public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
	"Alexander E . Patrakov" <patrakov@gmail.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>, Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUGFIX 5/9] ACPI, DOCK: kill redundant spin lock in dock device object
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 20:28:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1490442.eFer0nddaj@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1371141152-9468-6-git-send-email-jiang.liu@huawei.com>

On Friday, June 14, 2013 12:32:28 AM Jiang Liu wrote:
> All dock device related data structures are created during driver
> initialization, so kill the redundant spin lock in dock device object.

As a cleanup, it definitely makes sense, but does it fix anything?

Rafael


> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
> Cc: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
> Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/dock.c | 15 +++------------
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/dock.c b/drivers/acpi/dock.c
> index 8e578aa..cd2d5df 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/dock.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/dock.c
> @@ -57,7 +57,6 @@ struct dock_station {
>  	acpi_handle handle;
>  	unsigned long last_dock_time;
>  	u32 flags;
> -	spinlock_t dd_lock;
>  	struct mutex hp_lock;
>  	struct task_struct *owner;
>  	struct list_head dependent_devices;
> @@ -107,10 +106,7 @@ add_dock_dependent_device(struct dock_station *ds, acpi_handle handle)
>  	dd->handle = handle;
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dd->list);
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dd->hotplug_list);
> -
> -	spin_lock(&ds->dd_lock);
>  	list_add_tail(&dd->list, &ds->dependent_devices);
> -	spin_unlock(&ds->dd_lock);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -168,14 +164,10 @@ find_dock_dependent_device(struct dock_station *ds, acpi_handle handle)
>  {
>  	struct dock_dependent_device *dd;
>  
> -	spin_lock(&ds->dd_lock);
> -	list_for_each_entry(dd, &ds->dependent_devices, list) {
> -		if (handle == dd->handle) {
> -			spin_unlock(&ds->dd_lock);
> +	list_for_each_entry(dd, &ds->dependent_devices, list)
> +		if (handle == dd->handle)
>  			return dd;
> -		}
> -	}
> -	spin_unlock(&ds->dd_lock);
> +
>  	return NULL;
>  }
>  
> @@ -964,7 +956,6 @@ static int __init dock_add(acpi_handle handle)
>  	dock_station->last_dock_time = jiffies - HZ;
>  
>  	mutex_init(&dock_station->hp_lock);
> -	spin_lock_init(&dock_station->dd_lock);
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dock_station->sibling);
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dock_station->hotplug_devices);
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dock_station->dependent_devices);
> 
-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-13 18:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1371141152-9468-1-git-send-email-jiang.liu@huawei.com>
2013-06-13 16:32 ` [BUGFIX 1/9] ACPI, DOCK: initialize dock subsystem before scanning PCI root buses Jiang Liu
2013-06-13 18:22   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-13 18:24   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-13 16:32 ` [BUGFIX 3/9] ACPI, DOCK: clean up unused module related code Jiang Liu
2013-06-13 18:26   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-13 18:39     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-14 14:04     ` Jiang Liu
2013-06-14 14:16       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-13 16:32 ` [BUGFIX 4/9] ACPI, DOCK: avoid initializing acpi_dock_notifier_list multiple times Jiang Liu
2013-06-13 18:27   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-13 16:32 ` [BUGFIX 5/9] ACPI, DOCK: kill redundant spin lock in dock device object Jiang Liu
2013-06-13 18:28   ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2013-06-14 14:05     ` Jiang Liu
2013-06-14 14:16       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-13 16:32 ` [BUGFIX 6/9] ACPI, DOCK: mark initialization functions with __init Jiang Liu
2013-06-13 18:29   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-13 16:32 ` [BUGFIX 7/9] ACPI, DOCK: simplify implementation of dock_create_acpi_device() Jiang Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1490442.eFer0nddaj@vostro.rjw.lan \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jiang.liu@huawei.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liuj97@gmail.com \
    --cc=patrakov@gmail.com \
    --cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
    --cc=wangyijing@huawei.com \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox