From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: Flag use of ACPI and ACPI idioms for power supplies to regulator API Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 22:55:25 +0100 Message-ID: <1872826.bbnxCFNbYC@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <1390782734-10131-1-git-send-email-broonie@kernel.org> <15814871.c5vzFttNXX@vostro.rjw.lan> <20140128122106.GA11949@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from v094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:63691 "HELO v094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1754923AbaA1VlI (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jan 2014 16:41:08 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20140128122106.GA11949@sirena.org.uk> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Brown Cc: Len Brown , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, Jean Delvare , Guenter Roeck On Tuesday, January 28, 2014 12:21:06 PM Mark Brown wrote: > > --XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Disposition: inline > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 01:06:45AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Monday, January 27, 2014 01:21:06 PM Mark Brown wrote: > > > > I'd like someone to take it :) . I'd expected the default thing would > > > be for it to go via the ACPI tree but I can apply it to the regulator > > > tree if you'd prefer, either way is fine by me. > > > I've queued it up for my next pull request, thanks! > > Excellent, thanks! Could you tag it for stable please as Jean > requested? In v3.13 it fixes regressions in lm90 on PCs if the > regulator API is enabled (which unfortunately Ubuntu did so it's > a real scenario) and it should be safe in older kernels though I'm > not aware of any actual systems that are affected. Done, thanks! -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.