From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 5/9] PM: Check power.needs_force_resume in pm_runtime_force_suspend()
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2025 21:19:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1855933.VLH7GnMWUR@rjwysocki.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5018768.GXAFRqVoOG@rjwysocki.net>
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Add a power.needs_force_resume check to pm_runtime_force_suspend() so
it need not rely on the runtime PM status of the device when deciding
whether or not to return early.
With the new check in place, pm_runtime_force_suspend() will also skip
devices with the runtime PM status equal to RPM_ACTIVE if they have
power.needs_force_resume set, so it won't need to change the RPM
status of the device to RPM_SUSPENDED in addition to setting
power.needs_force_resume in the case when pm_runtime_need_not_resume()
return false.
That allows the runtime PM status update to be removed from
pm_runtime_force_resume(), so the runtime PM status remains unchanged
between the pm_runtime_force_suspend() and pm_runtime_force_resume()
calls.
This change potentially unbreaks drivers that call pm_runtime_force_suspend()
from their ->remove() callbacks because currently, if the device being
unbound from its driver has a parent with enabled runtime PM and/or
(possibly) device links respecting runtime PM to suppliers, and it is
RPM_ACTIVE when the remove takes place, pm_runtime_force_suspend() will
not drop the parent's child count and the suppliers' runtime PM usage
counters after force-suspending the device unless pm_runtime_need_not_resume()
returns 'true' for it. Moreover, because pm_runtime_force_suspend()
changes the device's runtime PM status to RPM_SUSPENDED, in the above
case pm_runtime_reinit() will not cause those counters to drop, so they
will remain nonzero forever effectively preventing the devices in
question from runtime-suspending going forward.
This change is also needed for pm_runtime_force_suspend() to work
with PCI PM and ACPI PM after subsequent changes. Namely, say
DPM_FLAG_SMART_SUSPEND is set for a PCI device and its driver uses
pm_runtime_force_suspend() as its ->suspend() callback. If
pm_runtime_force_suspend() changed the runtime PM status of the
device to RPM_SUSPENDED, pci_pm_suspend_noirq() would skip the
device due to the dev_pm_skip_suspend() check.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
v2 -> v3:
* Update changelog (explanation why it potentially unbreaks some drivers and
why the subsequent changes depend on it).
* Reorder (it was [4/9] previously).
v1 -> v2: Corresponds to patch [2/9] (that was posted as [0/9] by mistake) in v1.
---
drivers/base/power/runtime.c | 21 ++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
@@ -1969,7 +1969,7 @@
int ret;
pm_runtime_disable(dev);
- if (pm_runtime_status_suspended(dev))
+ if (pm_runtime_status_suspended(dev) || dev->power.needs_force_resume)
return 0;
callback = RPM_GET_CALLBACK(dev, runtime_suspend);
@@ -1984,15 +1984,16 @@
/*
* If the device can stay in suspend after the system-wide transition
* to the working state that will follow, drop the children counter of
- * its parent, but set its status to RPM_SUSPENDED anyway in case this
- * function will be called again for it in the meantime.
+ * its parent and the usage counters of its suppliers. Otherwise, set
+ * power.needs_force_resume to let pm_runtime_force_resume() know that
+ * the device needs to be taken care of and to prevent this function
+ * from handling the device again in case the device is passed to it
+ * once more subsequently.
*/
- if (pm_runtime_need_not_resume(dev)) {
+ if (pm_runtime_need_not_resume(dev))
pm_runtime_set_suspended(dev);
- } else {
- __update_runtime_status(dev, RPM_SUSPENDED);
+ else
dev->power.needs_force_resume = true;
- }
return 0;
@@ -2033,12 +2034,6 @@
pm_runtime_status_suspended(dev)))
goto out;
- /*
- * The value of the parent's children counter is correct already, so
- * just update the status of the device.
- */
- __update_runtime_status(dev, RPM_ACTIVE);
-
callback = RPM_GET_CALLBACK(dev, runtime_resume);
dev_pm_disable_wake_irq_check(dev, false);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-27 19:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-27 19:05 [PATCH v3 0/9] PM: Reconcile different driver options for runtime PM integration with system sleep Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-06-27 19:06 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] PM: Use true/false as power.needs_force_resume values Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-06-27 19:08 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] PM: Move two sleep-related functions under CONFIG_PM_SLEEP Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-06-27 19:15 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] PM: Make pm_runtime_force_resume() work with DPM_FLAG_SMART_SUSPEND Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-06-27 19:16 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] PM: runtime: Clear power.needs_force_resume in pm_runtime_reinit() Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-06-27 19:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2025-06-27 19:20 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] PM: runtime: Introduce __rpm_get_driver_callback() Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-06-27 19:23 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] PM: sleep: Add strict_midlayer flag to struct dev_pm_info Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-06-27 19:25 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] ACPI: PM: Set/clear power.strict_midlayer in prepare/complete Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-06-27 19:29 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] PCI/PM: Set power.strict_midlayer in pci_pm_init() Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-07-02 14:11 ` [PATCH v3 0/9] PM: Reconcile different driver options for runtime PM integration with system sleep Ulf Hansson
2025-07-02 14:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1855933.VLH7GnMWUR@rjwysocki.net \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox