Re: ACPI Source patches updated (20021022)

[Ducrot Bruno <ducrot-kk6yZipjEM5g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>]

On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 09:40:46PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 08:25:27PM +0200, Ducrot Bruno wrote:
> >
> > So I think this is an AML issue.  Your AGP device is actually a
> > bridge and ACPI spec require a _PRT entry for each bridge.
> 
> The DSDT has PCI0._PRT in which 00:01.0 (the AGP bridge) is listed. Are
> you saying that there should also be PCI1._PRT with just one entry for
> 01:00.0? If that were the case there wouldn't be any need to derive the
> IRQ would there?
> 

You should have something like this:

Device(PCI0) {
	Name(..)
	Name (_ADR, 0x00)
	...
	Name (_PRT, Package(...) ) {
		...
	}
	...
	Device (AGP) {
		Name (_ADR, 0x00010000)
		Name (_PRT, Package(1) {
			Package(4) {
				...,
				0x00,
				PATH.TO.LNKA,
				...
			}
		})
		Device (VGA) {
			...
		}
	}
	...

}

If you have Name(_ADR, 0x00010000) for your Device (AGP), it
should ok to add the _PRT entry.  This is also a requirement, but
only for 2.0 specs.

-- 
Ducrot Bruno
http://www.poupinou.org        Page profaissionelle
http://toto.tu-me-saoules.com  Haume page


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future 
of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community 
Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. 
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0002en