From: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"hanjun.guo@linaro.org" <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi: fix generic acpi_register_gsi() handling of shared interrupts
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 13:29:34 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1430242174.24034.32.camel@deneb.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <553FBE9C.5070408@arm.com>
On Tue, 2015-04-28 at 18:08 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 28/04/15 17:51, Mark Salter wrote:
> > If there are devices sharing an interrupt, acpi_register_gsi() could
> > be called multiple times for the same gsi. Currently, it just maps
> > the gsi without checking for a previous mapping. This patch adds a
> > check for an existing mapping and uses that if found.
> >
> > Cc: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
> > Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> > Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
> > Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/acpi/gsi.c | 7 +++++++
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/gsi.c b/drivers/acpi/gsi.c
> > index 38208f2..5698c4f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/gsi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/gsi.c
> > @@ -76,6 +76,13 @@ int acpi_register_gsi(struct device *dev, u32 gsi, int trigger,
> > unsigned int irq_type = acpi_gsi_get_irq_type(trigger, polarity);
> >
> > /*
> > + * The gsi may be shared with other devices, so check for a
> > + * previous mapping and use that if found.
> > + */
> > + if (acpi_gsi_to_irq(gsi, &irq) > 0)
> > + return irq;
>
> I'm afraid that's completely racy, and doesn't prevent much (two CPUs
> can execute this at the same time and still end up executing the rest of
> the code).
>
> Furthermore, irq_create_mapping is *designed* to handle that situation,
You're right. irq_create_mapping does that check already. But if it
is truly racy, irq_create_mapping has the same problem.
> and returns the same virtual IRQ for a given hwirq (and it has the
> proper locking...).
>
> So maybe it would be worth explaining the actual problem you're seeing,
> because the code as it stands should handle the problem you seem to
> describe.
Sorry for the noise. I was experimenting with some other code
in acpi_register_gsi which called __irq_domain_alloc_irqs
directly which bypassed the check in irq_create_mapping. And
that turns out to be a silly thing to do anyway, so nevermind.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-28 17:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-28 16:51 [PATCH] acpi: fix generic acpi_register_gsi() handling of shared interrupts Mark Salter
2015-04-28 17:08 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-04-28 17:29 ` Mark Salter [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1430242174.24034.32.camel@deneb.redhat.com \
--to=msalter@redhat.com \
--cc=Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=Will.Deacon@arm.com \
--cc=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).