From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Summerfield Subject: Re: Re: making progress with ACPI was: ACPI small patch update Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 09:43:15 +0800 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <200210310940.17218.acpi@computerdatasafe.com.au> References: <200210300925.g9U9PbD05581@ikffws2.ikff.uni-stuttgart.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200210300925.g9U9PbD05581-sBhUd1W9t4xfrO0PeCDDO4ECbGbo6+O1OOFObY0sJ7w@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Rats. Did it again. On Wed, 30 Oct 2002 17:25, Jens Haug wrote: > Or maybe people will read about all these bugs and think ACPI on > Intel was a mess - although these bugs are perfectly normal in this > stage of development. > I dunno. > Maybe I'm all wrong here. I hope I am. Does the lk team hide its bugs? To my mind the best-supported software I use is fetchmail, and the standard way there of reporting bugs is to the list. It's very public. Red Hat's buglist is open to all, for all the software it packages. I expect ACPI falls between the two in the number of bugs it has. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0004en