From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Samuel Ortiz" <samuel@sortiz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [-mm] ACPI: export ACPI events via netlink
Date: 22 May 2007 10:05:00 -0000
Message-ID: <1HPWB1js.1179828300.1901360.samuel@sortiz.org>
References: <1179827251.7707.29.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <1179827251.7707.29.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: rui.zhang@intel.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "lenb@kernel.org" <lenb@kernel.org>, "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org


On 5/22/2007, "Zhang Rui" <rui.zhang@intel.com> wrote:
>Index: linux-2.6.22-rc1/include/linux/netlink.h
>===================================================================
>--- linux-2.6.22-rc1.orig/include/linux/netlink.h	2007-05-21 10:19:00.000000000 +0800
>+++ linux-2.6.22-rc1/include/linux/netlink.h	2007-05-21 15:26:14.000000000 +0800
>@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
> /* leave room for NETLINK_DM (DM Events) */
> #define NETLINK_SCSITRANSPORT	18	/* SCSI Transports */
> #define NETLINK_ECRYPTFS	19
>+#define NETLINK_ACPI_EVENT	20	/* acpi event notifications */
I think it is recommended to use the generic netlink layer instead of
having everyone adding its own netlink ID.

Cheers,
Samuel.