From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ducrot Bruno Subject: Re: 2002-10-22 processor&thermal module broken? Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 21:51:54 +0200 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20021024195154.GC8003@poup.poupinou.org> References: <1035486370.2453.9.camel@coruscant.datenknoten.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: Markus Gaugusch Cc: ACPI-Devel List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 09:06:45PM +0200, Markus Gaugusch wrote: > On Oct 24, Sebastian Zimmermann wrote: > > > Hi, > > > I just tried 2.4.20-pre11 with latest acpi patch (+ swsusp) and there is > > > no processor/thermal entry in my /proc anymore. Any hints? > > Here they are also missing. 2.4.20-pre11-acpi20021022 > > Thermal zone is enabled in config file. > Are you per chance using gcc 3.2, like me? > May this be the problem?? > I just give it a try. Do not have anymore processor too (grumble, grumble :) ducrot@novae:~$ ls -1 /proc/acpi/ ac_adapter alarm battery button debug_layer debug_level dsdt embedded_controller event fadt info sleep thermal_zone ducrot@novae:~$ gcc -v Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/2.95.4/specs gcc version 2.95.4 (Debian prerelease) -- Ducrot Bruno http://www.poupinou.org Page profaissionelle http://toto.tu-me-saoules.com Haume page ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0003en