From: Aaron Gaudio <prothonotar-2LEdZMXKCZJeeLb3ft/vUmD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: ACPI-Patch against 2.4.20-pre10-ac1
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 18:57:02 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021011225702.GA17690@tarnation.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1034372783.12355.4.camel-MMxVpc8zpTQVh3rx8e9g/fyykp6/JSeS3vcXtXqGYxw@public.gmane.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1566 bytes --]
I use acpi and cpufreq on my Vaio r505 laptop. ACPI does not
seem to be able to do cpu throttling on the system (it's a Pentium
III-M if anyone's interested), but the modules for cpufreq handles
it well (except when it first loads during boot it seems to be
getting odd numbers in the proc files).
These statements are based on an earlier pre-patch than pre10 though.
Behold, Alan Cox <alan-qBU/x9rampVanCEyBjwyrvXRex20P6io@public.gmane.org> hath decreed:
> On Fri, 2002-10-11 at 17:34, Hanno Böck wrote:
> > I tried to apply the acpi-patch against 2.4.20-pre10-ac1.
> >
> > It is not perfect, there are some problems with cpufreq i couldn't fix. If you disable cpufreq, it should compile and run.
> >
> > If anyone fixes the cpufreq-issue, please inform me.
>
> You don't want to mix the two. If you do need native power management on
> your ACPI system the ACPI layer eventually has to be the one making the
> cpufreq requests
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Acpi-devel mailing list
> Acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-devel
--
Aaron Gaudio
prothontar at tarnation.dyndns.org
http://prothonotarium.dyndns.org
"From fullness, aspect. From aspect, being. From being, emptiness."
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-11 22:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-11 16:34 ACPI-Patch against 2.4.20-pre10-ac1 Hanno Böck
[not found] ` <20021011183427.20a55d1c.hanno-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
2002-10-11 21:46 ` Alan Cox
[not found] ` <1034372783.12355.4.camel-MMxVpc8zpTQVh3rx8e9g/fyykp6/JSeS3vcXtXqGYxw@public.gmane.org>
2002-10-11 22:57 ` Aaron Gaudio [this message]
[not found] ` <20021011225702.GA17690-2LEdZMXKCZJeeLb3ft/vUmD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
2002-10-11 23:50 ` Alan Cox
[not found] ` <m2ofa0ywg7.fsf@tnuctip.rychter.com>
[not found] ` <m2ofa0ywg7.fsf-dTJq59+VGzkkCw8IV3R6h0EOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
2002-10-12 13:31 ` Andrew Kohlsmith
2002-10-14 9:24 ` Ducrot Bruno
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021011225702.GA17690@tarnation.dyndns.org \
--to=prothonotar-2ledzmxkczjeelb3ft/vumd2fqjk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
--cc=acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox