From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: RE: CALL FOR TESTING Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 13:51:01 +0100 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20020920135101.K10583@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> References: <3D8B1470.5020507@optonline.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3D8B1470.5020507-p32f3XyCuykqcZcGjlUOXw@public.gmane.org>; from berndp-p32f3XyCuykqcZcGjlUOXw@public.gmane.org on Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 08:28:32AM -0400 Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: Bernd Pfrommer Cc: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 08:28:32AM -0400, Bernd Pfrommer wrote: > kernel: 2.4.20-pre7, with patch acpi20020918, configured with ACPI > platform: intel server SRMK2S with AMIBIOS and dual 1GHz PIII/256k > cache, 1GB memory, adaptec 7899 SCSI > > DOES NOT BOOT The question Andy forgot to ask is: Does it work with ACPI enabled in the stock 2.4.20-pre7 kernel? [ If NO, there is no problem with including today's code. Didn't work before, still doesn't work => not a regression. ] I agree your machine should be fixed, but the real purpose of this test is to determine whether there are any impediments to including this code in 2.4.20. -- Revolutions do not require corporate support. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf