From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [PATCH] warning: implicit declaration of function mp_config_ioapic_for_sci Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 12:59:12 +0100 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20021008125912.Q18545@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> References: <1034060159.1541.24.camel@darkstar.portugal> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1034060159.1541.24.camel-4/PLUo9XfK/yXfm4dIG/yWZHpeb/A1Y/@public.gmane.org>; from sergiomb-5ng0By4jB+/QUPosyRRdSA@public.gmane.org on Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 02:55:57AM -0400 Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E9rgio_Monteiro_Basto?= Cc: acpi-devel List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 02:55:57AM -0400, Sérgio Monteiro Basto wrote: > +++ linux-2.4.19acpi/include/asm-i386/mpspec.h Sun Oct 6 21:34:06 2002 ^^^^^^^^ > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86 > +extern void mp_config_ioapic_for_sci(int irq); > +#endif /*CONFIG_X86*/ you really don't need to encase this in CONFIG_X86. if it's in asm-i386 and some other cpu type is including this file, things are already hideously wrong. -- Revolutions do not require corporate support. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf