From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Kohlsmith Subject: Re: ACPI & APIC Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 09:13:43 -0400 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <200210160913.43931@-mixdown.ca> References: <20021014105058.7898C2063B@mail.uboot.com> <1034711544.1511.2.camel@speedy-gonzales> <3DAD2270.A97616D7@monetplus.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <3DAD2270.A97616D7-Bh/+Xfn7orxQjibfaplwYw@public.gmane.org> Content-Disposition: inline Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org > I have Compaq Armada 110, kernel 2.4.19 with ACPI patch and notice the > same. But when I played with kernel configuration (& serial console :-) I > figured, that when I have enabled both ACPI (without pci=noacpi) & APIC > together, my computer hangs on boot right in Interrupt routing :-{ Has > anybody any clue ? You're saying that if you compile the kernel WITHOUT APIC support that you don't need pci=noacpi? This is a valuable clue I think! I think I'm going to try that in the next day or so and see if it's the same here. Maybe the Compaq laptops have bad entries for the APIC initialization in the ACPI tables or something. Regards, Andrew ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: viaVerio will pay you up to $1,000 for every account that you consolidate with us. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4749864;7604308;v? http://www.viaverio.com/consolidator/osdn.cfm