From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Shevchenko Subject: Re: [2/4] ACPI / battery: reorder headers alphabetically Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 13:55:19 +0200 Message-ID: <1515930919.7000.984.camel@linux.intel.com> References: <20180113115331.GA13662@thinkpad> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:56897 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751381AbeANLzW (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Jan 2018 06:55:22 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20180113115331.GA13662@thinkpad> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Ognjen =?UTF-8?Q?Gali=C4=87?= , Dmitry Rozhkov , rjw@rjwysocki.net, lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2018-01-13 at 12:53 +0100, Ognjen Galić wrote: > > -#include > > -#include > > -#include > > -#include > > #include > > -#include > > #include > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > #include > > #include > > -#include > > +#include > > These changes completely break my patch: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10142157/ > > Can we please postpone this patch until I hear back from Rafael > about my series, as my series does some of the things this patch > series does (like defining pr_fmt to shorten log prints) and this > is a much smaller changeset and would require small changes on > conflicts compared to my series? Definitely on both series we need to hear from Rafael. The usual approach, how I understand the process, the first pushed is first served, and a quite normal situation that the one, which had been send later, comes to repository first. But see above, we definitely rely on maintainer's decision here. P.S. AFAIU both series are rebased on top of linux-pm, correct? (At least I'm sure about this one) -- Andy Shevchenko Intel Finland Oy