From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: Runlevel for Sleep? Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 12:21:54 +0000 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20020906122153.F39@toy.ucw.cz> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: In-Reply-To: ; from andrew.grover-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org on Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 04:47:44PM -0700 Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: "Grover, Andrew" Cc: "'P. Christeas'" , acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Hi! > Right now I am leaning towards no. We don't have a runlevel for APM's > suspend, why would we for ACPI sleep? I believe we should have it for APM, too. umounting nfs seems like good idea, and no ammount of drivers will fix that. > I think we'll know better once we have working device power management if a > new runlevel is needed or not. I believe 3 of them are needed - S1, S3 and S4. Pavel -- Philips Velo 1: 1"x4"x8", 300gram, 60, 12MB, 40bogomips, linux, mutt, details at http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/velo/index.html. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390