From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: testing ACPI under 2.5 with / on LVM Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 16:54:13 +0200 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20021011145413.GA708@elf.ucw.cz> References: <21870.1033647384@www63.gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <21870.1033647384-0mmRn995n8Bmcu3hnIyYJQ@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: Markus Weiss Cc: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Hi! > I would like to test ACPI under a recent 2.5 kernels on my laptop > (especially > because of S4 support). Unfortunately I have the root filesystem on LVM, a > fact > which makes testing under 2.5 a little complicated. Someone on linux-kernel > suggested to use a recent version of evms for 2.5, but I am afraid that evms > will > not play nicely together with S4/swsusp. > Does anyone have suggestions / comments ? There's no reason evms should collide with swsusp. Of course probably noone tested that. ... Just dont have your swap partition handled by LVM. Pavel -- I'm pavel-7aPAsKgELzg@public.gmane.org "In my country we have almost anarchy and I don't care." Panos Katsaloulis describing me w.r.t. patents at discuss-q33YXrgyAoMgsBAKwltoeQ@public.gmane.org ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf