From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: Fixing ACPI compilation, fixing CONFIG_ACPI_BOOT Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 11:58:40 +0200 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20020807095839.GA289@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20020804185103.GA14972@elf.ucw.cz> <1028597611.1620.42.camel@darkstar.portugal> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1028597611.1620.42.camel-4/PLUo9XfK/yXfm4dIG/yWZHpeb/A1Y/@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E9rgio?= Monteiro Basto Cc: Pavel Machek , ACPI mailing list List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Hi! > I applied this patch in kernel 2.4.19 > but what are you try to fix ? > boot parameters ? > if so what boot parameters can be used ? Its 2.5.X patch, and it tries to fix CONFIG_ACPI_BOOT. Its not meant for 2.4.19. Pavel -- Worst form of spam? Adding advertisment signatures ala sourceforge.net. What goes next? Inserting advertisment *into* email? ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf