From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI / scan: Treat power resources in a special way Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 22:02:59 +0100 Message-ID: <1458998.lg5S0BfPCV@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <1565436.cOJ1sW4X70@vostro.rjw.lan> <1357579019.2153.2.camel@misato.fc.hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from hydra.sisk.pl ([212.160.235.94]:34336 "EHLO hydra.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755658Ab3AGU5R (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jan 2013 15:57:17 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1357579019.2153.2.camel@misato.fc.hp.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Toshi Kani Cc: ACPI Devel Maling List , LKML , Bjorn Helgaas , Yinghai Lu , Jiang Liu On Monday, January 07, 2013 10:16:59 AM Toshi Kani wrote: > On Mon, 2012-12-31 at 00:46 +0000, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > > > Commit 1d57433 (ACPI: Separate adding ACPI device objects from > > probing ACPI drivers) introduced an ACPI power resources management > > I am seeing a different commit id for this. > > commit 805d410fb0dbd65e1a57a810858fa2491e75822d > Author: Rafael J. Wysocki > Date: Fri Dec 21 00:36:39 2012 +0100 > > ACPI: Separate adding ACPI device objects from probing ACPI drivers > My bad, sorry. I rebased the branch without modifying the changelog of this patch. It should be fixed now, but please note that the acpi-scan branch has changed. > > regression, because it didn't ensure that the power resources > > driver bind to the struct acpi_device objects corresponding > > to power resources as soon as they were created. As a result, > > ACPI power management routines may attempt to access power resource > > objects before they are ready to use. > > > > To fix this problem, tell the acpi_add_single_object() in > > acpi_bus_check_add() to probe the driver for objects of type > > ACPI_BUS_TYPE_POWER. This fix has been verified to work on > > HP nx6325 where the problem was first observed. > > > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki > > The change looks good. > > Acked-by: Toshi Kani Thanks a lot, Rafael > > --- > > > > The commit mentioned in the changelog is in linux-next only for now, but > > it's likely to go upstream in this form anyway and the fix on top of the > > whole ACPI scan series is trivial. > > > > Thanks, > > Rafael > > > > --- > > drivers/acpi/scan.c | 3 ++- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > Index: linux/drivers/acpi/scan.c > > =================================================================== > > --- linux.orig/drivers/acpi/scan.c > > +++ linux/drivers/acpi/scan.c > > @@ -1606,7 +1606,8 @@ static acpi_status acpi_bus_check_add(ac > > return AE_CTRL_DEPTH; > > } > > > > - acpi_add_single_object(&device, handle, type, sta, false); > > + acpi_add_single_object(&device, handle, type, sta, > > + type == ACPI_BUS_TYPE_POWER); > > if (!device) > > return AE_CTRL_DEPTH; > > > > > > -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.