From: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
To: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 17/25] ACPI: processor: Remove the duplicated ACPI_PROCESSOR_CLASS macro
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 15:38:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1600328345-27627-18-git-send-email-guohanjun@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1600328345-27627-1-git-send-email-guohanjun@huawei.com>
The ACPI_PROCESSOR_CLASS macro is defined in <acpi/processor.h>,
and ACPI processor drivers include <acpi/processor.h>, so we
can remove the duplicated ACPI_PROCESSOR_CLASS macro.
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
---
drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c | 1 -
drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c | 1 -
drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c | 2 --
drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c | 1 -
4 files changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
index 71a30b0d..ce24ba0 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
@@ -31,7 +31,6 @@
#include <asm/apic.h>
#endif
-#define ACPI_PROCESSOR_CLASS "processor"
#define _COMPONENT ACPI_PROCESSOR_COMPONENT
ACPI_MODULE_NAME("processor_idle");
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
index 5909e8f..06ca924 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
@@ -22,7 +22,6 @@
#define PREFIX "ACPI: "
-#define ACPI_PROCESSOR_CLASS "processor"
#define ACPI_PROCESSOR_FILE_PERFORMANCE "performance"
#define _COMPONENT ACPI_PROCESSOR_COMPONENT
ACPI_MODULE_NAME("processor_perflib");
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c
index 6c7d05b..677a132 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c
@@ -19,8 +19,6 @@
#define PREFIX "ACPI: "
-#define ACPI_PROCESSOR_CLASS "processor"
-
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ
/* If a passive cooling situation is detected, primarily CPUfreq is used, as it
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c
index a0bd56e..b187653 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c
@@ -22,7 +22,6 @@
#define PREFIX "ACPI: "
-#define ACPI_PROCESSOR_CLASS "processor"
#define _COMPONENT ACPI_PROCESSOR_COMPONENT
ACPI_MODULE_NAME("processor_throttling");
--
1.7.12.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-17 8:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-17 7:38 [PATCH 00/25] ACPI: First step to decouple ACPICA debug functionality from ACPI driver Hanjun Guo
2020-09-17 7:38 ` [PATCH 01/25] ACPI: cmos_rtc: Remove the ACPI_MODULE_NAME() Hanjun Guo
2020-09-17 7:38 ` [PATCH 02/25] ACPI: configfs: Decouple with ACPICA Hanjun Guo
2020-09-17 7:38 ` [PATCH 03/25] ACPI: configfs: Add the missing config_item_put() Hanjun Guo
2020-09-17 7:38 ` [PATCH 04/25] ACPI: debug: Remove the not used function Hanjun Guo
2020-09-17 7:38 ` [PATCH 05/25] ACPI: LPSS: Remove the ACPI_MODULE_NAME() Hanjun Guo
2020-09-17 7:38 ` [PATCH 06/25] ACPI: memhotplug: Remove the leftover ACPICA debug functionality Hanjun Guo
2020-09-17 7:38 ` [PATCH 07/25] ACPI: memhotplug: Remove the state for memory device Hanjun Guo
2020-09-17 7:38 ` [PATCH 08/25] ACPI: platform: Remove the leftover ACPICA debug functinality Hanjun Guo
2020-09-17 7:38 ` [PATCH 09/25] ACPI: container: Remove the leftover ACPICA debug functionality Hanjun Guo
2020-09-17 7:38 ` [PATCH 10/25] ACPI: custom_method: Remove the ACPICA debug code Hanjun Guo
2020-09-17 7:38 ` [PATCH 11/25] ACPI: debugfs: " Hanjun Guo
2020-09-17 7:38 ` [PATCH 12/25] ACPI: dock: " Hanjun Guo
2020-09-17 7:38 ` [PATCH 13/25] ACPI: event: " Hanjun Guo
2020-09-17 7:38 ` [PATCH 14/25] ACPI: PCI: Remove the unused " Hanjun Guo
2020-09-17 7:38 ` [PATCH 15/25] ACPI: proc: " Hanjun Guo
2020-09-17 7:38 ` [PATCH 16/25] ACPI: processor: Remove the dead " Hanjun Guo
2020-09-17 7:38 ` Hanjun Guo [this message]
2020-09-17 7:38 ` [PATCH 18/25] ACPI: SBS: Simplify the driver init code Hanjun Guo
2020-09-17 7:38 ` [PATCH 19/25] ACPI: SBS: Simplify the code using module_acpi_driver() Hanjun Guo
2020-09-17 7:39 ` [PATCH 20/25] ACPI: tiny-power-button: Remove the dead ACPICA debug code Hanjun Guo
2020-09-17 7:39 ` [PATCH 21/25] ACPI: tiny-power-button: Simplify the code using module_acpi_driver() Hanjun Guo
2020-09-17 7:39 ` [PATCH 22/25] ACPI: video: Remove the dead ACPICA debug code Hanjun Guo
2020-09-17 7:39 ` [PATCH 23/25] ACPI: wakeup: " Hanjun Guo
2020-09-17 7:39 ` [PATCH RFC 24/25] ACPI: sysfs: Remove the dead debug interfaces Hanjun Guo
2020-09-17 7:39 ` [PATCH RFC 25/25] ACPI: debug: Update the ACPI debug document Hanjun Guo
2020-09-17 15:08 ` [PATCH 00/25] ACPI: First step to decouple ACPICA debug functionality from ACPI driver Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-09-18 1:55 ` Hanjun Guo
2020-09-18 13:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-09-19 7:22 ` Hanjun Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1600328345-27627-18-git-send-email-guohanjun@huawei.com \
--to=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox