* acpi-patch + kernel 2.4.19
@ 2002-08-07 21:55 Sebastian Henschel
[not found] ` <20020807215528.GA646-adzhR0EPeY/7X6WiDY61Ug@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sebastian Henschel @ 2002-08-07 21:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f
hi folx...
did anyone of you try to install the current acpi-patch to the current
linux kernel 2.4.19?
i am very confused, since the structure of the files in linux/drivers/acpi
seems to have changed enormously. on the other hand, acpi from the original
kernel still seems to be quite old (output from dmesg):
ACPI: Core Subsystem version [20011018]
ACPI: Subsystem enabled
well, and as you can see, acpi claims to be enabled. but there is no
/proc/acpi to be found. even with the stock 2.4.18 a couple of months ago,
i had at least something in there.
any insights?
cheers,
sebastian
p.s.: please cc: me or group-reply, i am not on the list, so far.
--
::: sebastian henschel
::: code scrambler
::: - OpenPGP compliant key available
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: acpi-patch + kernel 2.4.19
[not found] ` <20020807215528.GA646-adzhR0EPeY/7X6WiDY61Ug@public.gmane.org>
@ 2002-08-07 23:27 ` Andy Dustman
2002-08-08 9:46 ` Jörg Sonnenberger
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andy Dustman @ 2002-08-07 23:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sebastian Henschel; +Cc: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f
On Wed, 2002-08-07 at 17:55, Sebastian Henschel wrote:
> did anyone of you try to install the current acpi-patch to the current
> linux kernel 2.4.19?
Just for fun, I tried to merge the current patch into 2.4.19 last night.
It wasn't fun.
Actually, I wrote a script that does a three-way merge, in the same
manner as diff3 -m, but working recursively. There are a number of
conflicts, which you would likely get just applying the patch directly
as well. Some of the conflicts are non-trivial, or at least, they were
non-trivial for me to fix them, but I may give it another look.
--
Andy Dustman PGP: 0x930B8AB6
@ .net http://dustman.net/andy
"Cogito, ergo sum." -- Rene Descartes
"I yam what I yam and that's all what I yam." -- Popeye
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: acpi-patch + kernel 2.4.19
[not found] ` <20020807215528.GA646-adzhR0EPeY/7X6WiDY61Ug@public.gmane.org>
2002-08-07 23:27 ` Andy Dustman
@ 2002-08-08 9:46 ` Jörg Sonnenberger
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jörg Sonnenberger @ 2002-08-08 9:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ACPI devel Mailinglist; +Cc: Sebastian Henschel
Am Mittwoch, 7. August 2002 23:55 schrieb Sebastian Henschel:
> hi folx...
>
> did anyone of you try to install the current acpi-patch to the current
> linux kernel 2.4.19?
>
Well, I tried against 2.4.19-ac1. The patch itself creates lots of rejects,
some of them I couldn't solve directly.
> i am very confused, since the structure of the files in linux/drivers/acpi
> seems to have changed enormously. on the other hand, acpi from the original
> kernel still seems to be quite old (output from dmesg):
>
> ACPI: Core Subsystem version [20011018]
> ACPI: Subsystem enabled
Yep, this version doesn't support my battery state, 2.5.25 does.
>
> well, and as you can see, acpi claims to be enabled. but there is no
> /proc/acpi to be found. even with the stock 2.4.18 a couple of months ago,
> i had at least something in there.
>
That's strange. It's working for me with both the plain 2.4.18 and 2.4.19-ac1.
Any error message in dmesg? Perhaps the bios is some kind of broken or acpi
is inactivated per command line?
> any insights?
>
> cheers,
> sebastian
>
> p.s.: please cc: me or group-reply, i am not on the list, so far.
Jörg
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* RE: acpi-patch + kernel 2.4.19
@ 2002-08-13 19:34 Grover, Andrew
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Grover, Andrew @ 2002-08-13 19:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Andy Dustman', Sebastian Henschel
Cc: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f
> From: Andy Dustman [mailto:andy-gRfBfDTKyCbR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org]
> Just for fun, I tried to merge the current patch into 2.4.19
> last night.
> It wasn't fun.
>
> Actually, I wrote a script that does a three-way merge, in the same
> manner as diff3 -m, but working recursively. There are a number of
> conflicts, which you would likely get just applying the patch directly
> as well. Some of the conflicts are non-trivial, or at least, they were
> non-trivial for me to fix them, but I may give it another look.
For those of you using BK, the linux-2.4-acpi tree at linux-acpi.bkbits.net
is merged up to 2.4.20-pre2 and contains the latest ACPI patch.
(yes, the merge wasn't fun...)
Regards -- Andy
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Dice - The leading online job board
for high-tech professionals. Search and apply for tech jobs today!
http://seeker.dice.com/seeker.epl?rel_code=31
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-08-13 19:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-08-07 21:55 acpi-patch + kernel 2.4.19 Sebastian Henschel
[not found] ` <20020807215528.GA646-adzhR0EPeY/7X6WiDY61Ug@public.gmane.org>
2002-08-07 23:27 ` Andy Dustman
2002-08-08 9:46 ` Jörg Sonnenberger
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-08-13 19:34 Grover, Andrew
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox