Linux ACPI
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
To: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
	Srivathsa L Rao <srivathsa.rao@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	Ganapatrao Kulkarni <ganapatrao.kulkarni@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	Trilok Soni <tsoni@quicinc.com>,
	Srinivas Ramana <sramana@qti.qualcomm.com>,
	Niyas Sait <niyas.sait@arm.com>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/15] arm_mpam: propagate MSC read errors for hw_probe functions
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2026 09:35:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1e5149fe-ef5f-48f1-9ee8-a7de2d6bc2af@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a628a34f-fd1a-4bd1-ba45-73d49922cc13@arm.com>

Hi Ben,

thanks for having a thorough look!

On 7/1/26 22:00, Ben Horgan wrote:
> Hi Andre,
> 
> On 7/2/26 17:22, Andre Przywara wrote:
>> Allow the functions probing for MSC hardware and features to return an
>> error, and propagate read errors from the lower level up.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>>   1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
>> index ce8738adb6ff..011d1e3544d7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
>> +++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
>> @@ -800,20 +800,22 @@ static bool mpam_ris_hw_probe_csu_nrdy(struct mpam_msc_ris *ris)
>>   	mpam_write_monsel_reg(msc, CFG_CSU_CTL, ctl_val);
>>   
>>   	_mpam_write_monsel_reg(msc, MSMON_CSU, MSMON___NRDY);
>> -	_mpam_read_monsel_reg(msc, MSMON_CSU, &now);
>> +	if (_mpam_read_monsel_reg(msc, MSMON_CSU, &now))
>> +		return false;
> 
> This early return leaves the mon_sel lock held.

Ouch, well spotted. I think this "if (WARN_ON_ONCE(...))" wrapper 
distracted me from the lock...
Changed it to use "goto out_unlock;"

> 
>>   	can_set = now & MSMON___NRDY;
> 
> As you're adding early returns to this function does it make sense to
> return early if can_set is false?

Well, this could have been done before as well, but it executes the 
remaining accesses nevertheless. I don't feel like judging whether this 
has a side effect, so just mimicked the current behaviour.
I feel like this should be a separate patch, if we need it.

Thanks,
Andre
  >>
>>   	_mpam_write_monsel_reg(msc, MSMON_CSU, 0);
>>   	/* Configuration change to try and coax hardware into setting nrdy */
>>   	mpam_write_monsel_reg(msc, CFG_CSU_FLT, 0x1);
>> -	_mpam_read_monsel_reg(msc, MSMON_CSU, &now);
>> +	if (_mpam_read_monsel_reg(msc, MSMON_CSU, &now))
>> +		return false;
>>   	can_clear = !(now & MSMON___NRDY);
>>   	mpam_mon_sel_unlock(msc);
>>   
>>   	return (!can_set || !can_clear);
>>   }
>>   
>> -static void mpam_ris_hw_probe(struct mpam_msc_ris *ris)
>> +static int mpam_ris_hw_probe(struct mpam_msc_ris *ris)
>>   {
>>   	int err;
>>   	struct mpam_msc *msc = ris->vmsc->msc;
>> @@ -828,7 +830,9 @@ static void mpam_ris_hw_probe(struct mpam_msc_ris *ris)
>>   	if (FIELD_GET(MPAMF_IDR_HAS_CCAP_PART, ris->idr)) {
>>   		u32 ccap_features;
>>   
>> -		mpam_read_partsel_reg(msc, CCAP_IDR, &ccap_features);
>> +		err = mpam_read_partsel_reg(msc, CCAP_IDR, &ccap_features);
>> +		if (err)
>> +			return err;
>>   
>>   		props->cmax_wd = FIELD_GET(MPAMF_CCAP_IDR_CMAX_WD, ccap_features);
>>   		if (props->cmax_wd &&
>> @@ -853,7 +857,9 @@ static void mpam_ris_hw_probe(struct mpam_msc_ris *ris)
>>   	if (FIELD_GET(MPAMF_IDR_HAS_CPOR_PART, ris->idr)) {
>>   		u32 cpor_features;
>>   
>> -		mpam_read_partsel_reg(msc, CPOR_IDR, &cpor_features);
>> +		err = mpam_read_partsel_reg(msc, CPOR_IDR, &cpor_features);
>> +		if (err)
>> +			return err;
>>   
>>   		props->cpbm_wd = FIELD_GET(MPAMF_CPOR_IDR_CPBM_WD, cpor_features);
>>   		if (props->cpbm_wd)
>> @@ -863,8 +869,9 @@ static void mpam_ris_hw_probe(struct mpam_msc_ris *ris)
>>   	/* Memory bandwidth partitioning */
>>   	if (FIELD_GET(MPAMF_IDR_HAS_MBW_PART, ris->idr)) {
>>   		u32 mbw_features;
>> -
>> -		mpam_read_partsel_reg(msc, MBW_IDR, &mbw_features);
>> +		err = mpam_read_partsel_reg(msc, MBW_IDR, &mbw_features);
>> +		if (err)
>> +			return err;
>>   
>>   		/* portion bitmap resolution */
>>   		props->mbw_pbm_bits = FIELD_GET(MPAMF_MBW_IDR_BWPBM_WD, mbw_features);
>> @@ -893,8 +900,9 @@ static void mpam_ris_hw_probe(struct mpam_msc_ris *ris)
>>   	/* Priority partitioning */
>>   	if (FIELD_GET(MPAMF_IDR_HAS_PRI_PART, ris->idr)) {
>>   		u32 pri_features;
>> -
>> -		mpam_read_partsel_reg(msc, PRI_IDR, &pri_features);
>> +		err = mpam_read_partsel_reg(msc, PRI_IDR, &pri_features);
>> +		if (err)
>> +			return err;
>>   
>>   		props->intpri_wd = FIELD_GET(MPAMF_PRI_IDR_INTPRI_WD, pri_features);
>>   		if (props->intpri_wd && FIELD_GET(MPAMF_PRI_IDR_HAS_INTPRI, pri_features)) {
>> @@ -915,7 +923,9 @@ static void mpam_ris_hw_probe(struct mpam_msc_ris *ris)
>>   	if (FIELD_GET(MPAMF_IDR_HAS_MSMON, ris->idr)) {
>>   		u32 msmon_features;
>>   
>> -		mpam_read_partsel_reg(msc, MSMON_IDR, &msmon_features);
>> +		err = mpam_read_partsel_reg(msc, MSMON_IDR, &msmon_features);
>> +		if (err)
>> +			return err;
>>   
>>   		/*
>>   		 * If the firmware max-nrdy-us property is missing, the
>> @@ -928,7 +938,9 @@ static void mpam_ris_hw_probe(struct mpam_msc_ris *ris)
>>   		if (FIELD_GET(MPAMF_MSMON_IDR_MSMON_CSU, msmon_features)) {
>>   			u32 csumonidr;
>>   
>> -			mpam_read_partsel_reg(msc, CSUMON_IDR, &csumonidr);
>> +			err = mpam_read_partsel_reg(msc, CSUMON_IDR, &csumonidr);
>> +			if (err)
>> +				return err;
>>   
>>   			props->num_csu_mon = FIELD_GET(MPAMF_CSUMON_IDR_NUM_MON, csumonidr);
>>   			if (props->num_csu_mon) {
>> @@ -954,7 +966,9 @@ static void mpam_ris_hw_probe(struct mpam_msc_ris *ris)
>>   			bool has_long;
>>   			u32 mbwumon_idr;
>>   
>> -			mpam_read_partsel_reg(msc, MBWUMON_IDR, &mbwumon_idr);
>> +			err = mpam_read_partsel_reg(msc, MBWUMON_IDR, &mbwumon_idr);
>> +			if (err)
>> +				return err;
>>   
>>   			props->num_mbwu_mon = FIELD_GET(MPAMF_MBWUMON_IDR_NUM_MON, mbwumon_idr);
>>   			if (props->num_mbwu_mon) {
>> @@ -987,16 +1001,22 @@ static void mpam_ris_hw_probe(struct mpam_msc_ris *ris)
>>   		u16 partid_max;
>>   		u32 nrwidr;
>>   
>> -		mpam_read_partsel_reg(msc, PARTID_NRW_IDR, &nrwidr);
>> +		err = mpam_read_partsel_reg(msc, PARTID_NRW_IDR, &nrwidr);
>> +		if (err)
>> +			return err;
>> +
>>   		partid_max = FIELD_GET(MPAMF_PARTID_NRW_IDR_INTPARTID_MAX, nrwidr);
>>   
>>   		mpam_set_feature(mpam_feat_partid_nrw, props);
>>   		msc->partid_max = min(msc->partid_max, partid_max);
>>   	}
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>>   }
>>   
>>   static int mpam_msc_hw_probe(struct mpam_msc *msc)
>>   {
>> +	int ret;
>>   	u64 idr;
>>   	u16 partid_max;
>>   	u8 ris_idx, pmg_max;
>> @@ -1012,10 +1032,12 @@ static int mpam_msc_hw_probe(struct mpam_msc *msc)
>>   
>>   	/* Grab an IDR value to find out how many RIS there are */
>>   	mutex_lock(&msc->part_sel_lock);
>> -	mpam_msc_read_idr(msc, &idr);
>> -	mpam_read_partsel_reg(msc, IIDR, &msc->iidr);
>> -
>> +	ret = mpam_msc_read_idr(msc, &idr);
>> +	if (!ret)
>> +		ret = mpam_read_partsel_reg(msc, IIDR, &msc->iidr);
>>   	mutex_unlock(&msc->part_sel_lock);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		return ret;
>>   
>>   	mpam_enable_quirks(msc);
>>   
>> @@ -1028,8 +1050,10 @@ static int mpam_msc_hw_probe(struct mpam_msc *msc)
>>   	for (ris_idx = 0; ris_idx <= msc->ris_max; ris_idx++) {
>>   		mutex_lock(&msc->part_sel_lock);
>>   		__mpam_part_sel(ris_idx, 0, msc);
>> -		mpam_msc_read_idr(msc, &idr);
>> +		ret = mpam_msc_read_idr(msc, &idr);
>>   		mutex_unlock(&msc->part_sel_lock);
>> +		if (ret)
>> +			return ret;
>>   
>>   		partid_max = FIELD_GET(MPAMF_IDR_PARTID_MAX, idr);
>>   		pmg_max = FIELD_GET(MPAMF_IDR_PMG_MAX, idr);
>> @@ -1046,8 +1070,10 @@ static int mpam_msc_hw_probe(struct mpam_msc *msc)
>>   
>>   		mutex_lock(&msc->part_sel_lock);
>>   		__mpam_part_sel(ris_idx, 0, msc);
>> -		mpam_ris_hw_probe(ris);
>> +		ret = mpam_ris_hw_probe(ris);
>>   		mutex_unlock(&msc->part_sel_lock);
>> +		if (ret)
>> +			return ret;
>>   	}
>>   
>>   	/* Clear any stale errors */
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-09  7:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-02 16:22 [PATCH v2 00/15] arm_mpam: Add MPAM-Fb firmware support Andre Przywara
2026-07-02 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 01/15] arm_mpam: let low level MSC read accessors return an error Andre Przywara
2026-07-02 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 02/15] arm_mpam: propagate MSC read errors for wrapper functions Andre Przywara
2026-07-01 19:56   ` Ben Horgan
2026-07-09  7:34     ` Andre Przywara
2026-07-02 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 03/15] arm_mpam: propagate MSC read errors for hw_probe functions Andre Przywara
2026-07-01 20:00   ` Ben Horgan
2026-07-09  7:35     ` Andre Przywara [this message]
2026-07-02 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 04/15] arm_mpam: propagate MSC read errors for mpam_msc_read_mbwu_l() Andre Przywara
2026-07-01 20:06   ` Ben Horgan
2026-07-09  7:36     ` Andre Przywara
2026-07-09  8:42       ` Ben Horgan
2026-07-02 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 05/15] arm_mpam: propagate MSC read errors for msmon helpers Andre Przywara
2026-07-02 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 06/15] arm_mpam: propagate MSC read errors for __ris_msmon_read() Andre Przywara
2026-07-01 20:14   ` Ben Horgan
2026-07-09  7:43     ` Andre Przywara
2026-07-02 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 07/15] arm_mpam: propagate MSC read errors for state saving functions Andre Przywara
2026-07-01 20:19   ` Ben Horgan
2026-07-09 10:03     ` Andre Przywara
2026-07-02 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 08/15] arm_mpam: let low level MSC write accessors return an error Andre Przywara
2026-07-02 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 09/15] arm_mpam: propagate MSC write errors for ESR and part_sel wrappers Andre Przywara
2026-07-02 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 10/15] arm_mpam: propagate MSC write errors for hardware probe functions Andre Przywara
2026-07-02 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 11/15] arm_mpam: propagate MSC write errors for remaining MSC write users Andre Przywara
2026-07-02 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 12/15] arm_mpam: Split the locking around the mon_sel registers Andre Przywara
2026-07-01 21:01   ` Ben Horgan
2026-07-02 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 13/15] arm_mpam: add MPAM-Fb MSC firmware access support Andre Przywara
2026-07-08 11:21   ` Ben Horgan
2026-07-02 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 14/15] arm_mpam: prevent MPAM-Fb accesses inside IRQ handler Andre Przywara
2026-07-03 10:54   ` Ben Horgan
2026-07-09 12:06     ` Andre Przywara
2026-07-09 13:27       ` Ben Horgan
2026-07-02 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 15/15] arm_mpam: detect and enable MPAM-Fb PCC support Andre Przywara
2026-07-03 11:00   ` Ben Horgan
2026-07-09  9:42     ` Ben Horgan
2026-07-09 13:53     ` Andre Przywara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1e5149fe-ef5f-48f1-9ee8-a7de2d6bc2af@arm.com \
    --to=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=ben.horgan@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
    --cc=ganapatrao.kulkarni@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=niyas.sait@arm.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=sramana@qti.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=srivathsa.rao@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@kernel.org \
    --cc=tsoni@quicinc.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox