From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/35] ACPI/acpi_pad: Remove the local apic nonsense
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 07:16:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1505923.WBzzAyg8Mf@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1621111.kx7SauspkE@vostro.rjw.lan>
On Monday, February 16, 2015 07:54:12 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, February 16, 2015 01:14:36 PM Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> >
> > While looking through the (ab)use of the clockevents_notify() function
> > I stumbled over the following gem in the acpi_pad code:
> >
> > if (lapic_detected_unstable && !lapic_marked_unstable) {
> > /* LAPIC could halt in idle, so notify users */
> > for_each_online_cpu(i)
> > clockevents_notify(CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_BROADCAST_ON, &i);
> > lapic_marked_unstable = 1;
> > }
> >
> > This code calls on the cpu which detects the lapic unstable condition
> > first clockevents_notify() to tell the core code that the broadcast
> > should be enabled on all online cpus. Brilliant stuff that as it
> > notifies the core code a num_online_cpus() times that the broadcast
> > should be enabled on the current cpu.
> >
> > This probably has never been noticed because that code got never
> > tested with NOHZ=n and HIGHRES_TIMER=n or it just worked by chance
> > because one of the other mechanisms told the core in the right way
> > that the local apic timer is wreckaged.
> >
> > Sigh, this is:
> >
> > - The 4th incarnation of idle drivers which has their own mechanism
> > to detect and deal with X86_FEATURE_ARAT.
> >
> > - The 2nd incarnation of fake idle mechanisms with a different set of
> > brainmelting bugs.
> >
> > - Has been merged against an explicit NAK of the scheduler
> > maintainer with the promise to improve it over time.
> >
> > - Another example of featuritis driven trainwreck engineering.
> >
> > - Another pointless waste of my time.
> >
> > Fix this nonsense by removing that lapic detection and notification
> > logic and simply call into the clockevents code unconditonally. The
> > ARAT feature is marked in the lapic clockevent already so the core
> > code will just ignore the requests and return.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
>
> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Or I can apply it right away if you want me to.
Rafael
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-18 6:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20150216121435.203983131@infradead.org>
2015-02-16 12:14 ` [PATCH 01/35] ACPI/acpi_pad: Remove the local apic nonsense Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-16 18:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-02-18 6:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1505923.WBzzAyg8Mf@vostro.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox