From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
linux-acpi <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: lpss_iosf_enter_d3_state breaks PWM on Baytrail
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 17:31:22 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1498573882.22624.198.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6f19cff9-f367-248e-0c5e-9e6ce9587281@redhat.com>
On Tue, 2017-06-27 at 16:15 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 06/27/2017 03:41 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > +Cc: Jarkko and Ulf (they are discussing patch series regarding to
> > I2C
> > and ACPI LPSS as well)
>
> Hmm, do you have a link to this patch series?
https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-i2c/msg29078.html
In the thread Ulf mentioned his WIP branch.
>
> > +Cc: Mika, he might have a sight on this as well.
>
> I've added everyone in me reply to your first reply, but Jarkko's
> email address seems to not work.
Oops, wrong Jarkko. Now is proper one. (That's why entire message is
kept here)
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
>
> >
> > On Tue, 2017-06-27 at 16:29 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2017-06-26 at 11:31 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > > > Hi Andy, et al.,
> > > >
> > > > I've spend quite some time this weekend debugging an issue
> > > > an a Bay Trail laptop with a Crystal Cove PMIC which uses
> > > > the LPSS PWM for backlight control rather then the PMIC's
> > > > PWM.
> > > >
> > > > The problem is lpss_iosf_enter_d3_state. Specifically when
> > > > called when the PWM runtime-suspends during i915 driver load,
> > > > during which the i915 driver disables then re-enables the PWM.
> > > >
> > > > This is the only time (including normal suspend(to-idle)
> > > > and resume) when this check:
> > > >
> > > > pmc_status = (~(d3_sts_0 | func_dis)) & pmc_mask;
> > > > if (pmc_status)
> > > > goto exit;
> > > >
> > > > Does not hit the goto exit path
> > >
> > > ...meaning all LPSS devices (except maybe DMA) are in D3hot.
> > >
> > > > and lpss_iosf_enter_d3_state
> > > > actually executes these 3 statements:
> > > >
> > > > iosf_mbi_modify(LPSS_IOSF_UNIT_LPIO1, MBI_CFG_WRITE,
> > > > LPSS_IOSF_PMCSR, value2, mask2);
> > > >
> > > > iosf_mbi_modify(LPSS_IOSF_UNIT_LPIO2, MBI_CFG_WRITE,
> > > > LPSS_IOSF_PMCSR, value2, mask2);
> > > >
> > > > iosf_mbi_modify(LPSS_IOSF_UNIT_LPIOEP, MBI_CR_WRITE,
> > > > LPSS_IOSF_GPIODEF0, value1, mask1);
> > > >
> > > > If I comment out these 3 statements then everything works fine,
> > > > with these 3 statements in place though, then the PWM controller
> > > > gets stuck when the i915 driver tries to re-enable it (and it
> > > > runtime-resumes). After these 3 statements have been run once
> > > > then any subsequent reads from the PWM's control register
> > > > always return 0x00010000 and writes seem to be ignored.
> > >
> > > Sounds like powered off LPSS power island.
> > >
> > > > Given the past troubles with the LPSS DMA controller suspend,
> > > > see all the links in this commit message (which introduces
> > > > the current fix) :
> > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.g
> > > > it/c
> > > > om
> > > > mit/?id=eebb3e8d8aaf2
> > > >
> > > > I'm tempted to just rip out lpss_iosf_enter_d3_state,
> > > > especially since it does not seem to do anything other
> > > > then during early boot when not all drivers are loaded yet.
> > >
> > > Interesting...
> > >
> > > You are telling that there is guaranteed that at least one LPSS
> > > device
> > > (except DMA) will be on at any time?
> > >
> > > > Note that on Bay Trail devices with an AXP288 PMIC (most new
> > > > Bay Trail devices) and on any Cherry Trail device the LPSS I2C
> > > > controller connected to the PMIC will never suspend because
> > > > some DSTDs make ACPI OpRegion calls during late suspend /
> > > > early resume and as such we need to keep the I2C bus alive
> > > > the whole time. This means that the check in
> > > > lpss_iosf_enter_d3_state will always hit the goto exit path
> > > > on these devices,
> > >
> > > Looks like an answer to the previous question.
> > >
> > > > leaving just (older) Bay Trail + non AXP288
> > > > PMIC devices as potentially hitting the code path where
> > > > lpss_iosf_enter_d3_state actually does something and these are
> > > > exactly the devices with which people are having a lot of
> > > > problems with freezes / hangs.
> > > >
> > > > So I believe that the best approach would be to simply remove
> > > > lpss_iosf_enter_d3_state. Which leaves me wondering what it
> > > > actually does. It would be nice for the future if undocumented
> > > > (not publicly documented) registers are used that some comments
> > > > are added describing what each register write actually does.
> > >
> > > Do the commit messages describe this enough along with several
> > > comments
> > > inside acpi_lpss.c?
> > >
> > > > These seem to simply put the DMA controller into D3:
> > > >
> > > > u32 value2 = LPSS_PMCSR_D3hot;
> > > > u32 mask2 = LPSS_PMCSR_Dx_MASK;
> > > >
> > > > iosf_mbi_modify(LPSS_IOSF_UNIT_LPIO1, MBI_CFG_WRITE,
> > > > LPSS_IOSF_PMCSR, value2, mask2);
> > > >
> > > > iosf_mbi_modify(LPSS_IOSF_UNIT_LPIO2, MBI_CFG_WRITE,
> > > > LPSS_IOSF_PMCSR, value2, mask2);
> > >
> > > It overrides the lines which propagate clock and reset signals to
> > > the
> > > entire LPSS islands.
> > >
> > > DMA just happened to be a function 0 (in terms of PCI), so, if it
> > > is
> > > off
> > > the rest of the functions can not be on.
> > >
> > > > But what does this one do? :
> > > >
> > > > u32 value1 = 0;
> > > > u32 mask1 = LPSS_GPIODEF0_DMA_D3_MASK |
> > > > LPSS_GPIODEF0_DMA_LLP;
> > >
> > > (this one is a chicken bit to enable hardware linked list
> > > transfers on
> > > DMA)
> > >
> > > >
> > > > iosf_mbi_modify(LPSS_IOSF_UNIT_LPIOEP, MBI_CR_WRITE,
> > > > LPSS_IOSF_GPIODEF0, value1, mask1);
> > > >
> > > > I guess this turns on(?) the automatically down powering of the
> > > > DMA controllers ? If so then why not just do only that ?
> > >
> > > No, automatic power gating is a *hardware* (PMC firmware? I do not
> > > remember details now) feature which is overridden by the code
> > > above.
> > >
> > > It's something like logical gates where one of the input is what
> > > we
> > > supply through these chicken bits.
> > >
> > > > And if this turns it on
> > > > then lpss_iosf_exit_d3_state turns the
> > > > automagic off, if that is true,
> > >
> > > The proper wording here I suppose *it allows or forbids the
> > > automatic
> > > power gating*. It's one layer up I would say. It means it might be
> > > a
> > > latency between writing these bits and actual hardware response on
> > > them.
> > >
> > > > then there is an ordering issue.
> > > > lpss_iosf_exit_d3_state gets only run on (runtime)resume, not
> > > > on the initial probe of LPSS devices, so that would mean that
> > > > between
> > > > the initial probe and the first resume we have the undesirable
> > > > auto-off feature active ?
> > >
> > > Looks like ACPI PM for LPSS should take care of this at probe.
> > > When I
> > > wrote the code I was assuming that ACPI enumerated devices are
> > > runtime
> > > powered on during ->probe(). For such I did explicit calls in DMA
> > > driver: bb32baf76e56 ("dmaengine: dw: enable runtime PM").
> > >
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-27 14:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-26 9:31 lpss_iosf_enter_d3_state breaks PWM on Baytrail Hans de Goede
2017-06-27 13:29 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-06-27 13:41 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-06-27 14:15 ` Hans de Goede
2017-06-27 14:31 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2017-06-27 13:54 ` Hans de Goede
2017-07-06 19:14 ` Hans de Goede
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1498573882.22624.198.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).