From: Lukasz Anaczkowski <lukasz.anaczkowski@intel.com>
To: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
x86@kernel.org, jason@lakedaemon.net
Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net, len.brown@intel.com, pavel@ucw.cz,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, acpi: Handle xapic/x2apic entries in MADT
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 19:43:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1438278219-26487-1-git-send-email-lukasz.anaczkowski@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1507211017590.18576 () nanos>
> Please add proper explanations why the array parser is required and
> why the parse order needs to be reverse.
Thanks for comments.
I'm sending patch with reworked commit message. I hope that at least
some of the doubts are cleaner now.
Cheers,
Lukasz
next parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-30 17:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <alpine.DEB.2.11.1507211017590.18576 () nanos>
2015-07-30 17:43 ` Lukasz Anaczkowski [this message]
2015-07-30 17:43 ` [PATCH] x86, acpi: Handle lapic/x2apic entries in MADT Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-08-02 9:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-08-02 12:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-08-03 18:26 ` Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-08-03 18:26 ` Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-08-26 7:04 ` Anaczkowski, Lukasz
2015-08-26 10:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-08-26 11:42 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-08-26 12:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-08-26 17:49 ` Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-08-26 17:49 ` [PATCH] x86, arm64, " Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-08-27 9:37 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-09-08 11:07 ` Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-08 11:07 ` [PATCH 0/4] Fix how CPUs are enumerated when there's more than 255 CPUs Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-08 11:07 ` [PATCH 1/4] acpi: rename acpi_table_parse_entries Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-08 11:07 ` [PATCH 2/4] x86, arm64, acpi: Added acpi_subtable_proc Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-08 11:07 ` [PATCH 3/4] acpi: multi proc support Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-08 11:08 ` [PATCH 4/4] x86, acpi: Handle apic/x2apic entries in MADT in correct order Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-08 15:22 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-09-08 16:27 ` [PATCH 0/4] Fix how CPUs are enumerated when there's more than 255 CPUs Marc Zyngier
2015-09-08 22:45 ` Al Stone
2015-09-09 7:01 ` Anaczkowski, Lukasz
2015-09-09 9:30 ` [PATCH 0/2] " Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-09 9:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] acpi: Added acpi_subtable_proc to ACPI table parsers Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-09 9:30 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86, acpi: Handle apic/x2apic entries in MADT in correct order Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-09 13:56 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-09-09 14:27 ` Anaczkowski, Lukasz
2015-09-09 15:43 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-09-09 10:47 ` [PATCH 1/2] acpi: Added acpi_subtable_proc to ACPI table parsers Marc Zyngier
2015-09-09 13:47 ` Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-09 13:47 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] Fix how CPUs are enumerated when there's more than 255 CPUs Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-09 13:47 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] acpi: Added acpi_subtable_proc to ACPI table parsers Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-09 13:47 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] x86, acpi: Handle apic/x2apic entries in MADT in correct order Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-09-09 20:45 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] Fix how CPUs are enumerated when there's more than 255 CPUs Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-09-18 22:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-08-28 8:30 ` [PATCH] x86, arm64, acpi: Handle lapic/x2apic entries in MADT Ingo Molnar
2015-09-01 8:02 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2015-09-01 12:07 ` Anaczkowski, Lukasz
2015-09-01 13:36 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2015-09-07 14:04 ` Anaczkowski, Lukasz
2015-09-08 14:44 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2015-08-26 11:03 ` [PATCH] x86, " Marc Zyngier
2015-08-26 12:56 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2015-07-13 13:54 [PATCH] x86, acpi: Handle xapic/x2apic " Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-07-13 15:22 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-07-14 8:06 ` Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-07-14 8:06 ` Lukasz Anaczkowski
2015-07-14 8:26 ` Jiang Liu
2015-07-14 11:17 ` Anaczkowski, Lukasz
2015-07-21 8:27 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-07-14 14:24 ` Hanjun Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1438278219-26487-1-git-send-email-lukasz.anaczkowski@intel.com \
--to=lukasz.anaczkowski@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).