From: "Kani, Toshimitsu" <toshi.kani@hpe.com>
To: "linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
"vishal.l.verma@intel.com" <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
Cc: "dan.j.williams@intel.com" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
"jmoyer@redhat.com" <jmoyer@redhat.com>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] BTT error clearing rework
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 15:28:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1501600767.2042.99.camel@hpe.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1501544000.4405.5.camel@intel.com>
On Mon, 2017-07-31 at 23:35 +0000, Verma, Vishal L wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-07-31 at 23:15 +0000, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-07-26 at 17:35 -0600, Vishal Verma wrote:
:
> >
> > Step 3 clears an error and runs fine with raw and memory
> > modes. With sector mode, however, it ends up with continuous write
> > errors like below and does not clear the error. Do you have any
> > thoughts?
> >
> > EXT4-fs warning (device pmem0s): ext4_end_bio:322: I/O error 10
> > writing to inode 17 (offset 1023410176 size 8388608 starting block
> > 1834752)
> > Buffer I/O error on device pmem0s, logical block 1834752
> > Buffer I/O error on device pmem0s, logical block 1834753
> > Buffer I/O error on device pmem0s, logical block 1834754
> > :
> > nd_pmem btt0.0: io error in WRITE sector 14680064, len 4096,
> > EXT4-fs warning (device pmem0s): ext4_end_bio:322: I/O error 10
> > writing to inode 17 (offset 1031798784 size 1052672 starting block
> > 1835008)
> > nd_pmem btt0.0: io error in WRITE sector 14682112, len 4096,
> > EXT4-fs warning (device pmem0s): ext4_end_bio:322: I/O error 10
> > writing to inode 17 (offset 1031798784 size 2101248 starting block
> > 1835264)
> > :
> > nd_pmem btt0.0: io error in WRITE sector 14698496, len 4096,
> > nd_pmem btt0.0: io error in WRITE sector 14700544, len 4096,
> > nd_pmem btt0.0: io error in WRITE sector 14702592, len 4096,
> > nd_pmem btt0.0: io error in WRITE sector 14704640, len 4096,
> > :
>
> Thanks for the test Toshi, I will try and reproduce it.
> My first guess is - are the injected errors potentially in the BTT
> metadata area towards the end?
>
> ->rw_bytes can only clear errors on properly aligned writes, and the
> btt metadata writes will be too small to clear metadata errors..
I picked an injected offset without careful thoughts, so it is possible
that I might have stepped into such area. I just tested with a block
device interface with multiple different offsets, and they failed in
clearing as well... I will look into further as well as my test setup.
Thanks,
-Toshi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-01 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-26 23:35 [PATCH v4 0/6] BTT error clearing rework Vishal Verma
2017-07-26 23:35 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] btt: fix a missed NVDIMM_IO_ATOMIC case in the write path Vishal Verma
2017-07-26 23:35 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] btt: refactor map entry operations with macros Vishal Verma
2017-07-26 23:35 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] btt: ensure that flags were also unchanged during a map_read Vishal Verma
[not found] ` <20170726233546.29052-1-vishal.l.verma-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2017-07-26 23:35 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] btt: cache sector_size in arena_info Vishal Verma
2017-07-26 23:35 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] libnvdimm: fix potential deadlock while clearing errors Vishal Verma
2017-07-26 23:35 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] libnvdimm, btt: rework error clearing Vishal Verma
2017-07-31 23:15 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] BTT error clearing rework Kani, Toshimitsu
2017-07-31 23:35 ` Verma, Vishal L
2017-08-01 15:28 ` Kani, Toshimitsu [this message]
2017-08-01 19:11 ` Kani, Toshimitsu
[not found] ` <1501614143.2042.101.camel-ZPxbGqLxI0U@public.gmane.org>
2017-08-01 19:56 ` Vishal Verma
2017-08-01 20:06 ` Kani, Toshimitsu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1501600767.2042.99.camel@hpe.com \
--to=toshi.kani@hpe.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox