* [PATCH][v5] ACPI / PM: Introduce efi poweroff for HW-full platforms without _S5
@ 2016-03-20 14:31 Chen Yu
[not found] ` <1458484268-18311-1-git-send-email-yu.c.chen-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Chen Yu @ 2016-03-20 14:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-acpi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Matt Fleming
Cc: linux-pm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A,
Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, Len Brown, Chen Yu
The problem is Linux registers pm_power_off = efi_power_off
only if we are in hardware reduced mode. Actually, what we also
want is to do this when ACPI S5 is simply not supported on
non-legacy platforms. Since there will be HW-full mode where
the DSDT fails to supply an _S5 object(without SLP_TYP), we
should let such kind of platform to leverage efi runtime service
to poweroff.
This patch uses efi power off as first choice when S5 is
unavailable, even if there is a customized poweroff(driver provided, eg).
Meanwhile, the legacy platforms will not be affected because there is no
path for them to overwrite the pm_power_off to efi power off.
Suggested-by: Len Brown <len.brown-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
---
v5:
- Revert to version 2, enforce EFI poweroff for such kind
of platforms.
v4:
- Since in v3 efi_poweroff_required() is not guaranteed to run
after all of the other code that may register alternative
power off handling, add the pm_power_off_default that would
be used by pm_power_off if nothing else is available.
v3:
- Only assign pm_power_off to efi_power_off when there are no
other pm_power_off registered at that time, in case other
commponents would like to customize their own implementation.
---
v2:
- Convert the acpi_no_s5 to a global bool variable in sleep.c and
add a declaration to include/linux/acpi.h.
---
arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c | 2 +-
drivers/acpi/sleep.c | 7 +++++++
include/linux/acpi.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
index ed30e79..7e5ec62 100644
--- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
+++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
@@ -340,5 +340,5 @@ bool efi_reboot_required(void)
bool efi_poweroff_required(void)
{
- return !!acpi_gbl_reduced_hardware;
+ return acpi_gbl_reduced_hardware || acpi_no_s5;
}
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
index 9cb9752..a33859c 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
@@ -25,6 +25,11 @@
#include "internal.h"
#include "sleep.h"
+/*
+ * Some HW-full platforms do not have _S5, so they may need
+ * to leverage efi power off for a shutdown.
+ */
+bool acpi_no_s5;
static u8 sleep_states[ACPI_S_STATE_COUNT];
static void acpi_sleep_tts_switch(u32 acpi_state)
@@ -846,6 +851,8 @@ int __init acpi_sleep_init(void)
sleep_states[ACPI_STATE_S5] = 1;
pm_power_off_prepare = acpi_power_off_prepare;
pm_power_off = acpi_power_off;
+ } else {
+ acpi_no_s5 = true;
}
supported[0] = 0;
diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
index 06ed7e5..4d2e67f 100644
--- a/include/linux/acpi.h
+++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
@@ -278,6 +278,7 @@ void acpi_irq_stats_init(void);
extern u32 acpi_irq_handled;
extern u32 acpi_irq_not_handled;
extern unsigned int acpi_sci_irq;
+extern bool acpi_no_s5;
#define INVALID_ACPI_IRQ ((unsigned)-1)
static inline bool acpi_sci_irq_valid(void)
{
--
1.8.4.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread[parent not found: <1458484268-18311-1-git-send-email-yu.c.chen-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [PATCH][v5] ACPI / PM: Introduce efi poweroff for HW-full platforms without _S5 [not found] ` <1458484268-18311-1-git-send-email-yu.c.chen-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> @ 2016-03-21 12:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [not found] ` <CAJZ5v0j1TpjQ8nD3gr7NYA_dpcghDidsvSoAOuobLMw6-3waCg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2016-03-21 12:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chen Yu, Matt Fleming Cc: ACPI Devel Maling List, Rafael J. Wysocki, linux-pm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, Linux Kernel Mailing List, x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, Len Brown On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Chen Yu <yu.c.chen-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > The problem is Linux registers pm_power_off = efi_power_off > only if we are in hardware reduced mode. Actually, what we also > want is to do this when ACPI S5 is simply not supported on > non-legacy platforms. Since there will be HW-full mode where > the DSDT fails to supply an _S5 object(without SLP_TYP), we > should let such kind of platform to leverage efi runtime service > to poweroff. > > This patch uses efi power off as first choice when S5 is > unavailable, even if there is a customized poweroff(driver provided, eg). > Meanwhile, the legacy platforms will not be affected because there is no > path for them to overwrite the pm_power_off to efi power off. > > Suggested-by: Len Brown <len.brown-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > --- > v5: > - Revert to version 2, enforce EFI poweroff for such kind > of platforms. > v4: > - Since in v3 efi_poweroff_required() is not guaranteed to run > after all of the other code that may register alternative > power off handling, add the pm_power_off_default that would > be used by pm_power_off if nothing else is available. > v3: > - Only assign pm_power_off to efi_power_off when there are no > other pm_power_off registered at that time, in case other > commponents would like to customize their own implementation. > --- > v2: > - Convert the acpi_no_s5 to a global bool variable in sleep.c and > add a declaration to include/linux/acpi.h. > --- > arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c | 2 +- > drivers/acpi/sleep.c | 7 +++++++ > include/linux/acpi.h | 1 + > 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c > index ed30e79..7e5ec62 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c > +++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c > @@ -340,5 +340,5 @@ bool efi_reboot_required(void) > > bool efi_poweroff_required(void) > { > - return !!acpi_gbl_reduced_hardware; > + return acpi_gbl_reduced_hardware || acpi_no_s5; > } > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c > index 9cb9752..a33859c 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c > @@ -25,6 +25,11 @@ > #include "internal.h" > #include "sleep.h" > > +/* > + * Some HW-full platforms do not have _S5, so they may need > + * to leverage efi power off for a shutdown. > + */ > +bool acpi_no_s5; > static u8 sleep_states[ACPI_S_STATE_COUNT]; > > static void acpi_sleep_tts_switch(u32 acpi_state) > @@ -846,6 +851,8 @@ int __init acpi_sleep_init(void) > sleep_states[ACPI_STATE_S5] = 1; > pm_power_off_prepare = acpi_power_off_prepare; > pm_power_off = acpi_power_off; > + } else { > + acpi_no_s5 = true; > } > > supported[0] = 0; > diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h > index 06ed7e5..4d2e67f 100644 > --- a/include/linux/acpi.h > +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h > @@ -278,6 +278,7 @@ void acpi_irq_stats_init(void); > extern u32 acpi_irq_handled; > extern u32 acpi_irq_not_handled; > extern unsigned int acpi_sci_irq; > +extern bool acpi_no_s5; > #define INVALID_ACPI_IRQ ((unsigned)-1) > static inline bool acpi_sci_irq_valid(void) > { > -- OK, this is fine by me. Matt, what do you think? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <CAJZ5v0j1TpjQ8nD3gr7NYA_dpcghDidsvSoAOuobLMw6-3waCg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [PATCH][v5] ACPI / PM: Introduce efi poweroff for HW-full platforms without _S5 [not found] ` <CAJZ5v0j1TpjQ8nD3gr7NYA_dpcghDidsvSoAOuobLMw6-3waCg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> @ 2016-03-21 14:05 ` Matt Fleming 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Matt Fleming @ 2016-03-21 14:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Chen Yu, ACPI Devel Maling List, linux-pm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, Linux Kernel Mailing List, x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, Len Brown On Mon, 21 Mar, at 01:43:18PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > OK, this is fine by me. > > Matt, what do you think? If possible I'd like to see some mention in the commit message of future Intel Base-IA platforms requiring this support, so when someone asks me in the future (and I've forgotten the answer) "Why was this patch get merged?" I can point to the commit log. But other than that, yeah, this looks good to me. Thanks! Reviewed-by: Matt Fleming <matt-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-03-21 14:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-03-20 14:31 [PATCH][v5] ACPI / PM: Introduce efi poweroff for HW-full platforms without _S5 Chen Yu
[not found] ` <1458484268-18311-1-git-send-email-yu.c.chen-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2016-03-21 12:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
[not found] ` <CAJZ5v0j1TpjQ8nD3gr7NYA_dpcghDidsvSoAOuobLMw6-3waCg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2016-03-21 14:05 ` Matt Fleming
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).