From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: making progress with ACPI was: ACPI small patch update (20021024) Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 21:34:04 +0000 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20021028213404.U27461@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> References: <200210282031.g9SKVAX06731@mailgate5.cinetic.de> <20021028211603.GD1402@admingilde.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021028211603.GD1402-4e/A4rHm86X2JYTphGNI2Q@public.gmane.org>; from tali-4e/A4rHm86X2JYTphGNI2Q@public.gmane.org on Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 10:16:04PM +0100 Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: acpi-devel-pyega4qmqnRoyOMFzWx49A@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 10:16:04PM +0100, Martin Waitz wrote: > On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 09:31:10PM +0100, joerg.beyer-htSm2yLGOjU@public.gmane.org wrote: > > well sourceforge gives you a bug tracker, if you want it. > > ibm talked about sponsoring a bugzilla for kernel development. > perhaps one could use that for acpi, too. i find it fascinating that there are so many people on this list who want to see a bug tracking system, but don't feel able to keep a list of bugs themselves. why is that? expecting andy to set it up seems unreasonable. -- Revolutions do not require corporate support. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf