From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Subject: Re: RE: Re: making progress with ACPI was: ACPI small patch up date Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 08:12:25 +0100 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <200210300712.g9U7CPX05667@mailgate5.cinetic.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Huw Hawkins schrieb am 30.10.02 02:22:01: > > I've given this some though. What you're trying to say, basically, is > the sf bugtracker isn't suitable because you need at least a DSDT/dmesg > with the bug report and preferably access to ask further questions, so > unless someone has that implimented in a bug-track system (with hosting > to match) it's a nightmarish task. sourceforges bug tracker allows to attach files to a report. The submitter is know with it's email address. yours Joerg ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf