From: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com>
To: "Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@intel.com>,
"rjw@rjwysocki.net" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: "Zheng, Lv" <lv.zheng@intel.com>,
"elliott@hpe.com" <elliott@hpe.com>,
"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"devel@acpica.org" <devel@acpica.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ACPI/NFIT: Update Control Region Structure to comply ACPI 6.1
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 10:36:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1456853819.15454.45.camel@hpe.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <94F2FBAB4432B54E8AACC7DFDE6C92E37E44D6E1@ORSMSX110.amr.corp.intel.com>
On Tue, 2016-03-01 at 16:03 +0000, Moore, Robert wrote:
> We have a bunch of macros in include/acmacros.h -- like this:
>
> ACPI_MOVE_16_TO_16(d, s)
There is a problem in using the ACPICA byte-swap macros. ACPI is little-
endian arch, so the macros are set to perform byte-swappings when the CPU
arch is big-endian. This case, however, is the other way around. The
fields in question are defined & stored as arrays of bytes. If you treat
them as multi-bytes numeric values, then you need to byte-swap them when
the CPU arch is little-endian because arrays of bytes have the same
addressing as big-endian.
Another issue is that it is not clear who needs to perform the byte-
swapping among ACPICA and drivers. If ACPICA, drivers must agree that
these fields are always treated as multi-bytes numeric values despite of
the spec. If drivers, we need to make sure that only a single driver
performs this byte-swapping one time as ACPI tables are global structures.
I think it is much clearer to define the structure according to the ACPI
spec.
Thanks,
-Toshi
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Toshi Kani [mailto:toshi.kani@hpe.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 8:38 AM
> > To: Moore, Robert; rjw@rjwysocki.net; Williams, Dan J
> > Cc: Zheng, Lv; elliott@hpe.com; linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org; linux-
> > acpi@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; devel@acpica.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ACPI/NFIT: Update Control Region Structure
> > to
> > comply ACPI 6.1
> >
> > On Tue, 2016-03-01 at 15:13 +0000, Moore, Robert wrote:
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Toshi Kani [mailto:toshi.kani@hpe.com]
> > > > Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 1:55 PM
> > > > To: rjw@rjwysocki.net; Williams, Dan J
> > > > Cc: Moore, Robert; Zheng, Lv; elliott@hpe.com;
> > > > linux-nvdimm@lists.01.or g; linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org;
> > > > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; devel@acpica.org; Toshi Kani
> > > > Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] ACPI/NFIT: Update Control Region Structure
> > > > to comply ACPI 6.1
> > > >
> > > > ACPI 6.1, Table 5-133, updates NVDIMM Control Region Structure as
> > > > follows.
> > > > - Valid Fields, Manufacturing Location, and Manufacturing Date
> > > > are added from reserved range. No change in the structure size.
> > > > - IDs defined as SPD values are arrays of bytes. The spec
> > > > clarified that they need to be represented as arrays of bytes
> > > > as well.
> > > >
> > > > This patch makes the following changes to support this update.
> > > > - Change 'struct acpi_nfit_control_region' to reflect the update.
> > > > SPD IDs are defined as arrays of bytes, so that they can be
> > > > treated in the same way regardless of CPU endianness and are
> > > > not miss-treated as little-endian numeric values.
> > >
> > >
> > > I don't think we are going to start changing the ACPI tables defined
> > > in the ACPICA headers because of this. We do in fact have macros for
> > > this purpose.
> >
> > Can you elaborate what macros you suggest to use for this purpose?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Toshi
> N�����r��y���b�X��ǧv�^�){.n�+����{�i�b�{ay�\x1dʇڙ�,j\a��f���h���z�\x1e�w���
> \f���j:+v���w�j�m����\a����zZ+�����ݢj"��!�i
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-01 17:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-22 21:55 [PATCH v2 0/3] ACPI 6.1 update for NFIT Control Region Structure Toshi Kani
2016-02-22 21:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] ACPI/NFIT: Update Control Region Structure to comply ACPI 6.1 Toshi Kani
2016-03-01 15:13 ` Moore, Robert
2016-03-01 16:38 ` Toshi Kani
2016-03-01 16:03 ` Moore, Robert
2016-03-01 17:36 ` Toshi Kani [this message]
2016-03-01 17:37 ` Moore, Robert
2016-03-01 17:41 ` Moore, Robert
2016-03-01 19:10 ` Toshi Kani
2016-03-01 18:14 ` Dan Williams
2016-03-01 19:18 ` Toshi Kani
2016-03-01 19:53 ` Toshi Kani
2016-02-22 21:55 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] ACPI/NFIT: Add NVDIMM ID "id" under sysfs Toshi Kani
2016-02-22 21:55 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] nfit_test: Update SPD ID init handlings Toshi Kani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1456853819.15454.45.camel@hpe.com \
--to=toshi.kani@hpe.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=devel@acpica.org \
--cc=elliott@hpe.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=lv.zheng@intel.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).