From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Erich Focht Subject: Re: [Discontig-devel] Cleanup of NUMA support in ACPI Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 14:41:41 +0200 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <200208071441.41229.efocht@ess.nec.de> References: <20020807033450.DALTC0A82650.6C9EC293@mvf.biglobe.ne.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20020807033450.DALTC0A82650.6C9EC293-dPjYVeZdYcz+G+EEi5ephHgSJqDPrsil@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: "KOCHI, Takayoshi" , discontig-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Cc: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Hi Tak, looks good! I'll try to fill in the arch-dependent pieces. Only one small detail: > --- david-020722/drivers/acpi/Config.in Tue Jul 23 16:01:28 2002 > +++ david-020722-srat/drivers/acpi/Config.in Mon Aug 5 22:19:55 200= 2 > @@ -99,6 +99,7 @@ > define_bool CONFIG_ACPI_FAN n > define_bool CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR n > define_bool CONFIG_ACPI_THERMAL n > + define_bool CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA n > endmenu > fi > =20 =46rom earlier email exchange with Jack Steiner I understood that SGI uses at least SRAT tables. Maybe somebody from SGI can comment? So this would have to be changed. Regards, Erich ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf