From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Subject: Re: CALL FOR TESTING Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 16:32:35 +0200 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <200209201432.g8KEWZX16274@mailgate5.cinetic.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: acpi-devel-pyega4qmqnRoyOMFzWx49A@public.gmane.org, "Grover, Andrew" List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org "Grover, Andrew" schrieb am 19.09.02 08:30:22: > I wanted to make a special request for testing of the 2.4 patch (or should I > say, MEGA-patch). > > Marcelo has asked for widespread testing of it, in anticipation of likely > 2.4 mainline inclusion. I will be posting a call for testing to linux-kernel > soon, but am posting this here first to hopefully weed out any really bad > bugs that may have crept in. > > The main issues of importance are: > > - DOES IT BOOT? yes > - DOES IT ASSIGN INTERRUPTS PROPERLY? yes > > Failure to do so either indicates a bug that we need to fix (fast) or a > system that should go on the blacklist. dmesg now includes the DSDT > signature to aid blacklisting. I'd really like to see it in the 2.4 kernel line. Thanks Joerg ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf