From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: "Justin P. Mattock" <justinmattock@gmail.com>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5]acpi:glue.c Fix warning: variable 'ret' set but not used
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 10:31:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <16513.1277976706@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C2B9F49.8090304@gmail.com>
Justin P. Mattock <justinmattock@gmail.com> wrote:
> + if (fn) {
> + dev_warn(&acpi_dev->dev,
> + "Failed to create firmware_node link to %s %s: %d\n",
> + dev_driver_string(dev), dev_name(dev), fn);
> + } else if (pn) {
> + dev_warn(&acpi_dev->dev,
> + "Failed to create physical_node link to %s %s: %d\n",
> + dev_driver_string(dev), dev_name(dev), pn);
> + return AE_ERROR;
> + }
There's one more question to ask yourself: do you really need two dev_warn()
statements? You could have just one that prints both error values:
if (fn || pn)
dev_warn(&acpi_dev->dev,
"Failed to create link(s) to %s %s:"
" fn=%d pn=%d\n",
dev_driver_string(dev), dev_name(dev),
fn, pn);
Not sure it's worth going that far. You could reduce it still further:
if (fn || pn)
dev_warn(&acpi_dev->dev,
"Failed to create link(s) to %s %s:"
" %d\n",
dev_driver_string(dev), dev_name(dev),
fn ?: pn);
Is it that important to know which failed to be created, or that both failed
to be created?
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-01 9:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4C28E14D.5050701@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <1277621246-10960-4-git-send-email-justinmattock@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <1277621246-10960-1-git-send-email-justinmattock@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <7214.1277729293@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <8066.1277750854@redhat.com>
2010-06-29 3:23 ` [PATCH 3/5]acpi:glue.c Fix warning: variable 'ret' set but not used Justin P. Mattock
2010-06-29 15:47 ` David Howells
2010-06-29 17:14 ` Justin P. Mattock
2010-06-29 21:53 ` Justin P. Mattock
2010-06-30 9:13 ` David Howells
2010-06-30 13:21 ` Justin P. Mattock
2010-06-30 19:47 ` Justin P. Mattock
2010-07-01 9:31 ` David Howells [this message]
2010-07-01 13:41 ` Justin P. Mattock
2010-07-01 20:01 ` Justin P. Mattock
2010-07-02 0:10 ` David Howells
2010-07-02 0:59 ` Justin P. Mattock
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=16513.1277976706@redhat.com \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=justinmattock@gmail.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).