From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Kohlsmith Subject: Re: Re: ACPI-Patch against 2.4.20-pre10-ac1 Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 09:31:07 -0400 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <200210120931.07811@-mixdown.ca> References: <20021011183427.20a55d1c.hanno@gmx.de> <1034380226.12709.1.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org > Yes, but in a real world this seems to be a common case. On my Sharp > Mebius PC-MT1-H5 ACPI does not handle CPU power management. I use the > 'speedstep' utility to adjust clock speed. My Compaq Evo N160N has no throttling support through ACPI, but I can cut the speed to 700MHz (from 1GHz) through /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/performance. Regards, Andrew ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf