pci/acpi.c ignored
all IO port resources defined by acpi_resource_io and
acpi_resource_fixed_io to filter out IO ports consumed by the host
bridge itself.
Commit 593669c2ac0f ("x86/PCI/ACPI: Use common ACPI resource interfaces
to simplify implementation")started accepting all IO port and MMIO
resources, which caused a regression that IO port resources consumed
by the host bridge itself became available to its child devices.
Then commit 63f1789ec716 ("x86/PCI/ACPI: Ignore resources consumed by
host bridge itself") ignored resources consumed by the host bridge
itself by checking the IORESOURCE_WINDOW flag, which accidently removed
MMIO resources defined by acpi_resource_memory24, acpi_resource_memory32
and acpi_resource_fixed_memory32.
So revert to the behavior before v3.19 to fix the regression.
There is also a discussion about ignoring the Producer/Consumer flag on
IA64 platforms at:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/461633/
Related ACPI table are archived at:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94221
Fixes: 63f1789ec716("Ignore resources consumed by host bridge itself")
Reported-by: Bernhard Thaler <bernhard.thaler@wvnet.at>
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/pci/acpi.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
drivers/acpi/resource.c | 6 +++++-
2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c b/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
index e4695985f9de..fc2da98985c3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
+++ b/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
@@ -332,12 +332,32 @@ static void probe_pci_root_info(struct pci_root_info *info,
{
int ret;
struct resource_entry *entry, *tmp;
+ unsigned long res_flags;
sprintf(info->name, "PCI Bus %04x:%02x", domain, busnum);
info->bridge = device;
+
+ /*
+ * An IO or MMIO resource assigned to PCI host bridge may be consumed
+ * by the host bridge itself or available to its child bus/devices.
+ * On x86 and IA64 platforms, all IO and MMIO resources are assumed to
+ * be available to child bus/devices except one special case:
+ * IO port [0xCF8-0xCFF] is consumed by host bridge itself to
+ * access PCI configuration space.
+ *
+ * Due to lack of specification to define resources consumed by host
+ * bridge itself, all IO port resources defined by acpi_resource_io
+ * and acpi_resource_fixed_io are ignored to filter out IO
+ * port[0xCF8-0xCFF]. Seems this solution works with all BIOSes, though
+ * it's not perfect.
+ *
+ * Another possible solution is to explicitly filter out IO
+ * port[0xCF8-0xCFF].
+ */
+ res_flags = IORESOURCE_IO | IORESOURCE_MEM | IORESOURCE_IO_FIXED;
ret = acpi_dev_get_resources(device, list,
acpi_dev_filter_resource_type_cb,
- (void *)(IORESOURCE_IO | IORESOURCE_MEM));
+ (void *)res_flags);
if (ret < 0)
dev_warn(&device->dev,
"failed to parse _CRS method, error code %d\n", ret);
@@ -346,8 +366,7 @@ static void probe_pci_root_info(struct pci_root_info *info,
"no IO and memory resources present in _CRS\n");
else
resource_list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, tmp, list) {
- if ((entry->res->flags & IORESOURCE_WINDOW) == 0 ||
- (entry->res->flags & IORESOURCE_DISABLED))
+ if (entry->res->flags & IORESOURCE_DISABLED)
resource_list_destroy_entry(entry);
else
entry->res->name = info->name;
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/resource.c b/drivers/acpi/resource.c
index 5589a6e2a023..79b6d3b5ffd2 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/resource.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/resource.c
@@ -575,6 +575,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_dev_get_resources);
*
* This is a hepler function to support acpi_dev_get_resources(), which filters
* ACPI resource objects according to resource types.
+ *
+ * Flag IORESOURCE_IO_FIXED is used to opt out io and fixed_io resource
+ * descriptors for ACPI host bridges on x86 and IA64 platforms.
*/
int acpi_dev_filter_resource_type(struct acpi_resource *ares,
unsigned long types)
@@ -589,7 +592,8 @@ int acpi_dev_filter_resource_type(struct acpi_resource *ares,
break;
case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_IO:
case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_FIXED_IO:
- type = IORESOURCE_IO;
+ if ((types & IORESOURCE_IO_FIXED) == 0)
+ type = IORESOURCE_IO;
break;
case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_IRQ:
case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_EXTENDED_IRQ:
--
1.7.10.4
next reply other threads:[~2015-04-20 3:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-20 3:08 Jiang Liu [this message]
2015-04-29 0:40 ` [Bugfix v5] x86/PCI/ACPI: Fix regression caused by commit 63f1789ec716 Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-04-29 13:20 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-04-29 13:33 ` Jiang Liu
2015-04-29 13:37 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-04-30 4:41 ` [Bugfix v6] " Jiang Liu
2015-04-30 13:28 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-04-30 20:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-04-29 14:15 ` [Bugfix v5] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-04-29 13:53 ` Jiang Liu
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-04-13 4:31 [Bugfix v3] " Jiang Liu
2015-04-13 6:38 ` [Bugfix v5] " Jiang Liu
2015-04-13 6:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-04-13 12:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1429499338-16967-1-git-send-email-jiang.liu@linux.intel.com \
--to=jiang.liu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lv.zheng@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).