Re: [PATCH 1/1] ACPI/nfit: correct the badrange to be reported in nfit_handle_mce()

["Verma, Vishal L" <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>]

On Wed, 2020-11-18 at 16:41 +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
> The badrange to be reported should always cover mce->addr.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/nfit/mce.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Ah good find, agreed with Dan that this is stable material.
Minor nit, I'd recommend rewording the subject line to something like:

"acpi/nfit: fix badrange insertion in nfit_handle_mce()"

Otherwise, looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>

> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/nfit/mce.c b/drivers/acpi/nfit/mce.c
> index ee8d9973f60b..053e719c7bea 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/nfit/mce.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit/mce.c
> @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static int nfit_handle_mce(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val,
>  
>  		/* If this fails due to an -ENOMEM, there is little we can do */
>  		nvdimm_bus_add_badrange(acpi_desc->nvdimm_bus,
> -				ALIGN(mce->addr, L1_CACHE_BYTES),
> +				ALIGN_DOWN(mce->addr, L1_CACHE_BYTES),
>  				L1_CACHE_BYTES);
>  		nvdimm_region_notify(nfit_spa->nd_region,
>  				NVDIMM_REVALIDATE_POISON);